Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fibula nail fixation in ankle fractures with significant soft tissue compromise: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Intramedullary fixation of lateral malleolar fractures has increased in popularity recently with the introduction of the fibula nail. It has been proposed as an alternative fixation method in fractures to minimise soft tissue injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of those who had an ankle fracture with concurrent significant soft tissue damage, treated with a fibula nail.

Methods

Details of patients who were managed at our institution using a fibula nail were obtained from the trauma database. The Acumed Fibula Rod System (FRS) was used in all cases. Those who were less than 12 months following injury were excluded. Patients attended a follow-up clinic for measurement of range of movement, radiographs, and to complete MOX-FQ and EQ-5D questionnaires.

Results

Twenty patients were identified. Eleven attended for review in person, and a further eight completed questionnaires (questionnaire response rate 95%). The mean age was 59 years (range 19–91). Twelve fractures were open, all of which were initially managed using an external fixator. One patient developed deep infection necessitating fusion. The mean MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores were 53.6 and 0.649, respectively, at a median of 40 months post-injury. The mean EQ-VAS was 70. The range of movement of the affected side was significantly less than the unaffected side (p < 0.001 on paired t-test).

Conclusion

This study suggests that the FRS offers a reliable and acceptable alternative fixation technique for patients who have significant soft tissue injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult Ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoiness P, Engebretsen L, Stromsoe K (2001) The influence of perioperative soft tissue complications on the clinical outcome in surgically treated ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 22(8):642–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, Gurbani B, Ko CY, Zingmond DS (2009) Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(5):1042–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson SA, Li X, Franklin P, Wixted JJ (2008) Ankle fractures in the elderly: initial and long-term outcomes. Foot Ankle Int 29:1184–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bugler KE, Watson CD, Hardie AR et al (2012) The treatment of unstable fractures of the ankle using the Acumed fibula nail: development of a technique. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 94-B:1107–1112

  6. Asloum Y, Bedin B, Roger T et al (2014) Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. White TO, Bugler KE, Appleton PT, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM (2016) A prospective, randomised controlled trial of a fibula nail versus standard open reduction and internal fixation for fixation of ankle fractures in elderly patients. Bone Jt J 98-B(9):1248–1252

  8. Smith G, Mackenzie SP, Wallace RJ, Carter T, White TO (2017) Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary fibula nail versus plate and screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 38(12):1394–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Switaj PJ, Fuchs D, Alshouli M, Patwardhan AG, Voronov LI, Muriuki M, Havey RM, Kadakia AR (2016) A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibula nail and distal fibula locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):100

  10. Appleton PT, White T (2014) Acumed Fibula Rod System Surgical Technique. Acumed LLC

  11. Keene DJ, Mistry D, Nam J, Tutton E et al (2016) The Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial: a pragmatic, multicentre, equivalence randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation comparing close contact casting with open surgical reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients aged over 60 years. Health Technol Assess 20(75):1–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P, Jenkinson C (2011) The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. Foot (Edinb) 21(2):92–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morley D, Jenkinson C, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P, Dawson J (2013) The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) development and validation of a summary index score. Bone Jt Res 2:66–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208 (1990)

  15. Simske N, Audet M, Kim CY, Vallier H (2019) Open ankle fractures are associated with complications and reoperations. Orthop Trauma Assoc 2(4):e042

  16. Jordan RW, Chapman AWP, Buchanan D, Makrides P (2018) The role of intramedullary fixation in ankle fractures—A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg 24(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karkkola S, Kortekangas T, Pakarinen H, Flinkkilä T, Leskelä HV, Niinimäki J (2019) Fibula nailing for fixation of ankle fractures in patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. Foot Ankle Surg 26:784–789

  18. Dabash S, Eisenstein ED, Potter E, Kusnezov N, Thabet AM, Abdelgawad AA (2019) Unstable ankle fracture fixation using locked fibula intramedullary nail in high-risk patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 58(2):357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ashman BD, Kong C, Wing KJ, Penner MJ, Bugler KE, White TO, Younger ASE (2016) Fluoroscopy-guided reduction and fibula nail fixation to manage unstable ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. Bone Joint J 98-B:1197–1201

  20. Faber RM, Parry JA, Haidukewych GH, Koval KJ, Langford JL (2021) Complications after fibula intramedullary nail fixation of pilon versus ankle fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 7(16):75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Obaidi B, Wiik AV, Bhattacharyya R, Mushtaq, Bhattacharya R (2019) Fibular nails for open and closed ankle fractures: results from a non-designer level I major trauma centre. J Orthop Surg 27(1):1–6

  22. Appleton P, McQueen M, Court-Brown C (2006) The fibula nail for treatment of ankle fractures in elderly and high risk patients. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 5(3):204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bugler KE, Watson CD, Hardie AR, Appleton P, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM, White TO (2012) The treatment of unstable fractures of the ankle using the Acumed fibula nail. J Bone Jt Surg 94-B(8):1107–1112

  24. Van Leeuwen CT, Hoffman RP, Hoogendoorn JM (2019) Long-term outcome in operatively and non-operatively treated isolated type B fibula fractures. Injury J 50(120):2318–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah NH, Sundaram RO, Velusamy A, Braithwaite RJ (2007) Five-year functional outcome analysis of ankle fracture fixation. Injury J 38(11):1308–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jain S, Haughton BA, Brew C (2014) Intramedullary fixation of distal fibula fractures: a systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol 15:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goss DA, Reb CW, Philbin TM (2017) Anatomic structures at risk when utilising an intramedullary nail for distal fibula fractures: a cafaveric study. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):916–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M (2002) Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people: finnish statistics during 1970–2000 and projections for the future. Bone 31(3):430–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Murray.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publication of this article.

Availability of data and material

Data can be provided upon request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brewer, P., Murray, J., Barr, L. et al. Fibula nail fixation in ankle fractures with significant soft tissue compromise: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 1257–1263 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03088-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03088-9

Keywords

Navigation