The need for routine postoperative radiographs in hip fracture fixation: an audit-based approach

  • H. V. KurupEmail author
  • A. L. R. Michael
  • A. R. Beaumont
Original Article


This study was designed to establish whether obtaining routine postoperative radiographs following dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation served any useful clinical purpose. Fifty orthopaedic units in United Kingdom were randomly selected and surveyed, 18 of which routinely obtained check radiographs following DHS fixation. In our unit, routine postoperative films were being performed despite adequate image intensifier images being obtained and printed in theatre. In this study, 174 DHS fixations were reviewed and assessed for adequacy of image intensifier images by comparing them with formal postoperative radiographs. Hundred and fifteen of the 174 original fractures were deemed stable and showed no change of position of fracture or metal work on the postoperative films. Fifty-nine fractures were unstable, and of these, 14 were shown to have medialization of the femoral shaft on the postoperative radiographs as compared with the image intensifier images. The case notes of 132 of the total number of cases were reviewed and none of these patients underwent a change in postoperative mobilization status based on postoperative radiographic findings. These included the 14 unstable fractures. We conclude that obtaining routine check postoperative radiographs after DHS fixation is unnecessary provided adequate image intensifier images are obtained at the time of surgery.


Dynamic hip screw Postoperative Radiograph Image intensifier 


Conflict of interest statement

No funds were received in support of this study.


  1. 1.
    Glaser D, Lotke P (2000) Cost-effectiveness of immediate postoperative radiographs after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective and prospective study of 750 patients. J Arthroplasty 15:475–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haddad FS, Williams RL, Prendergast CM (1996) The check X-ray: an unnecessary investigation after hip fracture fixation? Injury 27:351–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harish S, Vince AS, Patel AD (1999) Routine radiography following ankle fracture fixation: a case for limiting its use. Injury 30:699–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaneriya PP, Schweitzer ME, Spettell C et al (1999) The cost-effectiveness of routine pelvic radiography in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. Skeletal Radiol 28:271–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (1994) Hip fractures: II. Evaluation and treatment of inter-trochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:150–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK et al (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pattison RM, Calzada S, Koka SR et al (1996) Postoperative radiographs or thermal prints after internal fixation of fractures? A study of DHS fixation of hip fractures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:509–511PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. V. Kurup
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. L. R. Michael
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. R. Beaumont
    • 1
  1. 1.Salisbury District HospitalSalisburyUK
  2. 2.Royal Glamorgan HospitalLlantrisantUK
  3. 3.Musgrave Park HospitalBelfastNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations