Abstract
Purpose
Ballistic fractures of the femoral condyles are rare injuries with limited literature to help guide treatment. The purpose of this study is to report on the presentation, management, and outcomes for patients with isolated ballistic condylar fractures.
Methods
Eighteen patients between ages 16 and 65 with low-energy ballistic injuries isolated to the femoral condyles (OTA 33B) were included, 15 with CT imaging. Clinical records and imaging were reviewed, as well as treatment strategy. Fractures were classified by AO/OTA classification. Outcome and follow-up data were gathered at outpatient appointments and telephone calls.
Results
Of the 18 patients, 78% were treated operatively (61% with open reduction and internal fixation, 17% with removal of foreign body alone). There were two instances of traumatic vascular injury and no neurologic injuries. Furthermore, there were no identified infections. Only 58% of the patients had follow-up for more than 6 weeks with average KOOS Jr. Score of 50, and average VAS pain score of 5.2.
Conclusions
Ballistic femoral condyle fractures are rare Orthopaedic injuries seen in relatively high frequency at our institution. Most (78%) were treated operatively and with few complications. These fractures are not easily classified according to common classification schemes and may benefit from more rigorous study to guide treatment and anticipate outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uniform crime reporting handbook : UCR. In: Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. https://lccn.loc.gov/2004483104. Accessed 6 Oct 2020
Naghavi M, Marczak LB, Kutz M et al (2018) Global mortality from firearms, 1990–2016. JAMA 320:792–814. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10060
Gun Violence in Chicago (2016) UChicago Urban Labs. https://urbanlabs.uchicago.edu/projects/gun-violence-in-chicago-2016. Accessed 6 Oct 2020
Bartlett CS, Helfet DL, Hausman MR, Strauss E (2000) Ballistics and gunshot wounds: effects on musculoskeletal tissues. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:21–36. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200001000-00003
Seng VS, Masquelet AC (2013) Management of civilian ballistic fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:953–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.005
Gugala Z, Lindsey RW (2003) Classification of gunshot injuries in civilians. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200303000-00007
Gwathmey FW, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Kahler D et al (2010) Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:597–607. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201010000-00003
Nork SE, Segina DN, Aflatoon K et al (2005) The association between supracondylar-intercondylar distal femoral fractures and coronal plane fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:564–569. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.01751
Baker BJ, Escobedo EM, Nork SE, Henley MB (2002) Hoffa fracture: a common association with high-energy supracondylar fractures of the distal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:994. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780994
Lewis S, Pozo J, Muirhead-Allwood W (1989) Coronal fractures of the lateral femoral condyle. J Bone and Joint Surg British. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.71B1.2914979
Thakar C (2010) The Hoffa fracture–a fracture not to miss. Emerg Med J 27:391–392. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.087213
Bel J-C, Court C, Cogan A et al (2014) Unicondylar fractures of the distal femur. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.005
Bekkers JEJ, de Windt TS, Raijmakers NJH et al (2009) Validation of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17:1434–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.019
Lyman S, Lee Y-Y, Franklin PD et al (2016) Validation of the KOOS, JR: a short-form knee arthroplasty outcomes survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1
Agel J, Evans AR, Marsh JL et al (2013) The OTA open fracture classification: a study of reliability and agreement. J Orthop Trauma 27:6
Nguyen MP, Reich MS, OʼDonnell JA et al (2017) Infection and complications after low-velocity Intra-articular Gunshot Injuries. J Orthop Trauma 31:330–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000823
Portney DA, Reddy M, Baker HP et al (2021) Ballistic supracondylar distal femur fractures have lower rates of intra-articular extension than blunt distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 35:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002004
Dillman RO, Crumb CK, Lidsky MJ (1979) Lead poisoning from a gunshot wound. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Med 66:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(79)91083-0
Shultz CL, Schrader SN, Garbrecht EL et al (2019) Operative versus nonoperative management of traumatic arthrotomies from civilian gunshot wounds. Iowa Orthop J 39:173–177
Cantrell C, Gerlach E, Butler B et al (2020) The role of arthroscopy in bullet removal: a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop 22:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.09.019
Gitajn L, Perdue P, Hardcastle J, O’Toole RV (2014) Location of civilian ballistic femoral fracture indicates likelihood of arterial injury. Injury 45:1637–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.020
Abghari M, Monroy A, Schubl S et al (2015) Outcomes following low-energy civilian gunshot wound trauma to the lower extremities: results of a standard protocol at an Urban Trauma center. Iowa Orthop J 35:65–69
Collins DN, Temple SD (1989) Open joint injuries. Classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res pp. 48–56
Ganocy K, Lindsey RW (1998) The management of civilian intra-articular gunshot wounds: treatment considerations and proposal of a classification system. Injury 29 Suppl 1:SA1–6
Funding
There was no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors (Daniel Portney, Hayden Baker, Daryl Dillman, Jason Strelzow) declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Direct informed consent was waived in the IRB approval process given the retrospective nature of the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Portney, D.A., Baker, H.P., Stillson, Q.A. et al. Isolated ballistic femoral condyle fractures: a case series of eighteen patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 1091–1099 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03257-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03257-4