Abstract
Purpose
Exchange nailing is widely used for the management of aseptic femoral and tibial non-union. Compressive forces markedly reduce strain, increasing rate and incidence of union. Additional compressive forces can be applied to the non-union site by using the design features of some modern nailing systems. This study hypothesises that the use of additional compression in exchange nailing results in faster time to union.
Methods
All femoral and tibial shaft non-unions were identified over a 4-year period between 2014–2018. Intraoperative compression during exchange nailing was either applied or not applied with a dedicated active compression device through the intramedullary nail.
An initial ‘radiographic union score for tibia’ (RUST) score was calculated from preoperative lateral and AP radiographs and compared with the postoperative radiographs at 6–8 weeks. Healing was defined as bridging callus on at least three cortices (RUST > 10).
Results
A total of 119 patients were identified. Following application of exclusion criteria, we analysed data for 19 patients, 10 undergoing exchange nailing with intraoperative compression and 9 without. The pre-exchange RUST score was comparable between the compressed group and standard exchange group with mean of 7.11 versus 7.5 (p = 0.636). At 6–8 weeks post-op, there was a significant difference between the median RUST score in the compressed group vs standard exchange group, 11 compared to 8.39 (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Our study shows that time to union was accelerated when additional compression was applied to exchange nailing, resulting in reduced follow-up visits and number of radiographs required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
COT Society (2003) Nonunion following intramedullary nailing of the femur with and without reaming. Results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11):2093–2096 (in eng)
Wolinsky PR, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K (1999) Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases. J Trauma 46(3):392–399 (in eng)
Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ (2009) Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(5):296–305 (in eng)
Winquist RA, Hansen ST, Clawson DK (2001) Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. 1984. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(12):1912 (in eng)
Brinker MR, O’Connor DP (2007) Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(1):177–188. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00742
Hierholzer C et al (2014) Reamed intramedullary exchange nailing: treatment of choice of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion. J Orthop Surg Res 9:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0088-1
Browner BD (2009) Skeletal trauma : basic science, management, and reconstruction, 4th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, Edinburgh
Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 32(1):S1–S170. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063
Whelan DB et al (2010) Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 68(3):629–632. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d
Leow JM, Clement ND, Tawonsawatruk T, Simpson CJ, Simpson AH (2016) The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre. Bone Joint Res 5(4):116–121. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000628 (in eng)
Tsang ST, Mills LA, Frantzias J, Baren JP, Keating JF, Simpson AH (2016) Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia: our results and an analysis of the risk factors for failure. Bone Joint J 98-B(4):534–541. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.34870 (in eng)
Elliott DS et al (2016) A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion: BHN theory. Bone Joint J 98-B(7):884–891 (in eng)
Penzkofer R et al (2009) Influence of intramedullary nail diameter and locking mode on the stability of tibial shaft fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(4):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0700-0 (in eng)
Vaughn JE, Shah RV, Samman T, Stirton J, Liu J, Ebraheim NA (2018) Systematic review of dynamization. World J Orthop 9(7):92–99. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i7.92 (in eng)
Funding
No funding was received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The senior author on this paper (Mr Alex Trompeter) has to declare Paid services for Stryker (education and R + D) and Smith and Nephew and Orthofix (Education). No COI relating to this work. No payments for this work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weil, S., Fontalis, A., Guessoum, M. et al. Augmented compression in exchange nailing for femoral and tibial non-unions accelerates time to radiographic union. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 931–936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02900-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02900-w