Abstract
A review of the current literature was undertaken to assess the lengthening index (LI) and infection rates found with different techniques of lower limb lengthening. We compared three methods of lengthening: external fixators, intramedullary nails and both methods used as a combined technique. Ten papers meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The review found that by using either an ExFix with IMN or an IMN alone lengthening was achieved at twice the rate of ExFix alone. There were no infections recorded in the IMN group, 36.2% superficial and 2.5% deep in the ExFix group and 1.4% superficial and 5.5% deep in the ExFix + IMN group. When using LI and infection rates to compare techniques, the safest and most effective method of lower limb lengthening appears to be with IMN alone.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Codivilla A (1905) On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2:353–369
Lee W, Huang S (1997) Femoral lengthening: callotasis with Ilizarov external fixator alone and with intramedullary locking nail. J Formos Med Assoc 96(2):98–102
Huang S (1997) Leg lengthening by the Ilizarov technique for patients with sequelae of poliomyelitis. J Formos Med Assoc 96(4):258–265
Wang C, Huang S (1999) The Ilizarov technique for treatment of sequelae of childhood-acquired bone and joint infection. J Formos Med Assoc 98(3):175–182
Maffuli C, Lombari C, Matarazzo L, Nele U, Pagnotta G, Fixsen J (1996) A review of 240 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis for congenital, post-traumatic or post-infective lower limb length discrepancy. J Am Coll Surg 182(5):394–402
Baumgart R, Betz A, Schweiberer L (1997) A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res 343:135–143
Catagni M, Lovisetti L, Guerreschi F, Combi A, Ottaviani G (2005) Cosmetic bilateral leg lengthening. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(10):1402–1405
Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Kilicoglu O, Burc H, Cakmak M (2004) Complications encountered during lengthening over and intramedullary nail. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(11):2406–2411
Paley D, Herzenberg J, Paremain G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1464–1480
Singh S, Lahiri A, Iqbal M (2006) The results of limb lengthening by callus distraction using an extending intramedullary nail (Fitbone) in non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88(7):938–942
Cole J, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C (2001) The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury 32(Suppl 4):SD129–SD139
Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop 250:81–104
Kristiansen LP, Steen H (1999) Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidations in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand 70:271–274
Conflict of interest statement
No funds were received in support of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewster, M.B.S., Mauffrey, C., Lewis, A.C. et al. Lower limb lengthening: is there a difference in the lengthening index and infection rates of lengthening with external fixators, external fixators with intramedullary nails or intramedullary nailing alone? A systematic review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 20, 103–108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0504-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0504-0