Skip to main content
Log in

Non-operative treatment of injuries of the upper cervical spine: our experience with a new carbon fibre halo system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractures of the upper cervical spine account for about 20% of all cervical spinal injuries. Only in a minority of cases a neurological damage occurs. With exception of the type-2-dens fracture the treatment of choice is non-operatively in the halo-thoracic brace. We report about our experience with Bremer® Halo System, an open ring carbon fibre design which especially facilitates the treatment of head injured patients in bed. We treated 13 patients (m/w 9/4), mean ages 40 years (range 18–73) with 10 dens fractures Anderson and d’Alonzo-type III and 3 hangman’s fractures Effendi-type I. Five patients had additional head injury. Two of them were unconscious at the time of application of the halo-device. Our routine follow-up included roentgenograms after halo-application and 6 weeks later. After 3 months CT-scans were performed to evaluate fracture union. After 12–20 weeks the halo-device could be removed. We observed one halo ring loosening in a patient with oversize skull resulting in earlier removal in presence of an already established union. In one case we had a delayed union which eventually united in stiff collar after 6 month. No pin tract infection was observed. All patients returned to their pre-injury activities. A slightly limited rotation of the head was observed in most of the patients. The Bremer® Halo System proved to be a reliable unsophisticated halo system in the treatment of upper cervical spinal injuries. The feature of the open ring design especially facilitates the treatment of an accompanying head injury. We experienced a problem with a limited size of the halo ring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(8):1663–1674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boran S, Hurson C, Gul R, Higgins T, Poynton AR, OByrne J, McCormack D (2005) Functional outcome following teardrop fracture of the axis. Europ J Orthop Traumatol 15(3):229–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dussault RG, Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Laurin CA (1983) Locked facets with fracture of the neural arch of the axis. Spine 8(4):365–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Dussault RG, Laurin CA (1981) Fractures of the ring of the axis. A classification based on the analysis of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B(3):319–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Francis WR, Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ, Pepin J, Hensinger R (1981) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B(3):313–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadley MN (2002) Isolated fractures of the axis in adults. Neurosurgery 50(Suppl 3):S125–S139

    Google Scholar 

  7. Junge A, El-Sheik M, Celik I, Gotzen L (2002) Pathomorphology, diagnosis and treatment of “hangman’s fractures” (German). Unfallchirurg 105(9):775–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Komadina R, Brilej D, Kosanovic M, Vlaovic M (2003) Halo jacket in odontoid fractures type II and III. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(2–3):64–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korres DS, Papagelopoulos PJ, Petrou HG, Tzagarakis GP, Tritafyllidis P, Tsarouchas J, Koundis G (1999) Combined double fracture of the odontoid process and fracture of the atlas. Europ J Orthop Traumatol 9(3):195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korres DS, Papagelopoulos PJ, Petrou HG, Tzagarakis GP, Tritafyllidis P, Tsarouchas J, Koundis G (2005) Occult fracture-dislocation of the cervical spine. A case report and review of the literature. Europ J Orthop Traumatol 15(1):34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller EJ, Wick M, Muhr G (2000) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: treatment rationale based on the stability of the different fracture types. Eur Spine J 9(2):123–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider RC, Livingson KE, Cave AJE (1965) “Hangman’s fracture” of the cervical spine. J Neurosurgery 22:141–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Bauerle WB, Blescia A, Cotler JM (2002) Early halo immobilization of displaced traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Spine 27(20):2229–2233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vieweg U, Schultheiss R (1904) A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(1–2):50–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No funds were received in support of this study. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Schröder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröder, J., Wassmann, H. Non-operative treatment of injuries of the upper cervical spine: our experience with a new carbon fibre halo system. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 19, 423–426 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0441-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0441-y

Keywords

Navigation