Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interobserver reliability of the radiographic assessment of cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of a modified quantitative Barrack Cement grading in primary THA. Previous studies demonstrated both poor intraobserver and interobserver reliability which may be due to the qualitative nature of the scale.

Methods

Interobserver reliability of the Barrack Cement Grading System in its original format and then in combination with a quantitative measurement of implant/cement lengths was evaluated on 50 immediate post-operative radiographs of primary cemented arthroplasties. Intraobserver reliability was also assessed on a sub-sample of radiographs. Three evaluators with different skill levels and specialty participated: an arthroplasty surgeon, an orthopaedic resident and a radiologist. Reliability was measured using a weighted kappa coefficient for paired comparisons among the evaluators.

Results

Interobserver reliability was poor (κ < 0.10) for all pairings of the Barrack System. The modified quantitative system achieved slight (κ < 0.20) to poor reliability. Intraobserver reliability was dependent on the skill and specialty of the evaluator with maximal values achieved for the experienced arthroplasty surgeon using the modified quantitative system (κ = 0.62).

Conclusion

Use of the modified scale may improve the reliability of ratings when used by individual experienced arthroplasty surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harvey EJ, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD (1998) Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 13(4):396–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kramhogt M, Gehrchen PM, Bodtker S et al (1996) Inter- and intraobserver study of radiographic assessment of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 11(3):272–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Last JM (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B(3):385–389

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCaskie AW, Brown AR, Thompson JR et al (1996) Radiological evaluation of the interfaces after cemented total hip arthroplasty: interobserver and intraobserver agreement. J Bone Joint Surg 78(2):191–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly AJ, Lee MB, Wong NS et al (1996) Poor reproducibility in radiographic grading of femoral cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11(5):525–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koepsell TD, Weiss NS (2003) Epidemiologic methods: studying the occurrence of disease. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare nor have they received any funding in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulaziz Al-Ahaideb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Ahaideb, A., Muir, S.W., Huckell, J. et al. Interobserver reliability of the radiographic assessment of cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23, 889–894 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1108-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1108-7

Keywords

Navigation