Advertisement

Total hip arthroplasty using stem-first technique with navigation: the potential of achievement of the optimal combined anteversion being a risk factor for anterior cup protrusion

  • Taishi OkadaEmail author
  • Shigeo Fukunishi
  • Yu Takeda
  • Tomokazu Fukui
  • Yuki Fujihara
  • Shoji Nishio
  • Shohei Okahisa
  • Yoshinobu Masumoto
  • Shinichi Yoshiya
Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

In the combined anteversion (CA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a cementless stem, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. It is hypothesized that in cases with large native femoral anteversion, cup anteversion can be decreased, and anterior cup protrusion from the anterior edge of the acetabulum could occur due to the achievement of optimal CA. In this study, the accuracy of CA in THA with the CA technique using imageless navigation and the relationship between the protrusion of the anterior edge of cup and optimum CA was retrospectively evaluated.

Methods

Ninety-seven patients (104 hips) who underwent primary THA by the CA technique using image-free navigation were enrolled in the study. The femoral stem was placed following the individual femoral anteversion so that the target cup anteversion could be determined following a mathematical formula (37 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Results The resulting CA values effectively achieved accurate CA with 39.49 ± 5.03° postoperatively. On the other hand, anterior cup protrusion was measured by computed tomography image. A cup protrusion length of more than 3 mm was indicated for 60 cases (57.7%). All included patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 as protrusion positive and Group 2 as protrusion negative. In Group 1, preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were significantly higher, while postoperative cup anteversion was significantly lower. However, the postoperative CA value indicated no significant difference between the groups.

Conclusions

The CA (stem-first) technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate CA. On the other hand, a large number of cases revealed anterior cup protrusion due to the low cup anteversion.

Keywords

Combined anteversion Stem-first THA Imageless navigation Cup protrusion 

Notes

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biedermann R, Tonin A, KrismerM Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stöckl B (2005) Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(6):762–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2007) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(3):282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishi T, Miki H (2012) Dose CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3054–3059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakashima Y, Hirata M, Akiyama M, Itokawa T, Yamamoto T, Motomura G, Ohishi M, Hamai S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22(4):815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoshimine F (2006) The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 39(7):1315–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amuwa C, Dorr LD (2008) The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion. J Arthroplasty 23(7):1068–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dora C, Houweling M, Koch P, Sierra RJ (2007) Iliopsoas impingement after total hip replacement: the results of non-operative management, tenotomy or acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1031–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson RA, Lachiewicz PF (2012) Groin pain after replacement of the hip: aetiology, evaluation and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(2):145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taher RT, Power RA (2003) Iliopsoas tendon dysfunction as a cause of pain after total hip arthroplasty relieved by surgical release. J Arthroplasty 18(3):387–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL (1948) A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30(3):745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E (1998) A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22(4):610–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cyteval C, Sarrabere MP, Cottin A, Assi C, Morcos L, Maury P, Taourel P (2003) Iliopsoas impingement on the acetabular component: radiologic and computed tomography findings of a rare hip prosthesis complication in eight cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(2):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park KK, Tsai T-Y, Dimitriou D, Kwon Y-M (2016) Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabularcomponent version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40(9):1807–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ueno T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Inoue D, Ohmori T, Tsuchiya H (2018) Risk factors and cup protrusion thresholds for symptomatic iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study. J Arthroplasty 33(10):3288–3296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ (1991) Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 6(3):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fukunishi S, Nishio S, Fujihara Y, Okahisa S, Takeda Y, Fukui T, Yoshiya S (2016) Accuracy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique. Int Orthop 40(1):9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li H, Wang Y, Oni JK, Qu X, Li T, Zeng Y, Liu F, Zhu Z (2014) The role of femoral neck anteversion in the development of osteoarthritis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 96(12):1586–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E, Salama JK, Ochi T, Tullos HS (1998) The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(4):711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lachiewicz PF, Kauk JR (2009) Anterior iliopsoas impingement and tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(6):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weber M, Woerner M, Messmer B, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2017) Navigation is equal to estimation by eye and palpation in preventing psoas impingement in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(1):196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT (2014) Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(4):753–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taishi Okada
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shigeo Fukunishi
    • 1
  • Yu Takeda
    • 1
  • Tomokazu Fukui
    • 1
  • Yuki Fujihara
    • 1
  • Shoji Nishio
    • 1
  • Shohei Okahisa
    • 1
  • Yoshinobu Masumoto
    • 1
  • Shinichi Yoshiya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHyogo College of MedicineNishinomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations