Abstract
Purpose
The global incidence of spinal cord injuries varies with the developed world having improved survival and 1 year mortality in a poly-trauma setting. This improved survival has been estimated at 20 % in a recent Cochrane review of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS).The aim of this audit is to evaluate the management of patients with suspected spinal cord injury by the trauma and orthopaedic team in three centres in South Wales.
Methods
A retrospective case note review of the secondary survey was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years and above, with poly-trauma and presenting to Accident and Emergency department at the treating hospital. We used ATLS guidelines as an audit tool and reviewed the documentation of key components of the secondary assessment.
Results
Forty-nine patients were included (29 males, 20 females) with an average age of 53.7 years (19–92 years). We found that completion of all components of the secondary survey for spinal injury was poor, 29 % receiving a digital per rectal examination despite suspected spinal injury. Paralysis level was not documented in 20.4 % of patients. Medical Research Council grade was only documented in 24.5 % although was assessed in 73.5 %. The secondary survey took place after 2 h in 54.6 % of patients.
Conclusion
We found that the documentation of the performance of a secondary survey was poor. We found that most patients included in this study are not currently meeting the minimal standard suggested by the ATLS guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Driscoll P, Wardrope J (2005) ATLS: past, present and future. Emerg Med J 22:2–22
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: a systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367(9524):174757
Capoor J, Stein AB (2005) Aging with Spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehab Clin N Am 16:129–161
Cripps RA, Lee BB, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D (2011) A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal cord 49(4):493–501
Jayaraman S, Sethi D (2009) Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2):CD004173
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (2008) Advanced trauma life support for doctors, 8th edn. American College of Surgeons, Chicago
Licina P, Nowitzke AM (2005) Approach and considerations regarding the patient with spinal injury. Int J Care Inj 36:SB2–SB12
Shooman D, Rushambuza R (2009) Importance of the log roll. Emerg Med J 26(7):539–540
Price SJ, Suttner N, Aspoas AR (2003) Have ATLS and national transfer guidelines improved the quality of resuscitation and transfer of head-injured patients? A prospective survey from a regional neurosurgical unit. Injury 34(11):834–838
Mahoney BD (2009) Spinal cord injuries. In: Ab Wolfson (ed) Harwood-Nuss’ clinical practice of emergency medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 207
Wilson JR, Singh A, Craven C et al (2012) Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian Cohort study. Spinal Cord (Epub ahead of print)
Ditunno JF, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G (1994) The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal injury Association. Paraplegia 32:70–80
American Spinal injury Association (2003) Reference manual for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association, Chicago
Crozier KS, Grzani V, Ditunno JF, Herbison GJ (1991) Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:119–121
Inaba K, DuBose JJ, Barmparas G, Reddy S, Talving P, Lam L, Demetriades D (2011) Clinical examination is insufficient to rule out thoracolumbar spine injuries. J Trauma 70(1):174–179
Porter KM, Allison KP (2003) The UK emergency department practice for spinal board unloading. Is there conformity? Resuscitation 58:117–120
Sheerin F, de Frein R (2007) The occipital and sacral pressures experienced by healthy volunteers under spinal immobilisation: a trail of three surfaces. J Emerg Nurs 33(5):447–450
Stagg MJ, Lovell ME (2008) A repeat audit of spinal board usage in the emergency department. Injury 39(3):323–326
Malik MHA, Lovell ME (2003) Current Spinal board usage in emergency departments across the UK. Injury 34:327–329
Nolan JP (2005) Advanced trauma life support in the United Kingdom: time to move on?. Emerg Med J 22:3–4
McSwain N, Rotondo M, Meade P, Duchesne J (2012) A model for rural trauma care. Br J Surg 99(3):309–314
Standards of training. http://www.boa.ac.uk/LIB/LIBPUB/Documents/GMC%20-%20Syllabus%20Standards%20-%20Attachment%20F.pdf
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brooks, F., Clark, A., O’Neil, R. et al. A multi-centred audit of secondary spinal assessments in a trauma setting: are we ATLS compliant?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24 (Suppl 1), 215–219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1371-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1371-2