Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Intervention studies of clavicle fracture treatment are numerous, but only a few high quality studies prospectively compare operative and nonoperative treatment. The objective of this study was to review evidence from randomized controlled trials on operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults with focus on fracture healing, complications and functional outcome.

Data sources

An electronic search was performed of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases which revealed 559 articles. All articles published before October 18th 2012 and written in English, Danish or Swedish were eligible.

Study selection

Articles were excluded if they included children under the age of 16, did not include acute midshaft fractures, included concomitant fractures, did not meet the requirements of Level I evidence according to Centre for evidence based medicine 2009 guidelines, were systematic reviews or meta-analyses, or did not compare operative and nonoperative treatment.

Data extraction

Articles were parsed for relevance by two reviewers independently regarding title, abstract, and full text. Extraction of data was done by both reviewers in collaboration and sorted according to the aims of the study. Complications were grouped according to additional surgery required. The quality of studies was assessed by both reviewers in unison using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme 2010 checklists.

Conclusions

It seems like operative intervention leads to fewer nonunions at the cost of an increase in minor complications compared to nonoperative treatment. However, the effects of operation on functional outcome remains controversial. High quality evidence is currently sparse supporting either operative or nonoperative treatment on displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Postacchini R, Gumina S, Farsetti P, Postacchini F (2010) Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fracture. Int Orthop 34(5):731–736. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0850-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(3):476–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeray KJ (2007) Acute midshaft clavicular fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(4):239–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neer CS 2nd (1960) Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc 172:1006–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:29–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA (1997) Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4):537–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKee MD, Seiler JG, Jupiter JB (1995) The application of the limited contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: an analysis of 114 consecutive cases. Injury 26(10):661–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thyagarajan DS, Day M, Dent C, Williams R, Evans R (2009) Treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a comparative study. Int J Shoulder Surg 3(2):23–27. doi:10.4103/0973-6042.57895

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sohn HS, Shin SJ, Kim BY (2012) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using anterior-inferior plating of clavicular midshaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(2):239–244. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1410-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, Potter J (2006) Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(1):35–40. doi:10.2106/jbjs.d.02795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright RW, Brand RA, Dunn W, Spindler KP (2007) How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:23–29. doi:10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Medicine CfEB (2009) Levels of Evidence. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025

  14. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  15. Judd DB, Pallis MP, Smith E, Bottoni CR (2009) Acute operative stabilization versus nonoperative management of clavicle fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38(7):341–345

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mirzatolooei F (2011) Comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment methods in the management of comminuted fractures of the clavicle. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45(1):34–40. doi:10.3944/aott.2011.2431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS (2009) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma 23(2):106–112. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Virtanen KJ, Remes V, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Bjorkenheim JM, Paavola M (2012) Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trials. (2010) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_RCT_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf

  20. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ (2010) A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(1):157–164. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stegeman SA, de Jong M, Sier CF, Krijnen P, Duijff JW, van Thiel TP, de Rijcke PA, Soesman NM, Hagenaars T, Boekhoudt FD, de Vries MR, Roukema GR, Tanka AF, van den Bremer J, van der Meulen HG, Bronkhorst MW, van Dijkman BA, van Zutphen SW, Vos DI, Schep NW, Eversdijk MG, van Olden GD, van den Brand JG, Hillen RJ, Frolke JP, Schipper IB (2011) Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:196. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-196

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ring D (2012) Disease and Illness: Commentary on an article by Kaisa J. Virtanen, MD, et al., Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.00728

  23. McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD (2012) Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(8):675–684. doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest related to present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark

    Carl-Henrik Rehn, Martin Kirkegaard, Bjarke Viberg & Morten Schultz Larsen

Authors
  1. Carl-Henrik Rehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Kirkegaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bjarke Viberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Morten Schultz Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl-Henrik Rehn.

Additional information

Carl-Henrik Rehn and Martin Kirkegaard have contributed equally to this project and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehn, CH., Kirkegaard, M., Viberg, B. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1047–1053 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1370-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1370-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation