Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective multicentre study of the clinical and functional outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair with suture anchors

  • Original Article • KNEE - TRAUMA
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Quadriceps tendon avulsions are typically treated by reattaching the tendon through bone tunnels, with or without tendon or hardware augmentation. The operated knee joint can be moved right away; however, tendon grafting or tension banding will be required to protect the repair, and the hardware must be removed later on. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes when suture anchors are used to reattached torn quadriceps tendon, and also to assess tendon healing using MRI.

Materials and methods

Thirteen consecutive patients with avulsed quadriceps tendons were operated and then followed prospectively. The surgical technique consisted of tendon reattachment using at least three anchors, in addition to intratendinous weaving of the sutures. Weight bearing was allowed while using a splint. Rehabilitation was initiated immediately after surgery according to a set protocol.

Results

Eleven patients were followed for a mean of 14.7 months. Two retears occurred in patients who did not wear the splint. Eighty-two per cent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. The mean knee flexion was 124.5°. All patients were able to return to their pre-injury activity levels. The mean time for clinical and functional recovery was 3 months. MRI performed 6 months after the surgical repair revealed good tendon healing.

Discussion

This was the first prospective study performed on quadriceps avulsion patients undergoing suture anchor repair. Prior clinical case reports have shown that this method leads to predictable clinical and functional results. Our results were comparable to those in published cases.

Conclusion

The procedure is simpler when only suture anchors are used. Tendon healing was observed on MRI in all cases. This simple, reproducible technique is free of the drawbacks associated with the typical repair augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clayton RAE, Court-Brown CM (2008) The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury 39(12):1338–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Konrath GA, Chen D, Lock T (1998) Outcomes following repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy M, Goldstein J, Rosner M (1987) A method of repair for quadriceps tendon or patellar ligament ruptures without cast immobilization: preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218:297–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Baere T, Geulette B, Manche E (2002) Functional results after surgical repair of quadriceps tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Belg 68(2):146–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Langenhan R, Baumann M, Ricart P (2012) Postoperative functional rehabilitation after repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures: a comparison of two different protocols. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2275–2278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maniscalco P, Bertone C, Bonci E (1998) Titanium anchors for the repair of distal Achilles tendon ruptures: preliminary report of a new surgical technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(2):96–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maniscalco P, Bertone C, Rivera F (2000) A new method of repair for quadriceps tendon ruptures: a case report. Panminerva Med 42(3):223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards DP, Barber A (2002) Repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors. Arthroscopy 18(5):556–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerin C, Hopgood P, Banks AJ (2006) Delayed repair of quadriceps using the Mitek anchor system: a case report and review of the literature. Knee 13:161–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bushnell BD, Whitener GB, Rubright JH (2007) The use of suture anchors to repair the ruptured quadriceps tendon. J Orthop Trauma 21(6):407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Howe TE, Dawson LJ, Syme G, Duncan L, Reid J (2012) Evaluation of outcome measures for use in clinical practice for adults with musculoskeletal conditions of the knee: a systematic review. Man Ther 17(2):100–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA (1989) A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:238–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cincinnati Score—Orthopaedic Scores [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 17]. http://www.orthopaedicscore.com/scorepages/cincinnati.html

  15. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW, Akmal M, Goldberg A, Williams AM, Skinner JA, Pringle J (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85(2):223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Noyes FR, McGinniss GH, Mooar LA (1984) Functional disability in the anterior cruciate insufficient knee syndrome: review of knee rating systems and projected risk factors in determining treatment. Sports Med 1(4):278–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Agel J, LaPrade RF (2009) Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: a prospective study. Am J Sport Med 37(11):2151–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saragaglia D (2012) Les ruptures récentes et anciennes de l’appareil extenseur du genou de l’adulte (hors prothèses). In: Conférence Enseign

  19. Vidil A, Ouaknine M, Anract P (2004) Ruptures traumatiques du tendon quadricipital: a propos de 47 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 90:40–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rougraff BT, Reeck CC, Essenmacher J (1996) Complete quadriceps tendon ruptures. Orthopedics 19(6):509–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vainionpää S (1985) Rupture of the quadriceps tendon. Acta Orthop Scand 56:433–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Siwek CW, Rao JP (1981) Ruptures of the extensor mechanism of the knee joint. J Bone Jt Surg Am 63:932–937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilan DI, Tejwani N, Keschner M (2003) Quadriceps tendon rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11(3):192–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. He L, Wang T, Wang M, Rong G (2002) Patella ligament and femoral quadriceps tendon rupture. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 40(12):918–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee D, Stinner D, Mir H (2013) Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures. J Knee Surg 26(5):301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wenzl ME, Kirchner R, Seide K (2004) Quadriceps tendon ruptures—is there a complete functional restitution? Injury 35:922–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sommelet J, Fery G, Grosdidier G (1979) Des ruptures de l’appareil extenseur du genou: a propos de 45 cas. Int Orthop 3:27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Duthon VB, Fritschy D (2011) Ruptures de l’appareil extenseur du genou. Rev Méd Suisse 7:1544–1548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lerais JM, Krause D, Kastler B, Tavernier C (2009) Pathologie péri-articulaire du genou. Pathologie articulaire et péri articulaire des membres Clinique, imagerie diagnostique et thérapeutique. Masson, pp 425–429

  30. Ciriello V, Gudipati S, Tosounidis T (2012) Clinical outcomes after repair of quadriceps tendon rupture: a systematic review. Injury 43:1931–1938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Spieza F (2012) Light microscopic histology of quadriceps tendon ruptures. Int Orthop 36:2367–2371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Delafenêtre MI, Massy N, Thuillez C, Noblet C (2008) Tendinous disorders attributed to statins: a study on ninety-six spontaneous reports in the period 1990–2005 and review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 59(3):367–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ho HM, Lee WKE (2003) Traumatic bilateral concurrent patellar tendon rupture: an alternative fixation method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:105–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Capiola D, Re L (2007) Repair of patellar tendon rupture with suture anchors. Arthroscopy 23(8):906.e1–906.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boudissa M, Roudet A, Rubens-Duval B (2014) Ruptures aiguës du tendon quadrcipital: une série de 50 genoux à plus de 6 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 100:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Click JN (1997) Internal fixation strength of suture anchors—update 1997. Arthroscopy 13(3):355–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Coons DA (2006) Sutures and suture anchors—update 2006. Arthroscopy 22(10):1063.e1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bisbinas I, Magnissalis E, Gigis I (2013) Rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical ex vivo ovine study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227(5):560–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J (2004) Anchor design an bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am J Sport Med 32(6):1466–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Hapa O (2011) Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update. Arthroscopy 27(7):895–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rehby L, Lepage D, Sarlieve P (2007) Imagerie du tendon du biceps brachial réinséré par ancre: la fixation est-elle viable? Bioingénierie et reconstruction osseuse. Sauramps Medical, pp 167–174

  42. Gallinet D, Dietsch E, Barbier-Brion B (2011) Suture anchor reinsertion of distal biceps rupture: clinical results and radiological assessment of tendon healing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:252–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service d’Orthopédie, de Traumatologie, de Chirurgie Plastique, Reconstructrice et Assistance Main, CHI Vesoul - CHRU Besançon & CIC IT, 808 Bd Fleming, 25033, Besançon, France

    F. Mille, A. Adam, S. Aubry, G. Leclerc, X. Ghislandi, P. Sergent & P. Garbuio

  2. EA 4268 Innovation, Imagerie, Ingénierie et Intervention en santé «I4S», IFR 133 INSERM, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon, France

    F. Mille, A. Adam, S. Aubry, G. Leclerc, X. Ghislandi, P. Sergent & P. Garbuio

Authors
  1. F. Mille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Aubry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Leclerc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. X. Ghislandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Sergent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. Garbuio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mille.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical statement

Ethical standards declaration EJOST fully adopts and supports ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national with respect to each author) and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Authors indicate that all their experiments on human subjects published in this article are in accordance with these standards. In case of any doubt, the authors agree to explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors will indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed. Further, EJOST fully adopts and supports the standards of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Authors agree to handle the statement of informed consent as indicated in the instructions to authors with regard to privacy and confidentiality of patients mentioned in the text. When informed consent has been obtained, it will be indicated in the published article.

Statement of informed consent

Patients have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without informed consent. Identifying information, including patients’ names, initials or hospital numbers, should not be published in written descriptions, photographs and pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that a patient who is identifiable be shown the manuscript to be published. Authors should identify individuals who provide writing assistance and disclose the funding source for this assistance. Identifying details should be omitted if they are not essential. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve, however, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic pedigrees, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning and editors should so note.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mille, F., Adam, A., Aubry, S. et al. Prospective multicentre study of the clinical and functional outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair with suture anchors. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 85–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1710-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1710-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation