Abstract
Purpose
This study identifies the most impactful papers on scapholunate reconstruction and provides a quantitative assessment of the impact of these papers in order to inform future clinical practice, education, and research of this condition.
Methods
The Scopus database was used in May 2020 to identify the 50 most cited clinical articles pertaining solely to chronic scapholunate reconstruction. Citation number and density, publication variables, and Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs) were collected and analyzed.
Results
The top 50 articles on chronic scapholunate reconstruction produced 1,868 total citations, with an average of 37.36 ± 39.90 citations per article (range 7–196) and an average citation density of 2.44 ± 2.27. US-based publications (n = 20) and articles published in Journal of Hand Surgery (n = 24) were associated with significantly higher citation number and density (p < 0.01 – p = 0.018). In addition, sample size was positively correlated with citation density (rho = 0.312, p = 0.029). Fourteen articles were associated with an AAS (mean score = 4.07 ± 4.70). There was no significant association between AAS and citation number or density, but AAS did significantly predict citation density (coefficient = 0.378, 95% CI: [0.013–0.741], p = 0.043).
Conclusion
Numerous factors, such as journal of publication, location, and sample size, were significantly associated with citation number and/or citation density. Interestingly, AAS was predictive of, but not directly correlated with citation density, suggesting that the impact of scapholunate literature may not be adequately captured with a citation analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walsh JJ, Berger RA, Cooney WP (2002) Current status of scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:32–42
Dahl JW, Huang JI (2015) Chronic scapholunate ligament injuries: treatment with supplemental fixation. Hand Clin 31:457–465
Larsen CF, Amadio PC, Gilula LA, Hodge JC (1995) Analysis of carpal instability: I. Description of the scheme. J Hand Surg Am. 20:757–64
Hom S, Ruby LK (1991) Attempted scapholunate arthrodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Am 16:334–339
Delétang F, Segret J, Dap F, Dautel G (2011) Chronic scapholunate instability treated by scaphocapitate fusion: a midterm outcome perspective. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:164–171
Kleinman WB, Carroll C (1990) Scapho-trapezio-trapezoid arthrodesis for treatment of chronic static and dynamic scapho-lunate instability: a 10-year perspective on pitfalls and complications. J Hand Surg Am 15:408–414
Chabas J-F, Gay A, Valenti D, Guinard D, Legre R (2008) Results of the modified Brunelli tenodesis for treatment of scapholunate instability: a retrospective study of 19 patients. J Hand Surg Am 33:1469–1477
Nienstedt F (2013) Treatment of static scapholunate instability with modified Brunelli tenodesis: results over 10 years. J Hand Surg Am 38:887–892
Weiss AP (1998) Scapholunate ligament reconstruction using a bone-retinaculum-bone autograft. J Hand Surg Am 23:205–215
Wolf JM, Weiss AP (2001) Bone-retinaculum-bone reconstruction of scapholunate ligament injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 32:241–246
Deshmukh SC, Givissis P, Belloso D, Stanley JK, Trail IA (1999) Blatt’s capsulodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Br 24:215–220
Moran SL, Cooney WP, Berger RA, Strickland J (2005) Capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg Am 30:16–23
Gajendran VK, Peterson B, Slater RR, Szabo RM (2007) Long-term outcomes of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation. J Hand Surg Am 32:1323–1333
Szabo RM, Slater RR, Palumbo CF, Gerlach T (2002) Dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for chronic, static scapholunate dissociation: clinical results. J Hand Surg Am 27:978–984
Michelotti BF, Adkinson JM, Chung KC (2015) Chronic scapholunate ligament injury: techniques in repair and reconstruction. Hand Clin 31:437–449
Cheek J, Garnham B, Quan J (2006) What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res 16:423–435
Piolanti N, Poggetti A, Nucci AM et al (2018) The 50 most cited articles about wrist surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 10:7715
Lum ZC, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Meehan JP (2020) Top 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery: an update. J Orthop 19:132–137
Eberlin KR, Labow BI, Upton J, Taghinia AH (2012) High-impact articles in hand surgery. Hand 7:157–162
To P, Atkinson CT, Lee DH, Pappas ND (2013) The most cited articles in hand surgery over the past 20-plus years: a modern-day reading list. J Hand Surg Am 38:983–987
Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K, Huffman GR, Glaser D (2012) Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1796–1802
Altmetric Attention Score (2020) Altmetric. https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated. Accessed 29 Oct 2020
Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature I. How to get started the evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA 270(2093):5
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1–3
Garcia-Elias M, Lluch AL, Stanley JK (2006) Three-ligament tenodesis for the treatment of scapholunate dissociation: indications and surgical technique. J Hand Surg Am 31:125–134
Links AC, Chin SH, Waitayawinyu T, Trumble TE (2008) Scapholunate interosseous ligament reconstruction: results with a modified Brunelli technique versus four-bone weave. J Hand Surg Am 33:850–856
Fujihara Y, Fujihara N, Yamamoto M, Hirata H (2019) Citation analysis of articles about hand surgery published in orthopaedic and hand surgery journals. J Hand Surg Asian-Pacific 24:36–44
Probst P, Zaschke S, Heger P et al (2019) Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404:273–284
Kukla R (2007) Resituating the principle of equipoise: justice and access to care in non-ideal conditions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 17:171–202
Truog RD (1999) Informed consent and research design in critical care medicine. Crit Care 3:R29-33
Ahmad T, Chinoy MA, Tayyab M (2014) Using levels of evidence to compare clinical impact from research. J Evid Based Med 7:38–44
Gami AS, Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB (2004) Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. CMAJ 170:1925–1927
Funding
No funds were received in support of this study. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. KHL performed the literature search; KHL, HH, JSK, WA and SMK performed the data analysis; and KHL, HH, JSK, WA and SMK drafted and/or critically revised the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Steven Koehler is a committee member of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), a paid consultant and speaker for Integra Life Sciences, Inc, a paid consultant for Tissium, Inc., a stockholder and member of the medical advisory board for Reactiv, Inc., a member of the advisory board for Androes, LLC, and a speaker for TriMed, Inc. KHL, HH, JSK, and WA declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not sought for the present study because no patient data was collected.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levy, K.H., Huddleston, H., Kurtzman, J.S. et al. The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 995–1004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02864-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02864-3