Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years

  • Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries. Locking plates and anterograde medullary nails are the two most common fixation devices used when open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is indicated. Complications related to fracture and to hardware are numerous, especially shoulder stiffness. The goal of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of gleno-humeral arthroscopic arthrolysis combined with hardware removal.

Methods

A total of 58 patients (25 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 58 years (24–79) were reviewed retrospectively. Forty of them were active workers (5 heavy workers), and 18 were retired. A total of 24 fractures were reported after sport accident, 26 after domestic accident, and 8 after high energy trauma. Thirty-four patients with 3 or 4 part fractures (fracture through the anatomic neck and tuberosities), 20 patients with two part (displaced surgical neck) fracture and 4 cases of fracture of the tuberosities were operated. We combined a gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy and a removal of the hardware using the previous incision for the plate or by arthroscopy for the nail.

Results

The average follow-up was 23 months (range 6–60). Pain in Constant Murley score (CS) increased from 7.3 ± 3.8 points preoperatively to 13 ± 2.76 points post-operatively (p < 0.05). CS increased from 36.8 ± 12.25 points to 68.45 ± 15.24 points. Subjective shoulder value (SSV) score increased from 45.8 ± 16.6 to 78.23 ± 14.74. A gain in all active range of motion was reported (forward flexion: 37.6°, abduction: 39.5°, external rotation: 24.3°, internal rotation: from L5-S1 to T12-L1).

Conclusions

Gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy combined with hardware removal after proximal humerus ORIF in one step is safe and beneficial for post-traumatic stiffness of the shoulder. It provides significant pain relief and increase of range of motion and allows to treat associated articular pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirchoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchoff S, Sprecher CM, Ockert B, Fischer F, Leidel BA, Biberthaler P (2008) Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:138. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT (2008) Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(2):233–240. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jo MJ, Gardner MJ (2012) Proximal humerus fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5(3):192–198. doi:10.1007/s12178-012-9130-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22(3):159–164. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aksu N, Gögüs A, Kara AN, Isiklar ZU (2010) Complications encountered in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate fixation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(2):89–96. doi:10.3944/AOTT.2010.2313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin J (1998) Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation. J Trauma 44(5):859–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM (2007) Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(7):922–926. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0229-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dines JS, Hettrich CM, Kelly BT, Savoie FH 3rd, Lorich DG (2010) Arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3):409–411. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0991-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katthagen JC, Jensen G, Hennecke D, Lill H, Voigt C (2012) Arthroscopic implant removal after fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Technique and initial results in comparison to open implant removal. Unfallchirurg 115(1):47–54. doi:10.1007/s00113-011-1953-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Voigt C, Geisler A, Lill H (2010) Arthroscopic locking plate removal after proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 130(3):391–395. doi:10.1007/s00402-009-0882-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katthagen JC, Hennecke D, Jensen G, Ellwein A, Voigt C, Lill H (2014) Arthroscopy after locked plating of proximal humerus fractures: implant removal, capsular release, and intra-articular findings. Arthroscopy 30(9):1061–1067. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maqdes A, Levy B, Klouche S, Hardy P (2014) The feasibility of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):456–461. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2437-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM (2007) Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(7):922–926. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0229-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schai PA, Hintermann B, Koris MJ (1999) Preoperative arthroscopic assessment of fractures about the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15(8):827–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ph. Valenti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maroun, C., Aliani, D., Hass, A. et al. Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 317–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1938-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1938-4

Keywords

Navigation