Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What are the risk factors for complications after combined injury of the pelvic ring and acetabulum?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Combined acetabular and pelvic ring injuries represent a unique subset of pelvic trauma and little is known regarding their complications and outcomes. We sought to further evaluate these injury patterns and quantify their outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review at a single level 1 trauma center was performed on all patients with operatively treated combined ring and acetabulum injuries during a seven-year period. Main outcome measurements include all-cause complication including residual neurologic deficit, deep infection, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, deep venous thrombosis and mortality.

Results

Seventy operatively treated combined ring and acetabulum patients with one-year follow-up were reviewed. The overall complication rate was 44%. Hip dislocation occurred in 40% of the cohort and was significantly associated with residual neurologic deficit and all-cause complication. Angiography with embolization was not associated with an increased rate of deep infection. Open acetabular approaches had a significantly higher complication rate compared to percutaneous procedures. Delay to definitive fixation greater than 36 h trended toward but did not reach association with all complications.

Conclusion

Combined injuries to the acetabulum and pelvic ring have high rates of complications. No individual fracture patterns were identified as risk factors, but hip dislocation was associated with an increased rate of complications. When possible, percutaneous reduction and fixation of acetabular fractures and early definitive fracture fixation lead to lower rates of complications. Use of angiography with embolization appears to be safe and does not increase the risk of infection or other complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerbershagen HJ, Dagtekin O, Isenberg J, Martens N, Özgür E, Krep H, Sabatowski R, Petzke F (2010) Chronic pain and disability after pelvic and acetabular fractures—assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 69(1):128–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bbd703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong, S. J., Nicholson, J., Ahmed, I., Ning, A., & Keating, J. F. (2017, April). Long-term outcome following acetabular fractures associated with posterior hip dislocation. In Orthopaedic Proceedings (Vol. 99, No. SUPP_8, pp. 51–51). The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

  3. Oransky M, Tortora M (2007) Nonunions and malunions after pelvic fractures: why they occur and what can be done? Injury 38(4):489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ochenjele G, Reid KR, Castillo RC et al (2018) Predictors of Unplanned Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries. J Orthop Trauma 32(7):e245–e250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Letournel, E., & Judet, R. (2012). Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer Science & Business Media.

  6. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM (2012) Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. JBJS 94(17):1559–1567. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elzohairy MM, Salama AM (2017) Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(2):223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Porter SE, Russell GV, Dews RC, Qin Z, Woodall J Jr, Graves ML (2008) Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Orthop Trauma 22(9):589–594. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188d6c3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, Ellison TS, Ellison PS Jr, Poka A, Bathon GH, Brumback RJ (1990) Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 30(7):848–856 (PMID: 2381002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magnussen RA, Tressler MA, Obremskey WT, Kregor PJ (2007) Predicting blood loss in isolated pelvic and acetabular high-energy trauma. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):603–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181599c27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, Bilaniuk JW, Collier BR, Como J, Holevar M, Sabater EA, Sems SA, Vassy WM, Wynne JL (2011) Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture—update and systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 71(6):1850–1868. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dca9a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki T, Smith WR, Hak DJ, Stahel PF, Baron AJ, Gillani SA, Morgan SJ (2010) Combined injuries of the pelvis and acetabulum: nature of a devastating dyad. J Orthop Trauma 24(5):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca32af

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Halvorson JJ, LaMothe J, Martin CR, Grose A, Asprinio DE, Wellman D, Helfet DL (2014) Combined acetabulum and pelvic ring injuries. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 22(5):304–314. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-05-304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Osgood GM, Manson TT, O’toole, R. V., & Turen, C. H. (2013) Combined pelvic ring disruption and acetabular fracture: associated injury patterns in 40 patients. J Orthop Trauma 27(5):243–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826c2751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker SP, o’Neill, B., Haddon Jr, W., & Long, W. B. (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 14(3):187–196 (PMID: 4814394)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vallier HA, Dolenc AJ, Moore TA (2016) Early appropriate care: a protocol to standardize resuscitation assessment and to expedite fracture care reduces hospital stay and enhances revenue. J Orthop Trauma 30(6):306–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallier HA, Wang X, Moore TA, Wilber JH, Como JJ (2013) Timing of orthopaedic surgery in multiple trauma patients: development of a protocol for early appropriate care. J Orthop Trauma 27(10):543–551. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829efda1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vallier HA, Moore TA, Como JJ, Wilczewski PA, Steinmetz MP, Wagner KG, Smith CE, Wang XF, Dolenc AJ (2015) Complications are reduced with a protocol to standardize timing of fixation based on response to resuscitation. J Orthop Surg Res 10(1):155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0298-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nahm NJ, Como JJ, Wilber JH, Vallier HA (2011) Early appropriate care: definitive stabilization of femoral fractures within 24 hours of injury is safe in most patients with multiple injuries. J Orthop Trauma 71(1):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181fc93a2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Firoozabadi R, Little M, Alton T, Scoloro J, Agel J, Kogut M (2017) Does Pelvic Embolization Increase Infection Rates in Patients Who Undergo Open Treatment of Acetabular Fractures? J Orthop Trauma 31(4):185–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindvall E, Davis J, Martirosian A, Garcia G, Husak L (2018) Bilateral Internal Iliac Artery Embolization Results in an Unacceptably High Rate of Complications in Patients Requiring Pelvic/Acetabular Surgery. J Orthop Trauma 32(9):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sagi HC, Dziadosz D, Mir H, Virani N, Olson C (2013) Obesity, leukocytosis, embolization, and injury severity increase the risk for deep postoperative wound infection after pelvic and acetabular surgery. J Orthop Trauma 27(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825cf382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaskulka, R. A., Fischer, G., & Fenzl, G. (1991). Dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume73(3), 465–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670451

  24. Giannoudis, P. V., Grotz, M. R. W., Papakostidis, C., & Dinopoulos, H. (2005). Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum: a meta-analysis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume87(1), 2–9. PMID: 15686228

  25. Itsubo T, Fukushima N, Kakegawa A, Yokouchi K, Kawagishi K, Kato H, Moriizumi T (2012) Effects of repeated crush injuries on motor functional recovery of the sciatic nerve. Neurol Res 34(9):908–914. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Spitler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors report no conflict of interest with this work.

Ethical approval

Institutional IRB approval was obtained for this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunningham, B., Pearson, J., McGwin, G. et al. What are the risk factors for complications after combined injury of the pelvic ring and acetabulum?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 341–346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03189-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03189-5

Keywords

Navigation