Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of acute versus delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Post-traumatic arthritis is known complication following acetabular fracture. The aim was to compare mid- to long-term outcomes of acute THA (aTHA) for acetabular fracture and delayed THA (dTHA) following failure of ORIF or conservative management.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 60 THA (21 aTHA; 39 dTHA) performed for acetabular fracture between 2004 and 2014 in 60 patients with a mean age of 59 years (20–94). Functional and Radiographic outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 5 years (2–13) utilizing Oxford, Harris Hip (HHS), and Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) scores and Brooker classification.

Results

The mean HHS (73), Oxford (32) and PMA (12) scores were significantly lower in the aTHA group. Acute THA was significantly associated with lower postoperative Oxford (β = −4.2), HHS (β = −7.8), and PMA (β = −2.2) scores at mean 5 years (2–13). Eleven patients returned to the operating room. There were no significant differences between THA performed in acute or delayed fashion. The two primary reasons for revision were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 5) and aseptic loosening (n = 4). Survivorship free from reoperation at 10 years was 91% and 82% for aTHA and dTHA, respectively (p = 0.24). Increased PMA scores were associated with decreased overall survival of the THA free from reoperation (HR = 0.60). The degree of heterotopic ossification was significantly higher in the aTHA group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Acute THA in the setting of acetabular fracture is a technically challenging procedure. However, in the present series, aTHA provided satisfactory immediate stability and good survivorship at 10 years in a medically vulnerable patient population.

Level of Evidence

Level 3; Therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Regarding the French law (Jardé, 18Nov2016, https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/systeme-de-sante-et-medico-social/recherche-et-innovation/recherches-impliquant-la-personne-humaine/), retrospective data collection does not require the approval of an IRB. Data protection was maintained as all the data have been collected in agreement with an appropriate procedure in the University Hospital of Toulouse.

References

  1. Mauffrey C, Hao J, Cuellar DO et al (2014) The epidemiology and injury patterns of acetabular fractures: are the USA and China comparable? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3462-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, Matta JM (2010) Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:250–257. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarre P, Gabbe BJ, Griffin XL et al (2020) Outcomes following operatively managed acetabular fractures in patients aged 60 years and older. Bone Jt J 102-B:1735–1742. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0728.R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87:2–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang C-P (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khoshbin A, Hoit G, Henry PDG et al (2021) Risk of total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation: the importance of age. J Arthroplasty 36:3194-3199.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luengo-Alonso G, Ibarguen ANT, Peinado MA et al (2021) Predictor variables in acetabular fractures surgically treated. Injury 52(Suppl 4):S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cichos KH, Spitler CA, Quade JH et al (2021) Fracture and patient characteristics associated with early conversion total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sierra RJ, Mabry TM, Sems SA, Berry DJ (2013) Acetabular fractures: the role of total hip replacement. Bone Jt J 95-B:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H et al (2019) The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29:1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02453-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sermon A, Broos P, Vanderschot P (2008) Total hip replacement for acetabular fractures. Results in 121 patients operated between 1983 and 2003. Injury 39:914–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martell JM, Pierson RH, Jacobs JJ et al (1993) Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 75:554–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Bellis UG, Legnani C, Calori GM (2013) Acute total hip replacement for acetabular fractures. A systematic review of the literature. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott CEH, MacDonald D, Moran M et al (2017) Cemented total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture. Bone Jt J 99-B:1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2016-1261.R2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Romness DW, Lewallen DG (1990) Total hip arthroplasty after fracture of the acetabulum. Long-term results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 72-B:761–764. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.72b5.2211750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD et al (2001) Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:868–876. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200106000-00008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ranawat A, Zelken J, Helfet D, Buly R (2009) Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture. J Arthroplasty 24:759–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mears DC, Velyvis JH (2002) Acute total hip arthroplasty for selected displaced acetabular fractures: two to twelve-year results. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Darrith B, Courtney PM, Valle Della CJ (2018) Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Jt J 100-B:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke-Jenssen J, Røise O, Storeggen SAØ, Madsen JE (2017) Long-term survival and risk factors for failure of the native hip joint after operatively treated displaced acetabular fractures. Bone Jt J 99-B:834–840. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1013.R1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liaw F, Govilkar S, Banks D et al (2020) Primary total hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages for acetabular fractures. Hip Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020957642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Borens O et al (2004) Cable fixation and early total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. J Arthroplasty 19:344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Borg T, Hernefalk B, Hailer NP (2019) Acute total hip arthroplasty combined with internal fixation for displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: a short-term comparison with internal fixation alone after a minimum of two years. Bone Jt J 101-B:478–483. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1027.R2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Daurka JS, Pastides PS, Lewis A et al (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Jt J 96-B:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ashok S, Gavaskar MO, Hitesh Gopalan MO, Bhupesh Karthik MO et al (2016) Delayed total hip arthroplasty for failed acetabular fractures: The influence of initial fracture management on outcome after arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostrowka C, Bonhomme S, Jouffroy P, Riouallon G (2018) Evaluation of venous thromboembolic complications in patients operated on for pelvic fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffin SM, Sims SH, Karunakar MA et al (2013) Heterotopic ossification rates after acetabular fracture surgery are unchanged without indomethacin prophylaxis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2776–2782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2871-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghalambor N, Matta JM, Bernstein L (1994) Heterotopic ossification following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. An analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bosse MJ, Poka A, Reinert CM et al (1988) Heterotopic ossification as a complication of acetabular fracture. Prophylaxis with low-dose irradiation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 70:1231–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rath EMS, Russell GV, Washington WJ, Routt MLC (2002) Gluteus minimus necrotic muscle debridement diminishes heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture fixation. Injury 33:751–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. None of the authors, or any member of their family, have received any financial remuneration related to the subject of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G. Gracia contributed to conception and design, data acquisition, critical revisions, manuscript review, and study supervision. P. Laumonerie contributed to conception and design, analysis and interpretation, critical revisions, manuscript review, statistical analysis, and study supervision. M. E. Tibbo, E. Cavaignac, and P. Chiron contributed to critical revisions and manuscript review. N. Reina contributed to critical revisions, manuscript review, and administration and approved final version of paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gracia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified herein.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gracia, G., Laumonerie, P., Tibbo, M.E. et al. Outcomes of acute versus delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 51–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03157-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03157-z

Keywords

Navigation