Abstract
Background
Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip between the age of 6 and 18 months starts with closed reduction (CR). If CR is not attainable, open reduction is performed. Open reduction and pelvic osteotomy (ORPO) is usually done directly after the age of two. The aim of this study is to evaluate CR compared to ORPO with respect to early radiographic outcome in patients aged 18 to 24 months at reduction.
Methods
A single-surgeon cohort was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 24 months, no prior treatment and minimal follow-up of 2 years. Hips that were not displaced or had a nonidiopathic cause were excluded. Residual dysplasia was defined as a center edge angle (CEA) of less than 15° or CEA less than 20° with an acetabular index (AI) of more than 30°. Multiple regression was used, the outcome was follow-up CEA, and the explanatory variables were age, sex, type of surgery, international hip dysplasia grade and preoperative AI. Values of preoperative AI in the CR group and follow-up CEA were plotted.
Results
Eighty-two hips in fifty patients were included. Residual dysplasia was identified in 16 hips (20%), 12 (27%) after CR, and 4 (11%) after ORPO (p = 0.10). Recurrence and avascular necrosis rates were not statistically different. Preoperative AI and type of surgery independently affected CEA. CR patients with a preoperative AI of more the 40° had a 50% (10/20) risk of residual dysplasia.
Conclusion
CR is an important option to consider in selected patients between the age of 18 and 24 months and the selection should not be based on intraoperative assessment only, but also on preoperative measurement of AI.
Level of evidence
Level III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Terjesen T, Horn J, Gunderson RB (2014) Fifty-Year follow-up of late-detected hip dislocation: clinical and radiographic outcomes for seventy-one patients treated with traction to obtain gradual closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(4):e28. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00397
Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL (1994) Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(12):1777–1792
Thomas SR, Wedge JH, Salter RB (2007) Outcome at forty-five years after open reduction and innominate osteotomy for late-presenting developmental dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(11):2341–2350. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00857
Albinana J, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Morcuende J, Meyer MD (2004) Acetabular dysplasia after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Implications for secondary procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):876–886
Lindstrom JR, Ponseti IV, Wenger DR (1979) Acetabular development after reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(1):112–118
Huang SC, Wang JH (1997) A comparative study of nonoperative versus operative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients of walking age. J Pediatr Orthop 17(2):181–188
Narayanan U, Mulpuri K, Sankar WN, Clarke NMP, Hosalkar H, Price CT (2015) Reliability of a new radiographic classification for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 35(5):478–484
Alassaf N (2018) Predictors of femoral shortening for pediatric developmental hip dysplasia surgery: an observational study in 435 patients. Patient Saf Surg 12(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-018-0176-y
Alassaf N (2018) Single-leg spica provides adequate stability after open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(2):173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2845-1
Park K-B, Vaidya VN, Shin H, Kwak YH (2018) Prereduction traction for the prevention of avascular necrosis before closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 14:1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S166531
Alassaf N, Abuhaimed J, Almahmoud N, Binkhulaif R (2017) The added value of postoperative axial imaging in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Open Orthop J 11(1):567–576
Alassaf N (2018) Prediction of the requirement of open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Int Med Res 46(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517717357
Bolland BJ, Wahed A, Al-Hallao S, Culliford D, Clarke NMP (2010) Late reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip and the need for secondary surgery: radiologic predictors and confounding variables. J Pediatr Orthop 30(7):676–682. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181efb8c7
Sankar WN, Gornitzky AL, Clarke NMP, Herrera-Soto JA, Kelley S, Matheney T, Mulpuri K, Schaeffer EK, Upasani VV, Williams N, Price CT (2019) Closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: early-term results from a prospective, multicenter cohort. J Pediatr Orthop 39(3):111–118. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000895
Li Y, Guo Y, Li M, Zhou Q, Liu Y, Chen W, Li J, Canavese F, Xu H (2018) Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop 42(3):631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3726-5
Chen IH, Kuo KN, Lubicky JP (1994) Prognosticating factors in acetabular development following reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 14(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199401000-00002
Cherney DL, Westin GW (1989) Acetabular development in the infant’s dislocated hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:98–103
Tönnis D (1976) Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:39–47
Kitoh H, Kitakoji T, Katoh M, Ishiguro N (2006) Prediction of acetabular development after closed reduction by overhead traction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Sci 11(5):473–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1049-2
Shin CH, Yoo WJ, Park MS, Kim JH, Choi IH, Cho T (2016) Acetabular remodeling and role of osteotomy after closed reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(11):952–957. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00992
Mansour E, Eid R, Romanos E, Ghanem I (2017) The management of residual acetabular dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop B 26(4):344–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000358
Omeroğlu H, Agus H, Biçimoğlu A, Tümer Y (2012) Evaluation of experienced surgeons’ decisions regarding the need for secondary surgery in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 32(1):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31823db06b
Harris NH (1976) Acetabular growth potential in congenital dislocation of the hip and some factors upon which it may depend. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:99–106
Brougham DI, Broughton NS, Cole WG, Menelaus MB (1988) The predictability of acetabular development after closed reduction for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(5):733–736
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alassaf, N. Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between the age of 18 and 24 months. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 637–641 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02601-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02601-5