Tile C pelvic ring injuries are challenging to manage even in the most experienced hands. The majority of such injuries can be managed using percutaneous reduction techniques, and the posterior ring can be stabilized using percutaneous transiliac–transsacral screw fixation. However, a subgroup of patients present with inadequate bony corridors, significant sacral zone 2 comminution or significant lateral/vertical displacement of the hemipelvis through a complete sacral fracture. Percutaneous strategies in such circumstances can be dangerous. Those patients may benefit from prone positioning and open reduction of the sacral fracture with fixation through tension band plating or lumbo-pelvic fixation. Soft tissue handling is critical, and direct reduction techniques around the sacrum can be difficult due to the complex anatomy and the fragile nature of the sacrum making clamp placement and tightening a challenge. In this paper, we propose a mini-invasive technique of indirect reduction and temporary stabilization, which is soft tissue friendly and permits maintenance of reduction during definitive fixation surgical.
Tile C pelvic fracture Percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring Vertical shear pelvic fracture Lumbo-pelvic fixation Posterior pelvic external fixator Transiliac–transsacral screw fixation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declares that there is no conflict of interest
Pohlemann T, Gänsslen A, Tscherne H (1992) The problem of the sacrum fracture. clinical analysis of 377 cases. Orthopade 21:400–412 (in German)PubMedGoogle Scholar
Beckmann N, Cai C (2017) CT characteristics of traumatic sacral fx in association with pelvic ring injuries: correlation using the Young Burgess classification system. Emerg Radiol 24:255–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW et al (1990) Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 30:848–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T (1988) Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:67–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
Krappinger D, Larndorfer R, Struve P, Rosenberger R, Arora R, Blauth M (2007) Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring: a clinical and radiological follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 21:595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Sullivan MP, Scolaro JA, Milby AH, Mehta S (2015) Isolated pelvic ring injuries: functional outcomes following percutaneous, posterior fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:1025–1030CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Routt MC Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11(8):584–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ayoub MA (2012) Type C pelvic ring injuries in polytrauma patients: Can percutaneous iliosacral screws reduce morbidity and costs? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(2):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim JW, Oh CW, Oh JK, Kyung HS, Park KH, Yoon SD, Yoon SH (2016) The incidence of and factors affecting iliosacral screw loosening in pelvic ring injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(7):921–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar