Skip to main content
Log in

An unfavourable outcome after periprosthetic fracture following metal-on-metal surface hip arthroplasty

Fracture périprothétique d’une PTH, mauvais résultat

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a case of a varus malunited periprosthetic femoral neck fracture following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing operation. Failure to closely observe and poor compliance in the young and active group of patients may contribute to such an unfavourable outcome.

Résumé

Les auteurs rapportent le cas d’une fracture du col fémoral après prothèse métal/métal de resurfaçage, ayant évolué vers un cal vicieux en varus. Le manque de suivi rapproché et de compliance chez les patients jeunes et actifs peut contribuer à cette évolution défavorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ (2005) The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 20(3):358–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cumming D, Fordyce MJF (2003) Non-operative management of a peri-prosthetic subcapital fracture after metal-on-metal birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:1055–1056

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R (2002) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 12(2):158–162

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebied A, Journeaux S (2002) Metal on metal hip resurfacing. Curr Orthop 16:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedley AK (1981) Complications of surface replacements. Instr Course Lect 30:444–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop 329(Suppl):S89–S98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD, Hungerford DS (2001) Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty 16(8 Suppl 1):134–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray WR, Van Meter JW (1982) Surface replacement hip arthroplasty: results of the first seventy-four consecutive cases at the University of California, San Francisco. Hip 156–166

  9. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz HC (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation, and early results. Clin Orthop 329(Suppl):S106–S114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, H., Rana, B., Noor-Shaari, E. et al. An unfavourable outcome after periprosthetic fracture following metal-on-metal surface hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16, 169–171 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-005-0044-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-005-0044-1

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation