Midterm follow-up of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with upper tibiofibular joint capsulotomy

  • Hosein Ahmadzadeh ChabokEmail author
Up-to date Review and Case Report • KNEE - OSTEOTOMY


Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy is a popular surgery for correcting varus knee in symptomatic patients. One of the major drawbacks of this method is complications related to fibular osteotomy. This study describes pearl and pitfalls of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with upper tibiofibular joint capsulotomy, avoiding fibular osteotomy and proposes that it has less complications and better results. Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with upper tibiofibular joint capsulotomy was carried on 34 knees (19 patients) between September 2011 and June 2015 (thirteen males and six females). Operated men were between 19 and 38 years with mean 21 years. Operated women were between 23 years and 51 years. Considering that only one woman was 23 years old and the other four were between 45 and 51, better results and fewer complications were obtained in younger individuals with less body mass index and milder deformities. As a conclusion, when selecting patients, it is vital to stick to inclusion criteria. When in two or more factors, the patient is close to upper limits of inclusion criteria, unsatisfactory outcomes might be expected.


Closing wedge High tibial osteotomy Fibular osteotomy Varus deformity Peroneal nerve palsy 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34(2):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amendola A, Panarella L (2005) High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin 36(4):497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Preston CF, Fulkerson EW, Meislin R, Di Cesare PE (2005) Osteotomy about the knee—applications, techniques, and results. J Knee Surg 18(04):258–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee DC, Byun SJ (2012) High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 24(2):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Wrann CD, Lobenhoffer P (2007) The effects of valgus medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on articular cartilage pressure of the knee: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 23(8):852–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller BS, Downie B, McDonough EB, Wojtys EM (2009) Complications after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 25(6):639–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aydoğdu S, Cullu E, Arac N, Varolgüneş N, Sur H (2000) Prolonged peroneal nerve dysfunction after high tibial osteotomy: pre-and postoperative electrophysiological study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(5):305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brouwer GM, Tol AV, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen RMD, Reijman M et al (2007) Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 56(4):1204–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odenbring S, Egund N, Lindstrand A, Lohmander LS, WillÉn H (1992) Cartilage regeneration after proximal tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis. An arthroscopic, roentgenographic, and histologic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277:210–216Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujisawa YO, Masuhara KE, Shiomi SH (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin N Am 10(3):585–608Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:248–264Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw JA, Moulton MJ (1996) High tibial osteotomy: an operation based on a spurious mechanical concept. A theoretic treatise. Am Orthop orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ) 25(6):429–436Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pellegrini JV (1996) Dynamic situation experienced in vivo under the influence of active muscle contraction and relaxation of viable soft tissue. Am Orthop orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ) 25(10):730Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papachristou G, Plessas S, Sourlas J, Levidiotis C, Chronopoulos E, Papachristou C (2006) Deterioration of long-term results following high tibial osteotomy in patients under 60 years of age. Int Orthop 30(5):403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tunggal JA, Higgins GA, Waddell JP (2010) Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34(2):255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Curley P, Eyres K, Brezinova V, Allen M, Chan R, Barnes M (1990) Common peroneal nerve dysfunction after high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(3):405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, Boudriot U, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S et al (2011) Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12(1):46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wootton JR, Ashworth MJ, MacLaren CA (1995) Neurological complications of high tibial osteotomy—the fibular osteotomy as a causative factor: a clinical and anatomical study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77(1):31Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurosaka M, Tsumura N, Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Mizuno K (2000) A new fibular osteotomy in association with high tibial osteotomy (a comparative study with conventional mid-third fibular osteotomy). Int Orthop 24(4):227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ducat A, Sariali E, Lebel B, Mertl P, Hernigou P, Flecher X et al (2012) Posterior tibial slope changes after opening-and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(1):68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nha KW, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Lee DH (2016) Change in posterior tibial slope after open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44(11):3006–3013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matthews LS, Goldstein SA, Malvitz TA, Katz BP, Kaufer H (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:193–200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shams HospitalMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations