Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quotation errors related to the wound management of open lower limb fractures (WOLLF) randomized clinical trial

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the accuracy of quotations in the published literature of the Wound Management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (WOLLF) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify all citations of WOLLF from 2018 to 2021. Duplicate papers, non-English language papers, textbooks, technical tip videos, Ph.D. theses, and other grey literature were excluded from analysis. Eligible publications had their full text assessed by 2 independent reviewers who used a validated framework of error classification.

Results

We identified 62 original papers that met our eligibility criteria and referenced WOLLF. Of the 62 papers, 12 contained a quotation error (12/62, 19%). Errors were classified into major and minor. There were 7 major errors and 5 minor errors. The majority of quotation errors (7/12, 58%) occurred due to multi-referencing, where groups of references were used to support single assertions. There was substantial agreement between the two independent reviewers as determined by a Kappa coefficient of 0.761.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated a 19% quotation error rate in the literature regarding WOLLF. The majority were due to multi-referencing. We suggest that both authors and reviewers carefully check the source literature of key references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, Tutton E, Petrou S, Lamb SE et al (2018) Effect of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound management on 12-month disability among adults with severe open fractures of the lower limb: the WOLLF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:2280–2288. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.6452

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JH, Lee DH (2019) Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional management in open tibia fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 50(10):1764–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X, Zhang H, Cen S, Huang F (2018) Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound dressings in treatment of open fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 53:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. British Orthopaedic Association; British association of plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgeons (2009) Standard for trauma: BOAST 4: the management of severe open lower limb fractures. British Orthopaedic Association, London

  5. Ibrahim Y, Jamal S, Akhtar K (2021) The evidence base for 2017 BOAST-4 guidance on open fracture management: Are we due an update? J Clin Orthop Trauma 17:233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mogull SA (2017) Accuracy of cited “facts” in medical research articles: a review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22(3):276–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Hara NN, Mullins CD, Slobogean GP, Harris AD, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS (2021) Association of postoperative infections after fractures with long-term income among adults. JAMA Netw Open 4(4):e216673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6673

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ukai T, Hamahashi K, Uchiyama Y, Kobayashi Y, Watanabe M (2020) Retrospective analysis of risk factors for deep infection in lower limb Gustilo–Anderson type III fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 21(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00549-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Du Y, Baccaglini L, Johnson A, Puvvula J, Rautiainen RH (2021) Factors associated with musculoskeletal discomfort in farmers and ranchers in the US central states. J Agromed. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2021.1893880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao J, Liu Z, Ma D, Shen S, Wang X (2020) Modified usage of negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe deep fascial space infections in the head and neck. Infect Drug Resist 13:781–788. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S243794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Älgå A, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Lundgren KC, von Schreeb J et al (2020) Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: a pragmatic, multisite, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 8(3):e423–e429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30547-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cay P, Leung B, Curlewis K, Stone A, Roper T, Ricketts D (2021) Quotation errors related to the distal radius acute fracture fixation trial paper. J Hand Surg Eur. https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934211002985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Porrino JA Jr, Tan V, Daluiski A (2008) Misquotation of a commonly referenced hand surgery study. J Hand Surg Am 33(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagga R, Cay P, Ricketts D, Roper T, Phadnis J (2020) Quotation errors related to the proximal fracture of the humerus evaluation by randomization (ProFHER) study. Shoulder Elb. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573220950235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC et al (2015) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313(10):1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.1629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Rangan A, Edlin RP, Brown J et al (2011) UK DRAFFT: A randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:201. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo M, Li CC, Molina D 4th, Andersen CR, Panchbhavi VK (2013) Accuracy of citation and quotation in foot and ankle surgery journals. Foot Ankle Int 34(7):949–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713475354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davids JR, Weigl DM, Edmonds JP, Blackhurst DW (2010) Reference accuracy in peer-reviewed pediatric orthopaedic literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(5):1155–1161. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Buijze GA, Weening AA, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Ring D (2012) Predictors of the accuracy of quotation of references in peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature in relation to publications on the scaphoid. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94(2):276–280. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavlovic V, Weissgerber T, Stanisavljevic D et al (2021) How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature? Clin Sci (London) 135(5):671–681. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20201573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wager E, Middleton P (2008) Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000002.pub3

  24. Jergas H, Baethge C (2015) Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 3:e1364. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Armstrong MF, Conduff JH 3rd, Fenton JE, Coelho DH (2018) Reference errors in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 159(2):249–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818772521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reddy MS, Srinivas S, Sabanayagam N, Balasubramanian SP (2008) Accuracy of references in general surgical journals—an old problem revisited. Surgeon 6(2):71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80067-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Greenberg SA (2009) How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ 339:b2680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Keegan Curlewis

  2. Barts Heath NHS Trust, London, UK

    Brook Leung

  3. Audrey Emerton Building, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Rd, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK

    Lucy Sinclair, David Ricketts & Benedict Rogers

Authors
  1. Keegan Curlewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brook Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucy Sinclair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Ricketts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benedict Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keegan Curlewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curlewis, K., Leung, B., Sinclair, L. et al. Quotation errors related to the wound management of open lower limb fractures (WOLLF) randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 701–707 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03243-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03243-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation