Abstract
Objective
Indexes, which can optimally represent the bony alignment around the knee, are still controversial. Three common indexes, mechanical axis (MA), anatomic axis (AA), and anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), were integrated to simplify patient follow-up in the femoral supracondylar region.
Materials and methods
Eighty consecutive adult patients (40 men, 40 women; age range 19–40 years) were studied using a full-length standing scanogram. Thirteen indexes, including MA, AA, and aLDFA, were measured and integrated. The relationships among these indexes were analyzed.
Results
The MA of the lower extremity passed with an average of 6.6 mm (9.2 % of the tibial articular surface width) medial to the knee center. The supracondylar axis (SA) was an average of 2.0° more valgus than the AA in the femoral supracondyle. An average 1.1° deviation was noted in the AA, as measured by the femoral shaft axis or a line connecting the piriformis fossa to the knee center.
Conclusion
The femoral MA may be more favorable than the MA of the lower extremity in order to represent an ideal weight-bearing line. The AA and aLDFA may be measurable via the SA in the anteroposterior view of the plain knee radiograph. Thus, patient follow-up becomes much more convenient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Richards RR, Waddell JP, Sullivan TR, Ashworth MA, Rorabeck CH (1984) Infra-isthmal fractures of the femur: a review of 82 cases. J Trauma 24:735–741
Wu CC, Lee ZL (2004) One-stage lengthening using a locked nailing technique for distal femoral shaft nonunions associated with shortening. J Orthop Trauma 18:75–80
Leung KS, Shen WY, So WS, Mui LT, Grosse A (1991) Interlocking intramedullary nailing for supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:332–340
Wu CC (2007) Femoral supracondylar malunions with varus medial condyle and shortening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456:226–232
Davison BL (2003) Varus collapse of comminuted distal femur fractures after open reduction and internal fixation with a lateral condylar buttress plate. Am J Orthop 32:27–30
Collinge CA, Gardner MJ, Crist BD (2011) Pitfalls in the application of distal femur plates for fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:695–706
Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 67:551–556
Dingwall I (1994) Biomechanics of the knee. In: Barrett D (ed) Essential basic sciences for orthopedics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 94–108
Latta LL (1991) Mechanics of normal and reconstructed limbs. Curr Orthop 5:33–41
Coventry MB (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy. Orthop Rev 17:456–458
Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227
Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD (2001) The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 286:188–195
Ogata K, Yoshii I, Kawamura H, Miura H, Arizono T, Sugioka Y (1991) Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 73:927–931
Kraus VB, Vail TP, Worrell T, McDaniel G (2005) A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. Arth Rheum 52:1730–1735
Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 5:39–47
Hendersen RC, Kemp GJ (1991) Assessment of the mechanical axis in adolescent tibia vara. Orthopedics 14:313–316
Johnson LJ, Cope MR, Shahrokhi S, Tamblyn P (2008) Measuring tip-apex distance using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Injury 39:786–790
Dabov GD (2008) Miscellaneous nontraumatic disorders. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopedics. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 987–1060
Foroughi N, Smith R, Vanwanseele B (2009) The association of external knee adduction moment with biomechanical variables in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee 16:303–309
Chao EYS, Neluheni EVD, Hsu RWW, Paley D (1994) Biomechanics of malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 25:379–386
Colebatch AN, Hart DJ, Zhai G, Williams FM, Spector TD, Arden NK (2009) Effective measurement of knee alignment using AP knee radiographs. Knee 16:42–45
Harrington IL (1983) Static and dynamic loading patterns in knee joints with deformities. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 65:247–259
Block JA, Shakoor N (2010) Lower limb osteoarthritis: biomechanical alterations and implications for therapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol 22:544–550
Stuart MJ (1999) Arthroscopic management for degenerative arthritis of the knee. In: Zuckerman JD (ed) Instructional course lectures, 48th edn. AAOS, Rosemont, pp 135–141
Gold GE, Hargreaves BA, Stevens KJ, Beaulieu CF (2006) Advanced magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Orthop Clin North Am 37:331–347
McKellop HA, Sigholm G, Redfern FC, Doyle B, Sarmiento A, Luck JV (1991) The effect of simulated fracture-angulations of the tibia on cartilage pressures in the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 73:1382–1391
Gugenheim JJ, Probe RA, Brinker MR (2004) The effects of femoral shaft malrotation on lower extremity anatomy. J Orthop Trauma 18:658–664
Petersen TD, Rohr W Jr (1987) Improved assessment of lower extremity alignment using new roentgenographic techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 219:112–119
Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs: preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:65–71
Gugerheim JJ, Brinker MR (2003) Bone realignment with use of temporary external fixation for distal femoral valgus and varus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85:1229–1237
Hall-Craggs ECB (1995) Anatomy as a basis for clinical medicine. Williams and Wilkins Waverly Europe, London
Snell RS (1995) Clinical anatomy for medical student. Little, Brown and Company, Boston
Lindsay DT (1996) Functional human anatomy. Mosby, St. Louis
Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs: preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:48–64
Tetsworth KD, Paley D (1994) Accuracy of correction of complex lower-extremity deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:102–110
Hungerford DS, Hungerford MW (2005) Alignment of the normal knee; relationship to total knee replacement. In: Billemans J, Ries MD, Victor JMK (eds) Total knee arthroplasty: a guide to get better performance. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–31
Paley D (1994) Corrective osteotomies for lower limb deformities. Curr Orthop 8:237–244
Dearborn JT, Eakin CL, Skinner HB (1996) Medial compartment arthrosis of the knee. Am J Orthop 25:18–26
Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R, Iwamoto Y (2004) Anatomic analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109
Eckhoff DG (1994) Effect of limb malrotation on malalignment and osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am 25:405–414
Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465
Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 69:745–749
Vanwanseele B, Parker D, Coolican M (2009) Frontal knee alignment: three-dimensional marker positions and clinical assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:504–509
Lang JE, Scott RD, Lonner JH, Bono JV, Hunter DJ, Li L (2012) Magnitude of limb lengthening after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 27:341–346
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, CC. Integrating various common indexes of bony alignment in femoral supracondyle. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1271–1277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1373-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1373-0