Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare distal tibial fractures (4–10 cm proximal to the plafond) treated by intramedullary nailing with those treated by percutaneous locked plating and to assess the clinical and radiographic results, complication rates, and the need for secondary procedures. Thirty-six patients received percutaneous locked plate treatment and 25 patients received intramedullary nail treatment. The results obtained from these two treatment methods were assessed by comparing infection rates, starting time for wight-bearing, local implant irritation, union and malunion rates and along with secondary procedures. In the percutaneous locked plate group, two deep infections, four superficial infections, two nonunions, one malunion and 10 local implant irritations were observed. In the intramedullary nail group, one nonunion, four malunions and two local implant irritations were observed. The incidence of deep and superficial infections, local implant irritations and secondary procedures in the percutaneous locked plate group was greater than those in the intramedullary nail group. The time to full weight bearing was shorter in the intramedullary nail group. There was no significant statistical difference in malunion and nonunion rates between the two groups. The need for secondary procedures was more common in group receiving the percutaneous locked plate treatment and the time to full weight bearing was shorter in the intramedullary nail group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freedman EL, Johnson EE (1995) Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 315:25–33
Im GI, Tae SK (2005) Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma 59:1219–1223
Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A (2008) Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4–11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22:307–311
Chiu FY, Lo WH, Chen CM, Chen TH, Huang CK (1996) Unstable closed tibial shaft fractures: a prospective evaluation of surgical treatment. J Trauma 40:987–991
Collinge C, Protzman R (2010) Outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for metaphyseal distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24:24–29
Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Cooper J (2006) Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia–results in 20 patients. Injury 37:877–887
Maffulli N, Toms AD, McMurtie A, Oliva F (2004) Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop 28:159–162
Hoenig M, Gao F, Kinder J, Zhang LQ, Collinge C, Merk BR (2010) Extra-articular distal tibia fractures: a mechanical evaluation of 4 different treatment methods. J Orthop Trauma 24:30–35
Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A (2007) Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 31:709–714
Schmidt AH, Finkemeier CG, Tornetta P 3rd (2003) Treatment of closed tibial fractures. Instr Course Lect 52:607–622
Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY (2007) Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury 38:255
Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Stephan C, Möhlmann U, Tscherne H (1999) The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“poller screws”) in stabilizing tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small-diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 13:550–553
Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T (1999) The use of poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:963–968
Ricci WM, O’Boyle M, Borrelli J, Bellabarba C, Sanders R (2001) Fractures of the proximal third of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nails and blocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 15:264–270
Stedtfeld HW, Mittlmeier T, Landgraf P, Ewert A (2004) The logic and clinical applications of blocking screws. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):17–25
Vécsei V, Seitz H, Greitbauer M, Heinz T (1996) Borderline indications for locked intramedullary nailing of femur and tibia. Orthopade 25:234–246
Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA (2005) Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1213–1221
Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M (2006) Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma working group. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:76–79
Borg T, Larsson S, Lindsjö U (2004) Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury 35:608–614
Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr (1997) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A42–A47
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH (2001) Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83:62–68
Finkemeier CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, Templeman DC, Varecka TF (2000) A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 14:187–193
Littenberg B, Weinstein LP, McCarren M, Mead T, Swiontkowski MF, Rudicel SA, Heck D (1998) Closed fractures of the tibial shaft. A meta-analysis of three methods of treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 80:174–183
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seyhan, M., Unay, K. & Sener, N. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23, 595–601 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1016-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1016-x