Autograft versus allograft reconstruction of acute tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study of complications and outcome

  • Abolfazl Bagherifard
  • Hassan Ghandhari
  • Mahmoud Jabalameli
  • Mohammad Rahbar
  • Hosseinali Hadi
  • Mehdi MoayedfarEmail author
  • Mohammadreza Minatour Sajadi
  • Alireza Karimpour
Original Article • KNEE - FRACTURES



There is no consensus regarding the use of filling agent in the re-elevation of depressed tibial plateau fracture (TPF). Although autograft is considered as the gold standard approach of such reconstructions, its limitation has led to a recent attraction toward allograft substitution. In this study, we compare the complications and outcome of autograft and allograft in TPF reconstruction, in order to address the existing controversy.

Materials and methods

A total of 81 patients with acute TPF were included in this study. Allograft and autograft were applied in 58 and 23 cases, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 40.26 years, and the mean follow-up period of patients was 19.1 months. Clinical and radiological assessment of the outcome was conducted, employing the modified Rasmussen clinical criteria.


A total of three infections were observed in our patients, from which two infections occurred in allograft received patients. Articular surface collapse was seen in two cases, including one allograft and one autograft receiving patient. The mean clinical score was 18.65 and 18.55 in autograft and allograft received patients, respectively (p = 0.09). The mean radiological score was 15.65 and 15.68 in autograft and allograft received patients (p = 0.3).


With respect to the comparable complication rate, clinical and radiological outcome of allogenic versus autologous reconstruction of TPF, freeze-dried allograft could be recommended as an appropriate substitute of autograft in this treatment. Nevertheless, the longer follow-up period of the patients could further extend our understanding of the clinical outcome of each component.


Tibial plateau fractures Allograft Autograft Reconstruction 



This study was funded by Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Abolfazl Bagherifard, Hassan Ghandhari, Mahmoud Jabalameli, Mohammad Rahbar, Hosseinali Hadi, Mehdi Moayedfar, Mohammadreza Minatour Sajadi and Alireza Karimpour declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Tscherne H, Lobenhoffer P (1993) Tibial plateau fractures: management and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:87–100Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henry P, Wasserstein D, Paterson M, Kreder H, Jenkinson R (2015) Risk factors for reoperation and mortality after the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures in Ontario, 1996–2009. J Orthop Trauma 29(4):182–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basques BA, Webb ML, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Grauer JN (2015) Adverse events, length of stay, and readmission after surgery for tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29(3):e121–e126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goff T, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2013) Use of bone graft substitutes in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Injury 44:S86–S94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veitch SW, Stroud RM, Toms AD (2010) Compaction bone grafting in tibial plateau fracture fixation. J Trauma 68(4):980–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng W, Fu L, Liu J, Li D, Qi X (2013) The use of deep frozen and irradiated bone allografts in the reconstruction of tibial plateau fractures. Cell Tissue Bank 14(3):375–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keating J, McQueen M (2001) Substitutes for autologous bone graft in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83(1):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lasanianos N, Mouzopoulos G, Garnavos C (2008) The use of freeze-dried cancelous allograft in the management of impacted tibial plateau fractures. Injury 39(10):1106–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ong J, Kennedy M, Mitra A, Harty J (2012) Fixation of tibial plateau fractures with synthetic bone graft versus natural bone graft: a comparison study. Ir J Med Sci 181(2):247–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiarello E, Cadossi M, Tedesco G, Capra P, Calamelli C, Shehu A et al (2013) Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res 25(1):101–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84(3):454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim YJ, Chae SU, Yang JH, Lee JW, Wi DH, Choi DH (2010) The use of fresh frozen allogenic bone graft in the impacted tibial plateau fractures. J Korean Fract Soc 23(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sassoon AA, Torchia ME, Cross WW, Cass JR, Sems SA (2014) Fibular shaft allograft support of posterior joint depression in tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 28(7):e169–e175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schatzker J, Mcbroom R, Bruce D (1979) The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:94–104Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rasmussen PS (1973) Tibial condylar fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 55(7):1331–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsu C-J, Chang W-N, Wong C-Y (2001) Surgical treatment of tibial plateau fracture in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(1–2):67–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prasad GT, Kumar TS, Kumar RK, Murthy GK, Sundaram N (2013) Functional outcome of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures treated with dual plates. Indian J Orthop 47(2):188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, Khan Y, Laurencin CT, Rosier RN (2001) Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Jt Surg 83(2 suppl 2):S98–S103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA (1995) Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3(1):1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luo C, Fang Y, Tu C, Yang T (2016) Current treatment situation and progress on bone defect of collapsed tibial plateau fractures. China J Orthop Trauma 29(2):187–191Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sferopoulos N (2014) Autograft transfer from the ipsilateral femoral condyle in depressed tibial plateau fractures. Open Orthop J 8:310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McNamara IR, Smith TO, Shepherd KL, Clark AB, Nielsen DM, Donell S, et al (2015) Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(9)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Larsson S, Hannink G (2011) Injectable bone-graft substitutes: current products, their characteristics and indications, and new developments. Injury 42:S30–S34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lohmann H, Grass G, Rangger C, Mathiak G (2007) Economic impact of cancellous bone grafting in trauma surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(5):345–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Brien P, Broekhuyse H, Blachut P, Pierre Guy M (2012) Endstage arthritis following tibia plateau fractures: average 10-year follow-up. Can J Surg 55(2):87PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abolfazl Bagherifard
    • 1
  • Hassan Ghandhari
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Jabalameli
    • 1
  • Mohammad Rahbar
    • 1
  • Hosseinali Hadi
    • 1
  • Mehdi Moayedfar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammadreza Minatour Sajadi
    • 1
  • Alireza Karimpour
    • 1
  1. 1.Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic HospitalIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations