Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

  • General Review • LOWER LIMB - ARHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The use of barbed sutures in various surgical specialities has shown lower operative time and equivalent wound complications. Use of barbed suture in total knee arthroplasty is still at nascent stage with only few studies comparing it with the standard closure techniques. The purpose of this review was to appraise the clinical outcomes of barbed suture use in closure of total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed and EMBASE up to December 2014 for clinical trials comparing the outcomes of closure of total knee arthroplasty with barbed sutures versus standard sutures. When there was no high heterogeneity, we used a fixed effects model. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous data were measured as measured differences with 95 % CIs.

Results

Five studies were included, with sample size ranging from 178 to 416. Fixed effect analysis showed that superficial infection was higher with barbed suture (RR 1.54, 95 % CI 0.36–2.59, P = 0.94). The barbed sutures have significantly lower closure time (MI −2.74, CI −3.06, −2.42, P < 0.00001). There was no difference in terms of deep infection, wound dehiscence, arthrofibrosis and total operative time.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis showed that the use of barbed sutures was associated with increased superficial infection rate and shorter estimated closure time. More RCTs are needed to examine the efficacy and safety of the barbed sutures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trott AT (2005) Wound and lacerations: emergency care and closure, 3rd edn. Mosby, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rasouli MR, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J (2014) Risk factors for surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 17 96(18):e158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan RJ et al (2006) A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S (2010) Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ 16(340):c1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eickmann T, Quane E (2010) Total knee arthroplasty closure with barbed sutures. J Knee Surg 23(3):163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vakil JJ, O’Reilly MP, Sutter EG et al (2011) Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplast 26(5):710–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen AD (2013) New and emerging uses of barbed suture technology in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg 33(3 Suppl):90S–95S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Villa MT, White LE, Alam M, Yoo SS, Walton RL (2008) Barbed sutures: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg J 121(3):102e–108e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaminer MS, Bogart M, Choi C, Wee SA (2008) Long-term efficacy of anchored barbed sutures in the face and neck. Dermatol Surg 34(8):1041–1047

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen AD (2010) Use of absorbable running barbed suture and progressive tension technique in abdominoplasty: a novel approach. Plast Reconstr Surg J 125(3):1024–1027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens S, Politi J, Taylor BC (2011) Evaluation of primary total knee arthroplasty incision closure with the use of continuous bidirectional barbed suture. Surg Technol Int XXI:199–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L (2012) Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure. Orthopedics 35(5):e641–e646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Sun G, Erickson JA, Peters CL (2012) Perioperative closure-related complication rates and cost analysis of barbed suture for closure in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):125–129

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Barney JK, Ross HL, Pelt CE, Peters CL (2014) Barbed versus standard sutures for closure in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplast 29(9 Suppl):135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell AL, Patrick DA Jr, Liabaud B, Geller JA (2014) superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29(5):966–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shermak MA, Mallalieu J, Chang D (2010) Barbed suture impact on wound closure in body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(5):1735–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maheswari AV, Naziri Q, Wong A, Burko I, Mont MA, Rasquinha VJ (2015) Barbed sutures in total knee arthroplasty: are these safe, efficacious and cost-effective? J Knee Surg 28(2):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen AD (2010) Use of absorbable running barbed suture and progressive tension technique in abdominoplasty: a novel approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Warner JP, Gutowski KA (2009) Abdominoplasty with progressive tension closure using a barbed suture technique. Aesthet Surg J 29:221–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Helling ER et al (2007) Complications of facial suspension sutures. Aesthet Surg J 27(2):155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright RC et al (2012) Extensor mechanism repair failure with use of bidirectional barbed suture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 27(7):1413 e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ting NT, Moric MM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR (2012) Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplast 27(10):1783–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwarkopf R, Hadley S, Weatherall JM, Gross SC, Marvin SE (2012) Barbed sutures for arthroplasty closure—does it decrease the risk of glove perforation? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 70(4):250

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India

    Sanjay Meena, Pankaj Sharma & Buddhadev Chowdhury

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, ESI Hospital, Okhla, New Delhi, India

    Shreesh Gangary

Authors
  1. Sanjay Meena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shreesh Gangary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pankaj Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Buddhadev Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Meena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meena, S., Gangary, S., Sharma, P. et al. Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25, 1105–1110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1644-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1644-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation