Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative prospective study between stemmed versus an unstemmed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty in obese patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is no consensus in the literature regarding the patients with obesity who do well with TKA, or this group is at risk of a variety of complications. Implant choices between the two types of implants which either long or standard stem can improve the likelihood that a patient with obesity will achieve high scores for function and quality of life after TKA.

Methods

This prospective clinical study included 200 patients who were categorized into two groups: group (1) traditional (standard) unstemmed cemented tibial tray (n = 100 patients) and group (2) stemmed cemented tibial tray with the cementless press-fit stem (n = 100 patients).

Results

The average follow-up was (7.6 ± 1 years) (range from 6.5 up to 10 years). The average age of the stemmed group was 55.69 ± 8.45 and for the unstemmed group was 57.3 ± 7.8. The average BMI for the stemmed patients was 38.84 ± 3.89, while for the standard (unstemmed) group was 40.0 ± 3.95. Functional results showed significant improvement in both groups but more in the stemmed group (LS) as the difference and change between pre and post were more significant at long stem (P > 0.001).

Conclusion

Based on our results, there were significant improvements in both groups either stemmed or unstemmed TKA but more in the stemmed group which had higher functional outcomes compared to the unstemmed group.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, Verdier N, Argenson JN (2017) Do stemmed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty improve outcomes in patients with obesity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lifshitz F, Lifshitz JZ (2014) Globesity (2014): the root causes of the obesity epidemic in the USA and now worldwide. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 12:17–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sturm R, An R (2014) Obesity and economic environments. CA Cancer J Clin 64:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2005) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization (2015) Obesity. http://www. who.int/topics/obesity/en/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015

  6. Page AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Belatti DA, Callaghan JJ (2014) Comorbidities in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: do they influence hospital costs and length of stay? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3943–3950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nu´n˜ez M, Nu´n˜ez E, Segur JM, Macule´ F, Sanchez A, Hernandez MV, Vilalta C (2007) Health-related quality of life and costs in patients with osteoarthritis on the waiting list for total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McElroy MJ, Pivec R, Issa K, Harwin SF, Mont MA (2013) The effects of obesity and morbid obesity on outcomes in TKA. J Knee Surg 26:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker P, Muthumayandi K, Gerrand C, Kleim B, Bettinson K, Deehan D (2013) Influence of body mass index (BMI) on functional improvements at 3 years following total knee replacement: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 8:e59079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD (2015) Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI C 35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 30:2181–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim CT, Goodman SB, Huddleston JI 3rd, Harris AHS, Bhowmick S, Maloney WJ, Amanatullah DF (2017) Weight gain after primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with accelerated time to revision for aseptic loosening. J Arthroplasty 32:2167–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steere JT, Sobieraj MC, DeFrancesco CJ, Israelite CL, Nelson CL, Kamath AF (2018) Prophylactic tibial stem fixation in the obese: comparative early results in primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(3):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fehring TK, Fehring KA, Anderson LA, Otero JE, Springer BD (2017) Catastrophic varus collapse of the tibia in obese total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1625–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Hyldahl HC, Meding JB, Redelman R (2008) Implant migration and failure in total knee arthroplasty are related to body mass index and tibial component size. J Arthroplasty 23(6 Suppl 1):104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chalmers BP, Sculco PK, Fehring KA, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2017) A novel percentage-based system for determining aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty tibial components. J Arthroplasty 32:2274–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ries C, Heinichen M, Dietrich F, Jakubowitz E, Sobau C, Heisel C (2013) Short-keeled cemented tibial components show an increased risk for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1008–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyce Louis, Prasad Anoop, Barrett Matthew, Dawson-Bowling Sebastian, Millington Steven, Hanna Sammy A, Achan Pramod (2019) The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(4):553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization (2015) Meeting report-osteoporosis. https://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf.Accessed, 30 Sept 2015

  19. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1963) The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Atlas of standard radiographs. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford UK

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ebraheim NA, Ray JR, Wandtke ME, Buchanan GS, Sanford CG, Liu J (2015) Systematic review of periprosthetic tibia fracture after total knee arthroplasties. World J Orthop 6(8):649–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Great thanks Dr. Wael Galal Lecturer in community medicine Department, Faculty of medicine Zagazig University, Egypt, Mrs/Samah Mahsoub and Ms/Habiba Elzohairy for their great help during the preparation and editing of the current paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Mansour Elzohairy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2000.

Human and animal rights

All human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients participants included in the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elzohairy, M.M., Elaidy, S.M. & Attia, M.E. A comparative prospective study between stemmed versus an unstemmed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 695–703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02816-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02816-x

Keywords

Navigation