Skip to main content
Log in

Description of new “epsilon sign” and its significance in reduction in highly unstable variant of intertrochanteric fracture

  • Original Article • HIP - FRACTURES
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intertrochanteric fractures are commonly encountered in day-to-day trauma practice having various fracture patterns. Adequate reduction and appropriate fixation methodology is required for optimum results. However, failure rates are very high in unstable fractures. Here we describe a unique unstable variant of intertrochanteric fracture characterized by a long spike of proximal fragment, irreducibility of fracture with standard traction and internal rotation and soft tissue interposition. This appears as typical figure of 3 signs on right side and epsilon ε sign on left side on AP X-ray of pelvis with both hips.

Materials and methods

In retrospective review of 924 intertrochanteric fractures treated at our institution from June 2005 to January 2017, twenty patients with this typical highly unstable fracture pattern (epsilon sign/figure of 3 at fracture site) were operated at our institution, which included 18 males and two females with average age of 43.5 years (range 30–60 years). All patients required open reduction with specific maneuver and dynamic hip screw fixation.

Results

All patients had good reduction at the end of surgery, and all patients had good signs of clinico-radiological union at follow-up. None of the patients had implant loosening or screw back out.

Conclusion

The typical radiological pattern seen on X-ray will guide the surgeon to predict this unstable variant of IT fracture preoperatively and will suggest toward requirement of open reduction with specific maneuver and internal fixation with dynamic hip screw.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haijing H, Jingyi X, Baotong M (2014) Analysis of complications of intertrochanteric fracture treated with Gamma 3 intramedullary nail. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:3687–3693

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cyril J, Shishir SM, Syed N (2016) Type II intertrochanteric fractures: proximal femoral nailing (PFN) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS). Arch Bone Jt Surg 4:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33:713–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kulkarni GS, Limaye R, Kulkarni M, Kulkarni S (2006) Intertrochanteric fractures. Indian J Orthop 40:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bannister GC, Gibson AG, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH (1990) The closed reduction of trochanteric fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 72:317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffrey AG, Comron S, Todd AM, William M (2010) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop 34:719–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam P (2014) Treatment of recent trochanteric fracture in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:S75–S83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Said GZ, Farouk O, Said HGZ (2005) An irreducible variant of intertrochanteric fractures: a technique for open reduction. Int J Care Injured 36:871–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RC—orthopedic surgeon, performed all the surgeries, NM—orthopedic surgeon, done the data collection and interpretation, AJ—orthopedic surgeon, done the data collection and interpretation, RA—orthopedic surgeon, done the data collection and interpretation, MS—orthopedic surgeon, done the data collection and interpretation and AK—orthopedic surgeon, done the data collection and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhil Malewar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandak, R., Malewar, N., Jangle, A. et al. Description of new “epsilon sign” and its significance in reduction in highly unstable variant of intertrochanteric fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 1435–1439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02478-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02478-4

Keywords

Navigation