Skip to main content
Log in

Staged complete dynamisation of the Ilizarov fixator: the Chertsey experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present our results for a simple technique for staged dynamisation and removal of the Ilizarov fixator in fracture treatment. The study involved review of prospectively collected, consecutive, single surgeon case series data. All cases included were fractures treated by Ilizarov frame by the senior Consultant author between May 2005 and May 2007 in our trauma unit. Thirty-nine patients entered study, and 36 completed the follow-up period. When patients were able to weight-bear pain free with radiological evidence of healing, frames were dynamised, initially by loosening the rods across the fracture site, then by removing all rods across the fracture site and finally the frame removed under general anaesthetic. No bracing or casting was applied post-frame removal. The main outcome measure was mean frame time and development of late deformity or complication. Of 39 fractures, 36 underwent staged dynamisation. No patients required further casting, bracing or walking aids after frame removal. There were no incidences of re-fracture, non-union or late mal-union at 1-year follow-up. The method of staged dynamisation is a safe, simple and effective technique for confirming fracture union and timing of frame removal in a fracture clinic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References:

  1. Calhoun JH, Li F, Ledbetter BR et al (1992) Biomechanics of the Ilizarov fixator for fracture fixation. Clin Orthop 280:15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morshed S, Corrales L, Genant H et al (2008) Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis BJ, Roberts PJ, Moorcroft CI et al (2004) Reliability of radiographs in defining union of internally fixed fractures. Injury 35(6):557–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy JRW, de Jong EJ, Richardson JB (1994) Fracture stiffness. J.Orthop. Tech 2:177–189

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joslin CC, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Hardy JR et al (2008) Weight bearing after tibial fracture as a guide to healing. Clin Biomech 23(3):329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrens F (1989) General theory and principles of external fixation. Clin Orthop 241:1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vijayakumar V, Marks L, Bremmer-Smith A et al (2006) Load transmission through a healing tibial fracture. Clin Biomech 21(1):49–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodship AE, Kenwright J (1985) The influence of induced micro- movement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 67B:650

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kershaw CJ, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J (1993) Tibial external fixation, weight bearing, and fracture movement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (293):28–36

  10. Claes L, Laule J, Wenger K et al (2000) The influence of stiffness of the fixator on maturation of callus after segmental transport. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82-B:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozbruch SR, Ilizarov S. (2006) Limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery. CRC Press:106

  12. Sarmiento A (1970) A functional below-the-knee brace for tibial fractures: a report on its use in one hundred thirty-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:295–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cattermole HC, Fordham JN, Muckle DS et al (1996) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry as a measure of healing in fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 10:563–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Patel A et al (1991) Assessment of tibial fracture union by 35–45 degrees internal oblique radiographs. J Orthop Trauma 5(3):349–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiedeman JJ, Lippiello L, Connolly JF et al (1990) Quantitative roentgenographic densitometry for assessing fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 253:279–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aro HT, Wippermann BW, Hodgson SF et al (1989) Prediction of properties of fracture callus by measurement of mineral density using micro-bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1020–1030

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson JB, Cunningham JL, Goodship AE et al (1994) Measuring stiffness can define healing of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3):389–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wade RH, Moorcroft CI, Thomas PB (2001) Fracture stiffness as a guide to the management of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(4):533–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No funds were received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Jeyaseelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jabbar, Y., Jeyaseelan, L. & Khaleel, A. Staged complete dynamisation of the Ilizarov fixator: the Chertsey experience. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21, 521–526 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-010-0746-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-010-0746-x

Keywords

Navigation