Advertisement

Fixation method for treatment of unstable distal clavicle fracture: systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Manusak Boonard
  • Sermsak Sumanont
  • Alisara Arirachakaran
  • Eakachit Sikarinkul
  • Pichet Ratanapongpean
  • Wichan Kanchanatawan
  • Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES
  • 280 Downloads

Abstract

Surgical management is recommended for unstable distal clavicle fractures. A variety of methods have been previously reported, but there is no current consensus regarding which method is most suitable. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare postoperative shoulder function and complications between different fixation methods to identify which class of fixation is best for unstable distal clavicle fractures. We searched the literature systematically using eligibility criteria of all comparative studies that compared postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular fixation (tight rope, screw or endobutton), hook plating, plate and screws, tension band wiring and transacromial pinning fixation for unstable distal clavicle fractures from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to February 10, 2018. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A network meta-analysis was applied to combine direct and indirect evidence and to estimate the relative effects of the treatment options. The probability of being the best treatment was estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). Ten comparative studies (n = 505 patients) with one RCT study (n = 42) met the inclusion criteria. Intervention included coracoclavicular fixation (n = 111 patients), hook plating (n = 300 patients), plate and screws (n = 41 patients), tension band wiring (n = 81 patients) and transacromial pinning (n = 14 patients). A network meta-analysis showed that CM scores of coracoclavicular fixation were significantly higher when compared to hook plate and tension band wiring, with pooled mean of 2.98 (95% CI 0.05–5.91) and 7.11 (95% CI 3.04–11.18). For UCLA, CC fixation and plate and screw fixation had significantly higher scores compared to hook plating fixation with a mean score 2.22 (95% CI 0.44–3.99) and 3.20 (95% CI 0.28–6.12), respectively. In terms of complications, plate and screw fixation had lower risk with RRs of 0.63 (95% CI 0.20–1.98), 0.37 (95% CI 0.19–0.72), 0.11 (95% CI 0.04–0.30) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.002–0.16) when compared to coracoclavicular fixation, hook plating, tension band wiring and transacromial pinning. The SUCRA probabilities of CC fixation were in the first rank with 96.8% for CMS, while plate and screw fixation were in the first rank with 67.7 and 93.8% for UCLA score and complications. We recommend using plate and screw and CC fixation as the first- and second-line treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures. As the quality of studies for this meta-analysis was not high, larger and higher-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these conclusions for informed clinical decision making.

Keywords

Distal clavicle fracture CMS UCLA Complications Systematic review Network meta-analysis 

Abbreviations

CC

Coracoclavicular

K-wires

Kirschner wires

AC

Acromioclavicular

CMS

Constant Murley Score

UCLA

University of California at Los Angeles

RCT

Randomized controlled trial

SD

Standard deviation

UMD

Unstandardized mean difference

RR

Relative risk

TBW

Tension band wiring

TKW

Transacromial Knowles pinning

SUCRA

Surface under the cumulative ranking curves

Notes

Acknowledgements

All authors declare no funding source or sponsor involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in writing the manuscript, and in submission of the manuscript for publication.

Authors’ contributions

MB was responsible for the conception and design, collection and assembly of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript, final approval of the article. SS was responsible for the conception and design, collection and assembly of data, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, final approval of the article. AA was responsible for the manuscript writing, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual contents and final approval of the article. ES was responsible for the manuscript writing, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual contents and final approval of the article. PR was responsible for collection and assembly of data. WK was responsible for collection and assembly of data. JK was responsible for the conception and design, collection and assembly of data, supervising analysis and interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual contents, final approval of the article and statistical expertise.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

590_2018_2187_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 60 kb)
590_2018_2187_MOESM2_ESM.doc (92 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 92 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Neer CS 2nd (1963) Fracture of the distal clavicle with detachment of the coracoclavicular ligaments in adults. J Trauma 3:99–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsuei YC, Au MK, Chu W (2010) Comparison of clinical results of surgical treatment for unstable distal clavicle fractures by transacromial pins with and without tension band wire. J Chin Med Assoc 73(12):638–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards DJ, Kavanagh TG, Flannery MC (1992) Fractures of the distal clavicle: a case for fixation. Injury 23(1):44–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neer CS 2nd (1968) Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nordqvist A, Petersson C, Redlund-Johnell I (1993) The natural course of lateral clavicle fracture. 15 (11–21) year follow-up of 110 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 64(1):87–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kona J, Bosse MJ, Staeheli JW, Rosseau RL (1990) Type II distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective review of surgical treatment. J Orthop Trauma 4(2):115–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballmer FT, Gerber C (1991) Coracoclavicular screw fixation for unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(2):291–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg JA, Bruce WJ, Sonnabend DH, Walsh WR (1997) Type 2 fractures of the distal clavicle: a new surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6(4):380–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Checchia SL, Doneux PS, Miyazaki AN, Fregoneze M, Silva LA (2008) Treatment of distal clavicle fractures using an arthroscopic technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(3):395–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pujol N, Philippeau JM, Richou J, Lespagnol F, Graveleau N, Hardy P (2008) Arthroscopic treatment of distal clavicle fractures: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(9):884–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2012) Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 40(7):1628–1634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kashii M, Inui H, Yamamoto K (2006) Surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures using the clavicular hook plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:158–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tambe AD, Motkur P, Qamar A, Drew S, Turner SM (2006) Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle treated by hook plating. Int Orthop 30(1):7–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalamaras M, Cutbush K, Robinson M (2008) A method for internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures: early observations using a new technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):60–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klein SM, Badman BL, Keating CJ, Devinney DS, Frankle MA, Mighell MA (2010) Results of surgical treatment for unstable distal clavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(7):1049–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leppilahti J, Jalovaara P (1999) Migration of Kirschner wires following fixation of the clavicle–a report of 2 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70(5):517–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson CM, Cairns DA (2004) Primary nonoperative treatment of displaced lateral fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(4):778–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shin SJ, Roh KJ, Kim JO, Sohn HS (2009) Treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures using two suture anchors and suture tension bands. Injury 40(12):1308–1312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoo JH, Chang JD, Seo YJ, Shin JH (2009) Stable fixation of distal clavicle fracture with comminuted superior cortex using oblique T-plate and cerclage wiring. Injury 40(4):455–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiang CL, Yang SW, Tsai MY, Kuen-Huang Chen C (2010) Acromion osteolysis and fracture after hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(4):e13–e15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stegeman SA, Nacak H, Huvenaars KH, Stijnen T, Krijnen P, Schipper IB (2013) Surgical treatment of Neer type-II fractures of the distal clavicle: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 84(2):184–190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flinkkilä T, Heikkilä A, Sirniö K, Pakarinen H (2015) TightRope versus clavicular hook plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(3):465–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flinkkila T, Ristiniemi J, Hyvonen P, Hamalainen M (2002) Surgical treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle: a comparative study of Kirschner wire and clavicular hook plate fixation. Acta Orthop Scand 73(1):50–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen CY, Yang SW, Lin KY, Lin KC, Tarng YW, Renn JH, Lai CH (2014) Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 9(1):42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vilela JCS, De Andrade RP, Gonçalves LBJ, Machado TLA, Filho MRCC, De Araujo ID (2015) Fractures of the distal clavicle: comparison between two surgical treatment methods. Rev Bras Ortop 50(2):136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tan HL, Zhao JK, Qian C, Shi Y, Zhou Q (2012) Clinical results of treatment using a clavicular hook plate versus a T-plate in neer type II distal clavicle fractures. Orthopedics 35(8):e1191–e1197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee YS, Lau MJ, Tseng YC, Chen WC, Kao HY, Wei JD (2009) Comparison of the efficacy of hook plate versus tension band wire in the treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. Int Orthop 33(5):1401–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catala-Lopez F, Gotzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wells GA SB, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysesGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Altman DG, Bland JM (2003) Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 326(7382):219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palmer TMPJ, Sutton AJ, Moreno SG (2008) Contour-enhanced funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J 8(2):242–254Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L (2008) Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol 61(10):991–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    White IR (2009) Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J 9(1):40–56Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    White IR (2011) Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: updates to mvmeta. Stata J 11(2):255–270Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baldwin K, Namdari S, Andersen JR, Lee B, Itamura JM, Huffman GR (2010) Luggage tag technique of anatomic fixation of displaced acromioclavicular joint separations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):259–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu K, Chang CH, Yang RS (2011) Comparing hook plates and Kirschner tension band wiring for unstable lateral clavicle fractures. Orthopedics 34(11):e718–e723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Erdle B, Izadpanah K, Jaeger M, Jensen P, Konstantinidis L, Zwingmann J, Sudkamp NP, Maier D (2017) Comparative analysis of locking plate versus hook plate osteosynthesis of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(5):651–662.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2645-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yan HW, Li L, Wang RC, Yang Y, Xie Y, Tang J, Shi ZY (2017) Clinical efficacies of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using suture anchor versus hook plate in the treatment of distal clavicle fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(8):1287–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hsu KH, Tzeng YH, Chang MC, Chiang CC (2018) Comparing the coracoclavicular loop technique with a hook plate for the treatment of distal clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(2):224–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bezer M, Aydin N, Guven O (2005) The treatment of distal clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular ligament disruption: a report of 10 cases. J Orthop Trauma 19(8):524–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang SW, Lin LC, Chang SJ, Kuo SM, Hwang LC (2011) Treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures with single coracoclavicular suture fixation. Orthopedics 34(6):e172Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Swanson KE, Swanson BL (2009) A minimally invasive surgical technique to treat distal clavicle fractures. Orthopedics 32(7):509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Anderson K (2003) Evaluation and treatment of distal clavicle fractures. Clin Sports Med 22(2):319–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Choi S, Kim SR, Kang H, Kim D, Park YG (2015) Modified tension band fixation and coracoclavicular stabilisation for unstable distal clavicle fracture. Injury 46(2):259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Haidar SG, Krishnan KM, Deshmukh SC (2006) Hook plate fixation for type II fractures of the lateral end of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(4):419–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kanchanatawan W, Wongthongsalee P (2016) Management of acute unstable distal clavicle fracture with a modified coracoclavicular stabilization technique using a bidirectional coracoclavicular loop system. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(2):139–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Group GW (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopedic DepartmentBangkok Hospital UdonUdon ThaniThailand
  2. 2.Orthopedics Department, Faculty of MedicineKhon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  3. 3.Orthopedic DepartmentLerdsin General HospitalBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Orthopedics DepartmentBangkok HospitalBangkokThailand
  5. 5.Sport and Orthopedic Center, Samitivej Hospital and Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations