Advertisement

Flow cytometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying total hip arthroplasty loosening and differentiating between septic and aseptic cases

  • Maria Ovrenovits
  • Emilios E. Pakos
  • Georgios Vartholomatos
  • Nikolaos K. PaschosEmail author
  • Theodoros A. Xenakis
  • Grigorios I. Mitsionis
Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • 440 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Implant loosening represents one of the major factors of total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure. The purpose of this study was to identify specific markers indicative of septic and aseptic loosening in patients that underwent THA.

Methods

Flow cytometry was performed in blood samples of 20 patients with loosening (10 septic/10 aseptic). Additional ten healthy individuals served as a control group. The expression of surface receptors and cytoplasmic molecules in patients that underwent THA was quantified. CD62L, CD18, CD11a, CD11b and CD11c expressions were evaluated and correlated with the presence of loosening. Also, a comparison between septic and aseptic THA loosening characteristics was performed.

Results

The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for CD18 was significantly decreased on all leukocytes subsets in both septic and aseptic loosening compared to control group (p < 0.005 in all occasions). Patients with aseptic loosening showed increased MFI for CD11b in granulocytes and for CD11c in monocytes and granulocytes compared to the control and aseptic group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.005, respectively). In patients with septic loosening, an increase in MFI for CD11c was observed in monocytes only compared to control group (p = 0.03). The comparison between aseptic and septic loosening showed significantly lower CD18 MFI value in granulocytes for aseptic loosening (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

CD11 and CD18 MFI values appear to be indicative of loosening in THAs. Flow cytometry markers can be used to identify THA loosening, as well as to differentiate between septic and aseptic cases.

Keywords

Flow cytometry Total hip arthroplasty Loosening Septic Aseptic Surface receptor marker 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Holt G, Murnaghan C, Reilly J, Meek RM (2007) The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:240–252. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31804b4147 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(2):171–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Toni A (1991) Cellular events in the mechanisms of prosthesis loosening. Clin Mater 7(1):51–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bi Y, Van De Motter RR, Ragab AA, Goldberg VM, Anderson JM, Greenfield EM (2001) Titanium particles stimulate bone resorption by inducing differentiation of murine osteoclasts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(4):501–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Stafford T, Glant T, Jacobs JJ (2005) Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23(2):384–391. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Berkhof J, Hoekstra OS, Teule GJ, Heyligers IC (2005) Accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(6):781–785. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15625 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roder C, Eggli S, Aebi M, Busato A (2003) The validity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of loosening of components in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(1):37–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR (1998) Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 36(10):2932–2939PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin RY, Astiz ME, Saxon JC, Rackow EC (1993) Altered leukocyte immunophenotypes in septic shock. Studies of HLA-DR, CD11b, CD14, and IL-2R expression. Chest 104(3):847–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez-Amaro R, Sanchez-Madrid F (1999) Cell adhesion molecules: selectins and integrins. Crit Rev Immunol 19(5–6):389–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bilsland CA, Diamond MS, Springer TA (1994) The leukocyte integrin p150, 95 (CD11c/CD18) as a receptor for iC3b. Activation by a heterologous beta subunit and localization of a ligand recognition site to the I domain. J Immunol 152(9):4582–4589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stacker SA, Springer TA (1991) Leukocyte integrin P150, 95 (CD11c/CD18) functions as an adhesion molecule binding to a counter-receptor on stimulated endothelium. J Immunol 146(2):648–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georgakopoulos T, Moss ST, Kanagasundaram V (2008) Integrin CD11c contributes to monocyte adhesion with CD11b in a differential manner and requires Src family kinase activity. Mol Immunol 45(13):3671–3681. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.04.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prieto J, Eklund A, Patarroyo M (1994) Regulated expression of integrins and other adhesion molecules during differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. Cell Immunol 156(1):191–211. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1994.1164 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moazzam F, DeLano FA, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schonbein GW (1997) The leukocyte response to fluid stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(10):5338–5343PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fukuda S, Schmid-Schonbein GW (2003) Regulation of CD18 expression on neutrophils in response to fluid shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(23):13152–13157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2336130100 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes BJ, Hollers JC, Crockett-Torabi E, Smith CW (1992) Recruitment of CD11b/CD18 to the neutrophil surface and adherence-dependent cell locomotion. J Clin Investig 90(5):1687–1696. doi: 10.1172/JCI116041 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palecanda A, Walcheck B, Bishop DK, Jutila MA (1992) Rapid activation-independent shedding of leukocyte L-selectin induced by cross-linking of the surface antigen. Eur J Immunol 22(5):1279–1286. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220524 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crockett-Torabi E, Sulenbarger B, Smith CW, Fantone JC (1995) Activation of human neutrophils through L-selectin and Mac-1 molecules. J Immunol 154(5):2291–2302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kishimoto TK, Jutila MA, Butcher EC (1990) Identification of a human peripheral lymph node homing receptor: a rapidly down-regulated adhesion molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87(6):2244–2248PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahn J, Ingraham RH, Shirley F, Migaki GI, Kishimoto TK (1994) Membrane proximal cleavage of L-selectin: identification of the cleavage site and a 6-kD transmembrane peptide fragment of L-selectin. J Cell Biol 125(2):461–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koulouvaris P, Ly K, Ivashkiv LB, Bostrom MP, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP, Purdue PE (2008) Expression profiling reveals alternative macrophage activation and impaired osteogenesis in periprosthetic osteolysis. J Orthop Res 26(1):106–116. doi: 10.1002/jor.20486 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guenther R, Morawietz L, Friederich M, Gehrke T, Frommelt L, Schroder JH, Krenn V (2005) Expression of CD9, CD11b, CD18, CD52 and PDGFR-beta in the interface membrane of loose endoprostheses. Pathol Res Pract 201(6):435–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morawietz L, Weimann A, Schroeder JH, Kuban RJ, Ungethuem U, Kaps C, Slevogt H, Gehrke T, Krukemeyer MG, Krenn V (2008) Gene expression in endoprosthesis loosening: Chitinase activity for early diagnosis? J Orthop Res 26(3):394–403. doi: 10.1002/jor.20485 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Ovrenovits
    • 1
  • Emilios E. Pakos
    • 2
  • Georgios Vartholomatos
    • 1
  • Nikolaos K. Paschos
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Theodoros A. Xenakis
    • 2
  • Grigorios I. Mitsionis
    • 2
  1. 1.Haematology Laboratory - Unit of Molecular BiologyUniversity Hospital of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations