Skip to main content
Log in

Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a single tunnel reconstruction of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint instabilities with implants of the second generation is sufficient for stabilisation, especially in combination with an AC cerclage.

Methods

Patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation type Rockwood III-B and V were included. Besides clinical follow-up examination, radiographs were analysed. The functional outcome measures were Constant Score (CS), Taft score (TS), ACJI score and patient’s satisfaction. Horizontal instability was evaluated by clinical examination and radiological with an Alexander view.

Results

Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 29 months were included. Ninety-seven per cent were satisfied with their result, with an average Subjective Shoulder Value of 90%. The CS averaged at 90 ± 10 points, TS at 11 ± 1 points and ACJI at 78 ± 18 points. Radiologically, 3 of 29 patients (10%) showed a persisting horizontal instability. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance improved from 22 preoperative to 10 mm postoperative, which was comparable to the contralateral side (10 mm, p = 0.103). At follow-up the CC distance increased to 13 mm (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

AC-joint stabilisation with a single tunnel reconstruction using a second-generation implant results in good to excellent clinical results with high patient satisfaction. The additional AC augmentation improves stability in horizontal instable AC-joints and is recommended in all high-grade AC joint stabilisations. Nonetheless, reduction was slightly lost over time due to an elongation or suture failure of the coraco-clavicular fixation.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [G.J.] upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J (2007) Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med 35:316–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506298022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J et al (2013) Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 29:387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balke M, Schneider MM, Shafizadeh S et al (2015) Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1447–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2795-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Venjakob AJ, Salzmann GM, Gabel F et al (2013) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings. Am J Sports Med 41:615–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512473438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheibel M, Dröschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N (2011) Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 39:1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511399379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen G, Katthagen JC, Alvarado LE et al (2014) Has the arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute AC joint separations with the double tight-rope technique advantages over the clavicular hook plate fixation? Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 22:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2270-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patzer T, Clauss C, Kühne C, a, et al (2013) Arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: comparison of clinical and radiological results of single versus double TightRope™ technique. Unfallchirurg 116:442–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schliemann B, Roßlenbroich SB, Schneider KN et al (2015) Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2737-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saier T, Venjakob AJ, Minzlaff P et al (2015) Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2895-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klimkiewicz JJ, Williams GR, Sher JS et al (1999) The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:119–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen G, Katthagen JC, Alvarado L et al (2013) Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of chronic AC-joint instabilities in GraftRope™ technique with an additive horizontal tendon augmentation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:841–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1745-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander O (1949) Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Radiography 15:260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rockwood CJ (1984) Injuries in the acromioclavicular joint – subluxations and dislocations about the shoulder. In: Rockwood CJ, Green D (eds) Fractures in adults. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 890–910

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Bak K et al (2014) ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Arthroscopy 30:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs B, Jost B, Gerber C (2000) Posterior-inferior capsular shift for the treatment of recurrent, voluntary posterior subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:16–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW (1987) Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study of the Acromioclavicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1045–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Irlenbusch U (2012) Examination techniques of the shoulder - expert’s evaluation based on literature analysis. Obere Extrem 7:61

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen G, Katthagen C, Voigt C, Lill H (2014) Arthroscopically assisted treatment of lateral clavicular fractures and acute instability of the acromioclavicular joint. Arthroskopie 27:255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-014-0842-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pogorzelski J, Fritz EM, Godin JA et al (2018) Nonoperative treatment of five common shoulder injuries: a critical analysis. Obere Extrem 13:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0449-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kraus N, Hann C, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2018) Dynamic instability of the acromioclavicular joint: a new classification for acute AC joint separation. Obere Extrem 13:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0469-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Helfen T, Siebenbürger G, Ockert B, Haasters F (2015) Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures. Unfallchirurg 118:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-015-0005-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gowd AK, Liu JN, Cabarcas BC et al (2019) Current concepts in the operative management of acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative techniques. Am J Sports Med 47:2745–3758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518795147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Metzlaff S, Rosslenbroich S, Forkel PH et al (2016) Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1972–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3294-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andreani L, Bonicoli E, Parchi P et al (2014) Acromio-clavicular repair using two different techniques. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1186-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stein T, Müller D, Blank M et al (2018) Stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separation: a prospective assessment of the clavicular hook plate versus the double double-button suture procedure. Am J Sports Med 46:2725–2734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518788355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pauly S, Kraus N, Greiner S, Scheibel M (2013) Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen G, Millett PJ, Tahal DS et al (2017) Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies associated with acute and chronic grade III and grade V acromioclavicular joint injuries. Int Orthop 41:1633–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3469-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arrigoni P, Brady PC, Zottarelli L et al (2014) Associated lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 30:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dyrna F, Imhoff FB, Haller B et al (2018) Primary stability of an acromioclavicular joint repair is affected by the type of additional reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule. Am J Sports Med 46:3471–3479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518807908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Theopold J, Schöbel T, Fischer J-P et al (2019) Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05674-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salzmann GM, Walz L, Buchmann S et al (2010) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 38:1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509355645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hann C, Kraus N, Minkus M et al (2018) Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4643-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martetschläger F, Horan MP, Warth RJ, Millett PJ (2013) Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 41:2896–2903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513502459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM et al (2012) Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sport Meds 40:1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512445273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Banffy MB, van Eck CF, ElAttrache NS (2018) Clinical outcomes of a single-tunnel technique for coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:S70–S75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Flinkkilä TE, Ihanainen E (2014) Results of arthroscopy-assisted tightrope repair of acromioclavicular dislocations. Shoulder Elbow 6:18–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/sae.12040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fahmy FS, Fathi H, ElAttar M (2019) Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic assissted fixation of acute high grade acromioclavicular joint disruption. J Orthop 16:133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosslenbroich SB, Schliemann B, Schneider KN et al (2015) Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a flip-button technique (MINAR): clinical and radiological midterm results. Am J Sports Med 43:1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515579179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Coale RM, Hollister SJ, Dines JS et al (2013) Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Koh KH, Shon MS, Choi NH, Lim TK (2018) Anatomic tunnel placement is not feasible by transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique for coracoclavicular reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 34:2012–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xue C, Zhang M, Zheng T-S et al (2013) Clavicle and coracoid process drilling technique for truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Injury 44:1314–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barth J, Duparc F, Baverel L et al (2015) Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:S305–S311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AE, GJ, JCK and R-ODH were responsible for conception and design of the study. AE, GJ, R-ODH and JCK were responsible for analysis and interpretation of data. AE and GJ drafted the article. HL, MA, KS, AE, GJ, JCK and R-ODH were responsible for final approval of the version to be submitted. MA and KS were responsible for acquisition of data. JCK, R-ODH and HL were responsible for revising the article critically for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunnar Jensen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Helmut Lill is consultant for Arthrex. Jan Christoph Katthagen and Alexander Ellwein received speaker’s honorarium from Arthrex. All other authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Consent to participate

All patients approved the study with written informed consent.

Ethical approval

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission der MHH, No 1207–2011) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, G., Dey Hazra, RO., Al-Ibadi, M. et al. Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 1185–1192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03271-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03271-6

Keywords

Navigation