Advertisement

Effects on proprioception by Kinesio taping of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament rupture

  • Lars Bischoff
  • Christian Babisch
  • Jürgen Babisch
  • Frank Layher
  • Klaus Sander
  • Georg Matziolis
  • Stefan Pietsch
  • Eric Röhner
Original Article • KNEE - SPORT
  • 472 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The use of Kinesio tape (KT) to improve proprioception is a matter of considerable debate. In comparison, the rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is a sufficiently well-investigated injury with a proven compromise of proprioception. The objective of the present study was to assess a supportive effect on proprioception after KT application, taking the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture as an example.

Materials and methods

Forty-eight patients who had suffered an ACL rupture, confirmed clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging, and who were treated conservatively or were awaiting surgery were included in this study. In all patients, a gait analysis was performed on the affected leg before and after KT application. In addition, the IKDC score, the Lysholm score, stability using the Rolimeter, and the angle reproduction test were determined.

Results

Thirty-nine men and nine women who had had an ACL rupture for at least 3 weeks were included in the study. Significant improvements were achieved on the affected knee joint for the gait analysis parameters touchdown and unrolling, cadence, stability and stance phase as well as an extension of the hip joint. The Lysholm score improved from 79.3 to 85.8 (p < 0.001) and the IKDC score from 60.2 to 71.3 points (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were achieved in the Rolimeter and angle reproduction test.

Conclusions

The use of KT has a positive effect on proprioception in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Therefore, the application may improve gait pattern as well as the subjective function of the affected knee joint.

Keywords

Kinesio tape Proprioception Anterior cruciate ligament 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We did not receive any benefits directly or indirectly from commercial parties.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim K-S, Seo H-M, Lee H-D (2002) Effect of taping method on ADL, range of motion, hand function and quality of life in post-stroke Patients for 5 weeks. Korean J Rehabil Nurs 5(1):7–17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee M-S (2007) Effects of kinesio taping on muscle strength improvement, and the blood markers of muscle fatigue and damage. The Graduate School of Yonsei University, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T (2003) Clinical therapeutic application of the Kinesio taping method, 3rd edn. Kenikai Co. Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Callaghan MJ, Selfe J (2012) Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006717.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006717.pub2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simon J, Garcia W, Docherty CL (2014) The effect of kinesio tape on force sense in people with functional ankle instability. Clin J Sport Med 24(4):289–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J (2004) The effects of kinesio taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 3(1):1–7PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K (2012) Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries. Sports Med 42(2):153–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riemann BL, Lephart SM (2002) The sensorimotor system, part II: the role of proprioception in motor control and functional joint stability. J Athl Train 37(1):80PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cabuk H, Kusku Cabuk F (2016) Mechanoreceptors of the ligaments and tendons around the knee. Clin Anat 29(6):789–795.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22743 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H (2000) The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(1):36–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anders JO, Venbrocks RA, Weinberg M (2008) Proprioceptive skills and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone graft. Int Orthop 32(5):627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0381-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho HY, Kim EH, Kim J, Yoon YW (2015) Kinesio taping improves pain, range of motion, and proprioception in older patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 94(3):192–200.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Torres R, Trindade R, Gonçalves RS (2016) The effect of kinesiology tape on knee proprioception in healthy subjects. J Bodyw Mov Ther 20(4):857–862.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Almeida Lins CA, Neto FL, de Amorim ABC, de Brito Macedo L, Brasileiro JS (2013) Kinesio Taping® does not alter neuromuscular performance of femoral quadriceps or lower limb function in healthy subjects: randomized, blind, controlled, clinical trial. Man Ther 18(1):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morris D, Jones D, Ryan H, Ryan C (2013) The clinical effects of Kinesio® Tex taping: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 29(4):259–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cimino SR, Beaudette SM, Brown SH (2018) Kinesio taping influences the mechanical behaviour of the skin of the low back: a possible pathway for functionally relevant effects. J Biomech 67:150–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tu SJ, Woledge RC, Morrissey D (2016) Does ‘Kinesio tape’alter thoracolumbar fascia movement during lumbar flexion? An observational laboratory study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 20(4):898–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Csapo R, Alegre LM (2015) Effects of Kinesio® taping on skeletal muscle strength—a meta-analysis of current evidence. J Sci Med Sport 18(4):450–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Słupik A, Dwornik M, Białoszewski D, Zych E (2007) Effect of Kinesio Taping on bioelectrical activity of vastus medialis muscle. Preliminary report. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9(6):644–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fu T-C, Wong AM, Pei Y-C, Wu KP, Chou S-W, Lin Y-C (2008) Effect of Kinesio taping on muscle strength in athletes—a pilot study. J Sci Med Sport 11(2):198–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong OM, Cheung RT, Li RC (2012) Isokinetic knee function in healthy subjects with and without Kinesio taping. Phys Ther Sport 13(4):255–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parreira PdCS, Costa LdCM, Junior LCH, Lopes AD, Costa LOP (2014) Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: a systematic review. J Physiother 60(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Bischoff
    • 1
  • Christian Babisch
    • 3
  • Jürgen Babisch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frank Layher
    • 1
  • Klaus Sander
    • 1
  • Georg Matziolis
    • 1
  • Stefan Pietsch
    • 1
  • Eric Röhner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsJena University HospitalEisenbergGermany
  2. 2.Orthopaedic DepartmentHelios-Klinikum Erfurt GmbHErfurtGermany
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation and Sports MedicineMEDICA-HospitalLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations