Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series

  • Amarjit Anand
  • Ran Wei
  • Akash Patel
  • Vikas Vedi
  • Garth Allardice
  • Bobby Singh AnandEmail author
Original Article • ANKLE - FRACTURES



No general consensus has yet been established for the gold standard treatment of ankle syndesmotic complex injuries. Recent literature has documented the success of ankle tightrope fixation for heterogeneous ankle fracture patterns, resulting in syndesmotic complex injuries. We present a multicentre case series assessing the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes of patients with Weber C ankle fractures treated with the Arthrex TightRope® fixation system.


We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with Weber C ankle fractures who were treated with the Arthrex TightRope® fixation system at four centres over a 3-year period. All patients were followed up for a mean of 14 months (range 12–26). Outcomes measures were assessed subjectively using functional scores (AOFAS and Olerud and Molander) and objectively using radiological measurements, complication rates and revision surgery rates.


Thirty-six patients met our eligibility criteria. The mean age at operation was 31 years (range 18–65). There were 20 males and 16 females. No patients were lost to follow-up. The ankle tightrope maintained satisfactory reduction in the ankle mortise in 97% of cases. Of these 35 successfully treated cases, no evidence of re-displacement on follow-up radiographs of the syndesmotic complex was observed at an average of 10.8 months (range 6–12). Post-operative mean medial clear space was 3.1 mm, and mean tibio-fibular overlap was 10.1 mm. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 88.8 (range 67–98) at a mean follow-up of 14 months (range 12–26). The overall complication rate was 6% (one failure requiring revision surgery and one medial sided skin irritation requiring removal of suture button). No infections or wound complications occurred.


Tightrope fixation is a safe alternative to screw fixation for syndesmotic complex injuries in Weber C ankle fractures. We have shown that it has low complication rates and a high patient satisfaction.


Ankle Fractures Tightrope Weber C Syndesmosis Syndesmotic complex Syndesmosis repair Syndesmosis reconstruction Syndesmosis reduction Diastasis Suture button 



This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author’s contribution

Mr. A. Anand contributed to data collection/study write-up; Mr. R. Wei contributed to study write-up; Mr. A. Patel contributed to data collection; Mr. V. Vedi contributed to data analysis; Mr. G. Allardice contributed to data collection/study supervisor; and Mr. B.S. Anand contributed to data collection/study supervisor.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was passed through hospital research and development boards and did not require formal ethical approval.


  1. 1.
    Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—An increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lalli TAJ, Matthews LJ, Hanselman AE, Hubbard DF, Bramer MA, Santrock RD (2015) Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removal. The Foot 25(3):131–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58(3):356–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang C, Ma X, Wang X, Huang J, Zhang C, Chen L (2013) Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Orthop 37(9):1755–1763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Teszer C, MacLeod MD (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):2–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):788–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Vlijmen N, Denk K, Van Kampen A, Jaarsma RL (2015) Long-term results after ankle syndesmosis injuries. Orthopaedics 38(11):1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hakkalamani S, Prasanna VK, Meda K (2007) Syndysmotic screw removal in Weber ‘C’ ankle fractures. Inj Extra 38(1):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2008) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 29:773–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arthrex TightRope® and Fracture Fixation. Accessed 31 May 2016
  11. 11.
    Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: a prospective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation versus TightRope® fiber wire fixation—medium term results. SA Orthop J 8:32–37Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T, Lepojärvi S, Nortunen S, Ohtonen P, Katisko J, Pakarinen H (2015) A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury 46(6):1119–1126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Den Daas A, van Zuuren WJ, Pelet S, van Noort A, van den Bekerom MPJ (2012) Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 7(3):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olerud C, Molander H (1984) A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103(3):190–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nåsell H, Ottosson C, Törnqvist H, Lindé J, Ponzer S (2011) The impact of smoking on complications after operatively treated ankle fractures—a follow-up study of 906 patients. J Orthop Trauma 25(12):748–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32:250–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B (2011) An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:762–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rigby RB, Cottom JM (2013) Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(5):563–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C (2012) Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int 33(09):717–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation—accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forsythe K, Freedman KB, Stover MD, Patwardhan AG (2008) Comparison of a novel FiberWire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int 29(1):49–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2012) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Inj J Care Inj 43(6):838–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willmott HJS, Singh B, David LA (2009) Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Inj J Care Inj 40(11):1204–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seyhan M, Donmez F, Mahirogullari M, Cakmak S, Mutlu S, Guler O (2015) Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures. Injury 46(2):19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36(6):1199–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S (2015) A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma 29(5):216–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Westermann RW, Rungprai C, Goetz JE, Femino J, Amendola A, Phisitkul P (2014) The effect of suture-button fixation on simulated syndesmotic malreduction: a cadaveric study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(20):1732–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arthrex Knotless TightRope® Syndesmosis. Accessed 31 May 2016

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amarjit Anand
    • 1
  • Ran Wei
    • 2
  • Akash Patel
    • 1
  • Vikas Vedi
    • 3
  • Garth Allardice
    • 4
  • Bobby Singh Anand
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Imperial College London HospitalsLondonUK
  2. 2.Croydon University HospitalSurreyUK
  3. 3.Hillingdon and Mount Vernon HospitalLondonUK
  4. 4.Northwick Park HospitalHarrow, MiddlesexUK
  5. 5.The Elective Orthopaedic CentreEpsomUK

Personalised recommendations