Skip to main content
Log in

Prevention of inaccurate targeting of proximal screws during reconstruction femoral nailing

  • Original Article • HIP - TRAUMA
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the underlying cause by simulating the forces involved in a controlled laboratory setting, and then to illustrate some intraoperative tips on how to detect this malalignment and suggest solutions prevent this intraoperative complication.

Methods

The Expert Asian Femoral Nail (A2FN) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) reconstruction nail systems were evaluated to compare the characteristics of each nailing system and their reactions to soft tissue tension at the time of proximal reconstruction screw placement. Soft tissue tension was simulated by placing a fulcrum under the distal drill sleeve and exerting a load on the targeting device via the addition of weights. The occurrence and degree of guide malalignment were determined while gradually increasing the weight.

Results

When soft tissue tension was simulated on the drill/guide sleeve of the A2FN, the drill sleeve deviated from the proximal screw hole proportionally to the weight applied and the K-wire guide passed outside of the nail at a weight of 7 kg. However, the drill sleeve of the PFNA was aligned exactly to the center of nail axis and the K-wire passed cleanly through the proximal locking hole regardless of weight applied.

Conclusions

Inaccurate guidance of the screw-targeting device can be caused by soft tissue tension. Thus, the authors recommend that careful attention be placed on minimizing soft tissue tension during proximal screw placement while using the targeting device of the A2FN system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menezes DF, Gamulin A, Noesberger B (2005) Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan LA (2005) Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2217–2226. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):372–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Inglis MB, Jaarsma R (2008) Intramedullary hip screw fixation of reverse oblique and transverse trochanteric femur fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 18(5):323–326. doi:10.1007/s00590-008-0309-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muñoz-Mahamud E, García-Oltra E, Fernández-Valencia JA, Zumbado JA, Ríos J, Suso S, Bori G (2011) Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a comparative study of the long proximal femoral nail and the long trochanteric fixation nail. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21(7):511–516. doi:10.1007/s00590-010-0741-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Imerci A, Canbek U, Karatosun V, Karapinar L, Yesil M (2015) Nailing or plating for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(5):889–894. doi:10.1007/s00590-015-1629-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF (2009) Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop 33(5):1441–1444. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0776-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(7):1058–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jonsson A (2013) Critical factors in cut-out complication after gamma nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):1. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG (1990) Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(1):26–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25(5):298–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P, Abbood E, Born C (2015) Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(4):665–670. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1557-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frei HC, Hotz T, Cadosch D, Rudin M, Kach K (2012) Central head perforation, or “cut through,” caused by the helical blade of the proximal femoral nail antirotation. J Orthop Trauma 26(8):e102–e107. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822c53c1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson SJ, Fountain JR, Torella F, Pennie BH (2011) Intrapelvic migration of a lag screw from a cephalomedullary femoral nail: a case report. Injury 42(11):1384–1386. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park J, Yang KH (2010) Correction of malalignment in proximal femoral nailing—reduction technique of displaced proximal fragment. Injury 41(6):634–638. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tornetta P 3rd, Ritz G, Kantor A (1995) Femoral torsion after interlocked nailing of unstable femoral fractures. J Trauma 38(2):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK (1984) Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(4):529–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin L, Zhang L, Hou Z, Chen W, Wang P, Zhang Y (2014) Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(7):1317–1320. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1430-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JJ, Kim JW (2009) Subtrochanteric fracture: intramedullary nailing. J Korean Fract Soc 22(2):114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomas J, Teixidor J, Batalla L, Pacha D, Cortina J (2012) Subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with cerclage wire and long intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826fc03f

    Google Scholar 

  21. Afsari A, Liporace F, Lindvall E, Infante A Jr, Sagi HC, Haidukewych GJ (2010) Clamp-assisted reduction of high subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(Suppl 1 Pt 2):217–225. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyril Mauffrey.

Ethics declarations

This experimental study does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. In case illustration, informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.W., Cuellar, D.O., Hao, J. et al. Prevention of inaccurate targeting of proximal screws during reconstruction femoral nailing. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 391–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1769-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1769-8

Keywords

Navigation