The “challenging” fractures of the odontoid process: a review of the classification schemes
- 309 Downloads
Fractures of the odontoid process seem to have an unclear and not well-understood behavior. This is well demonstrated in the literature as there is a disagreement in many fields, including the patterns of fractures, the percentage of pseudarthrosis or the appropriate treatment that is required. This situation makes the fracture itself a “challenging” one. Indeed, despite the existence of extensive literature, there are still many unresolved problems concerning these fractures. We recognize six main classification schemes of the odontoid process fractures which clearly demonstrate the presence of differences but, also, the disadvantages that these classifications are related to. The most important factors that render these fractures “enigmatic” are the anatomy of the odontoid, the diversity of fractures encountered, the radiological evaluation, the stability and the inability to incorporate the whole spectrum of fractures in one classification. The progress made the last decades in the field of the radiology and their follow-up permitted to better analyze these lesions and to extract useful conclusions.
KeywordsOdontoid process Dens Fractures Classifications
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this publication.
- 3.Gadaifis N (2014) Study of the periosteum and its vascularity as a possible factor for the incidence of pseudarthrosis in different types of fracture of the odontoid process of the axis vertebra. Dissertation. Medical School, University of Athens (in Greek) Google Scholar
- 4.Roy-Camille R, Lepresie PH, Mazel C (1986) Les fractures del’ odontoid. In: Roy-Camille (ed) Rachis cervical supérieur Masson Cie Paris. Masson, Paris, pp 99–118Google Scholar
- 8.Wang XP, Deng ZC, Liang ZI, Tu YM (2008) Response to reply to the letter to the editor concerning “Gebauer et al subdentale sychondrosie and anatomy of the axis in the aging: a histomorphometric study on 30 autopsy cases”. Eur Spine J 15:292–298, the base of the dens axis. Where is it located? Eur Spine J 17:1771–1774Google Scholar
- 14.De Mourgues G, Fischer LP, Bejui J, Carret JP, Gonon GP, Subasi H, Amoa J, Herzberg G, Massardier J (1981) Fractures of the odontoid process. Rev Chir Orthop Repara Appar Mot 67:783–790 (in French) Google Scholar
- 15.Roy-Camille R, De La Caffiniere JH, Saillant G (1973) Traumatisme du rachis cervical supérieur C1–C2. Masson, Paris, pp 51–55Google Scholar
- 25.Adam D, Cergan R, Iftimie D, Moisescu C (2016) Odontoid fracture that is not listed in the existing classifications A new subtype of odontoid fracture: case report. Rom Neurosurg XXX(1):57–64Google Scholar
- 26.Koller H, Kammermeier V et al (2006) Spinal stenosis C1–C2 following redo surgery for failed odontoid screw fixation-scrutinizing the odontoid fracture classification. Internet J Spine Surg 3:1–11Google Scholar
- 27.Marra MA (2013) Study of dens fracture in the elderly and the role of osteoporosis with a finite element model. Master of Science Thesis in Medical Engineering. Stockholm, 2013Google Scholar
- 29.Falavigna A (2016) Management of type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians (editorial). J Neurosurg Spine 19:1–2Google Scholar