Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study identifies the most impactful papers on scapholunate reconstruction and provides a quantitative assessment of the impact of these papers in order to inform future clinical practice, education, and research of this condition.

Methods

The Scopus database was used in May 2020 to identify the 50 most cited clinical articles pertaining solely to chronic scapholunate reconstruction. Citation number and density, publication variables, and Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs) were collected and analyzed.

Results

The top 50 articles on chronic scapholunate reconstruction produced 1,868 total citations, with an average of 37.36 ± 39.90 citations per article (range 7–196) and an average citation density of 2.44 ± 2.27. US-based publications (n = 20) and articles published in Journal of Hand Surgery (n = 24) were associated with significantly higher citation number and density (p < 0.01 – p = 0.018). In addition, sample size was positively correlated with citation density (rho = 0.312, p = 0.029). Fourteen articles were associated with an AAS (mean score = 4.07 ± 4.70). There was no significant association between AAS and citation number or density, but AAS did significantly predict citation density (coefficient = 0.378, 95% CI: [0.013–0.741], p = 0.043).

Conclusion

Numerous factors, such as journal of publication, location, and sample size, were significantly associated with citation number and/or citation density. Interestingly, AAS was predictive of, but not directly correlated with citation density, suggesting that the impact of scapholunate literature may not be adequately captured with a citation analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh JJ, Berger RA, Cooney WP (2002) Current status of scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:32–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahl JW, Huang JI (2015) Chronic scapholunate ligament injuries: treatment with supplemental fixation. Hand Clin 31:457–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Larsen CF, Amadio PC, Gilula LA, Hodge JC (1995) Analysis of carpal instability: I. Description of the scheme. J Hand Surg Am. 20:757–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hom S, Ruby LK (1991) Attempted scapholunate arthrodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Am 16:334–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delétang F, Segret J, Dap F, Dautel G (2011) Chronic scapholunate instability treated by scaphocapitate fusion: a midterm outcome perspective. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:164–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleinman WB, Carroll C (1990) Scapho-trapezio-trapezoid arthrodesis for treatment of chronic static and dynamic scapho-lunate instability: a 10-year perspective on pitfalls and complications. J Hand Surg Am 15:408–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chabas J-F, Gay A, Valenti D, Guinard D, Legre R (2008) Results of the modified Brunelli tenodesis for treatment of scapholunate instability: a retrospective study of 19 patients. J Hand Surg Am 33:1469–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nienstedt F (2013) Treatment of static scapholunate instability with modified Brunelli tenodesis: results over 10 years. J Hand Surg Am 38:887–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss AP (1998) Scapholunate ligament reconstruction using a bone-retinaculum-bone autograft. J Hand Surg Am 23:205–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf JM, Weiss AP (2001) Bone-retinaculum-bone reconstruction of scapholunate ligament injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 32:241–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deshmukh SC, Givissis P, Belloso D, Stanley JK, Trail IA (1999) Blatt’s capsulodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Br 24:215–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moran SL, Cooney WP, Berger RA, Strickland J (2005) Capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg Am 30:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gajendran VK, Peterson B, Slater RR, Szabo RM (2007) Long-term outcomes of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Am 32:1323–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Szabo RM, Slater RR, Palumbo CF, Gerlach T (2002) Dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for chronic, static scapholunate dissociation: clinical results. J Hand Surg Am 27:978–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Michelotti BF, Adkinson JM, Chung KC (2015) Chronic scapholunate ligament injury: techniques in repair and reconstruction. Hand Clin 31:437–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheek J, Garnham B, Quan J (2006) What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res 16:423–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piolanti N, Poggetti A, Nucci AM et al (2018) The 50 most cited articles about wrist surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 10:7715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lum ZC, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Meehan JP (2020) Top 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery: an update. J Orthop 19:132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eberlin KR, Labow BI, Upton J, Taghinia AH (2012) High-impact articles in hand surgery. Hand 7:157–162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. To P, Atkinson CT, Lee DH, Pappas ND (2013) The most cited articles in hand surgery over the past 20-plus years: a modern-day reading list. J Hand Surg Am 38:983–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K, Huffman GR, Glaser D (2012) Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1796–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Altmetric Attention Score (2020) Altmetric. https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated. Accessed 29 Oct 2020

  23. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature I. How to get started the evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA 270(2093):5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Elias M, Lluch AL, Stanley JK (2006) Three-ligament tenodesis for the treatment of scapholunate dissociation: indications and surgical technique. J Hand Surg Am 31:125–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Links AC, Chin SH, Waitayawinyu T, Trumble TE (2008) Scapholunate interosseous ligament reconstruction: results with a modified Brunelli technique versus four-bone weave. J Hand Surg Am 33:850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujihara Y, Fujihara N, Yamamoto M, Hirata H (2019) Citation analysis of articles about hand surgery published in orthopaedic and hand surgery journals. J Hand Surg Asian-Pacific 24:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Probst P, Zaschke S, Heger P et al (2019) Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kukla R (2007) Resituating the principle of equipoise: justice and access to care in non-ideal conditions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 17:171–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Truog RD (1999) Informed consent and research design in critical care medicine. Crit Care 3:R29-33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmad T, Chinoy MA, Tayyab M (2014) Using levels of evidence to compare clinical impact from research. J Evid Based Med 7:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gami AS, Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB (2004) Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. CMAJ 170:1925–1927

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received in support of this study. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. KHL performed the literature search; KHL, HH, JSK, WA and SMK performed the data analysis; and KHL, HH, JSK, WA and SMK drafted and/or critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven M. Koehler.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Steven Koehler is a committee member of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), a paid consultant and speaker for Integra Life Sciences, Inc, a paid consultant for Tissium, Inc., a stockholder and member of the medical advisory board for Reactiv, Inc., a member of the advisory board for Androes, LLC, and a speaker for TriMed, Inc. KHL, HH, JSK, and WA declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not sought for the present study because no patient data was collected.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levy, K.H., Huddleston, H., Kurtzman, J.S. et al. The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 995–1004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02864-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02864-3

Keywords

Navigation