Abstract
Intertrochanteric fracture is the most common hip fractures in elderly population. Cephalomedullary fixation, including proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and gamma nail, is commonly used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. One of difficulties encountered in operation is insertion of the guide wire to femoral head. The guide wire would always bend and flow superiorly away from femoral calcar, and the lag screw and helical blade will follow the track and get into superior part of femoral head, not into femoral calcar. Here, we are presenting a surgical technique to direct the guide wire to right track. When guide wire just passed the tack hole of the nail, the rod of nail was slightly tapped down further to allow the superior border of the tack hole to touch the guide wire. Therefore, the superior border of the tack hole can be used as presser to prevent the wire from deviating upward. Through this way, the lag screw and helical blade get a good purchase that docked at femoral calcar. After that, the rod of nail was pulled back a little to make the wire in the middle of the tack hole, which can facilitate the insertion of the PFNA blade or lag screw. Our experience demonstrated that this surgical technique reduced the intraoperative risk for patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O’Neill JP (1982) Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:148–158
Bannister GC, Gibson AG, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH (1990) The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:242–246
Simpson AH, Varty K, Dodd CA (1989) Sliding hip screws: modes of failure. Injury 20:227–231
Ekström W, Karlsson-Thur C, Larsson S, Ragnarsson B, Alberts KA (2007) Functional outcome in treatment of unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail and the Medoff sliding plate. J Orthop Trauma 21(1):18–25
Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FM, Tufanisco CB (2005) Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 19(4):229–233
Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM et al (1995) The value of the tipapex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1058–1064
Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russell TA et al (1995) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. Instr Course Lect 44:227–253
Larsson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI (1990) Trochanteric fractures: influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:130–139
Mainds CC, Newman RJ (1989) Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device. Injury 20:98–100
Hwang JH, Garg AK, Oh JK, Oh CW, Lee SJ, Myung-Rae C, Kim MK, Kim H (2012) A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head: a cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop 46(6):627–632
Kaufer H (1980) Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:53–61
Kuzyk PR, Zdero R, Shah S, Olsen M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH (2012) Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma 26(7):414–421
Conflict of interest
Every author has no conflict of interest of this manuscript and there were no grants or external sources of funding utilized for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, L., Zhang, L., Hou, Z. et al. Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1317–1320 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1430-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1430-3