Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma care in the United Kingdom: Guidelines, registries, carrots and sticks

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the United Kingdom (UK), orthopaedic trauma surgeons utilise evidence-based practice through distillation of high-quality primary research, interrogation of registries and implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Concurrent with this ambition of providing exemplar care based on robust patient centred research, there has evolved a culture of remuneration ‘by results’. Therefore, there is a drive for excellence combined with a system of collation and validation of data input as well as remuneration where care excels. There are several organisations involved in each stage of this process, the output of which has much that is pertinent to the globally similar consequences of physical injury. However, their relevance and impact within the UK is magnified as they are written against the backdrop of a unified healthcare system. In this article, we will describe the roles of the different organisations guiding and regulating trauma practice across the UK and discuss how the interplay of these impacts on clinical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2007) Trauma : Who cares? , https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2007t.html

  3. Moran CG, Lecky F, Bouamra O et al (2018) Changing the system—major trauma patients and their outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008–17. EClinicalMedicine 2:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al (1999) Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 318:727–730. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. History of NICE [Internet], https://www.nice.org.uk/about/who-we-are/history-of-nice (Accessed 3 Oct 2020)

  6. Excellence NIfHaC (2013) Factsheet 1: How NICE develops clinical guidelines and what documents we publish, https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/About/NICE-Communities/Public-involvement/Developing-NICE-guidance/Factsheet-1-contribute-to-developing-clinical-guidelines.pdf (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2020) Developing NICE guidelines: the manual Process and method [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/introduction

  8. British Orthopaedic Association (2020) Trauma BOASTs, https://www.boa.ac.uk/standards-guidance/boasts/trauma-boasts.html (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  9. NHS Wales (2006) Using protocols, standards, policies and guidelines to enhance confidence and career development, http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/861/Wipp%20Using%20Protocols%2Cstandards%2C%20policies%20and%20guidelines.pdf (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  10. British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) (2020) Open fracture management. Injury 51:174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, British Orthopaedic Association and British Geriatric Society (2015) Safety guideline: reducing the risk from cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture 2015. Anaesthesia 70:623–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Hip Fracture Database (2019) NHFD Annual Report 2019

  13. The Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) (2020) About TARN, https://www.tarn.ac.uk/Content.aspx?ca=2 (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  14. National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) (2016) Major Trauma: assessment and initial management. Appendix N, TARN: Background and statistical techniques considered for analysis. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE Guideline, No. 39.)

  15. Maling LC, Gray-Stephens CE, Malik-Tabassum K, Weiner OJ, Marples MR, Faria GP, et al (2020) The National Hip Fracture Database is only as good as the data we feed it - significant inaccuracy demonstrated and how to improve it. Injury [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138320308998

  16. Lockey DJ (2018) Improved trauma outcomes after the introduction of a trauma system in England. EClinicalMedicine 2:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore L, Clark DE (2008) The value of trauma registries. Injury 39:686–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heinänen M, Brinck T, Lefering R et al (2019) How to validate data quality in a trauma registry? the helsinki trauma registry internal audit. Scand J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496919883961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cundall-Curry DJ, Lawrence JE, Fountain DM et al (2016) Data errors in the national hip fracture database: a local validation study. Bone Jt J 98(B):1406–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maling LC, Gray-Stephens CEB, Malik-Tabassum K et al (2020) The national hip fracture database is only as good as the data we feed it—significant inaccuracy demonstrated and how to improve it. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kosy JD, Kassam AA, Hockings M (2013) National joint registry data inaccuracy: a threat to proper reporting. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 74:691–693. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2013.74.12.691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A et al (2015) The REporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kehoe A, Smith JE, Edwards A et al (2015) The changing face of major trauma in the UK. Emerg Med J 32:911–915. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-205265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Herron J, Hutchinson R, Lecky F et al (2017) The impact of age on major orthopaedic trauma: an analysis of the United Kingdom Trauma Audit Research Network database. Bone Jt J 99(B):1677–1680. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2016-1140.R2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coats TJ, Fragoso-Iñiguez M, Roberts I (2019) Implementation of tranexamic acid for bleeding trauma patients: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Emerg Med J 36:78–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Abri R (2007) Managing change in healthcare. Oman Med J 22:9–10

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oakley B, Nightingale J, Moran C et al (2017) Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study. BMJ Open 7:e014190. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. NHS England and NHS Improvement (2020/21) National tariff payment system—a consultation notice: Annex DtD Guidance on best practice tariffs, https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/484/Annex_DtD_Best_practice_tariffs.pdf (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  29. National Hip Fracture Database (2020) Best practice tariff, https://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/nhfdcharts.nsf/vwInfo/Bestpractice (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  30. Gerschlick B (2016) Best practice tariffs. Country background note: United Kingdom (England), https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Better-Ways-to-Pay-for-Health-Care-Background-Note-England-Best-practice-tariffs.pdf (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  31. Metcalfe D, Zogg CK, Judge A et al (2019) Pay for performance and hip fracture outcomes. Bone Jt J 101(B):1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2019-0173.R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitaker SR, Nisar S, Scally AJ et al (2019) Does achieving the ‘best practice tariff’ criteria for fractured neck of femur patients improve one year outcomes? Injury 50:1358–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lisk RYK (2014) Reducing mortality from hip fractures: a systematic quality improvement programme. BMJ Open Qual 3(u205006):w202103. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u205006.w2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. BOAST Committee (2020) British Orthopaedic Association’s Standards for Trauma (BOAST): Care of the older or frail patient with orthopaedic injuries. Injury 51:1419–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The Trauma Audit and Research Network (2019) Data entry system update, www.tarn.ac.uk (Accessed 9 Nov 2020)

  36. Bommireddy L, Leow TW, Gogna R, Clark DI (2020) Should femoral shaft fractures in patients age over 60 years be managed using a hip fracture pathway? Injury [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138320307944

  37. Excellence NIfHaC (2018). NICEimpact: falls and fragility fractures

  38. National Hip Fracture Database (2020). Detection and management of mortality outliers for the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), https://www.nhfd.co.uk/files/2019ReportFiles/NHFD_Outlier_Policy_2019_v2.pdf (Accessed 9 Nov 2020).

  39. The Trauma Audit and Research Network (2020) Detection and Management of Outliers, https://www.tarn.ac.uk/content/downloads/53/Outlier%20Policy%202020.pdf (Accessed 9 Nov 2020)

  40. (GIRFT) Girft (2020) GIRFT methodology, https://www.gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/girft-methodology/ (Accessed 9 Nov 2020)

  41. Davenport RA, Tai N, West A et al (2010) A major trauma centre is a specialty hospital not a hospital of specialties. Br J Surg 97:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. National Hip Fracture Database. About the National Hip Fracture Database, https://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/NHFDcharts.nsf/docs/About (Accessed 8 Nov 2020)

  43. Wordsworth M, Lawton G, Nathwani D et al (2016) Improving the care of patients with severe open fractures of the tibia: the effect of the introduction of major trauma networks and national guidelines. Bone Jt J 98(B):420–424. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.35818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shepherd KL, Sagar C, Harwood PJ et al (2017) Open tibial fractures: Has a major trauma centre improved management measured by BOAST-4 guidelines? OrthopProc 99(B):19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received in support of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Griffiths.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

A. Trompeter is Deputy Editor for EJOST.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffiths, A., Dixon, J., Egglestone, A. et al. Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma care in the United Kingdom: Guidelines, registries, carrots and sticks. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 937–945 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02954-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02954-w

Keywords

Navigation