Skip to main content
Log in

Excessive posterior placement of upper instrumented vertebra relative to lower instrumented vertebra as a predictor of proximal junction kyphosis after selective spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 5C curves

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We defined sagittal S-line tilt (SSLT) as the tilt of the line connecting the upper instrumented vertebra and the lower instrumented vertebra. This study aimed to: (1) examine the correlation between SSLT and proximal junctional angle (PJA) change values, and (2) determine the cut-off value of SSLT with respect to proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) occurrence.

Methods

Eighty-six consecutive patients (81 female and 5 male; mean age: 15.8 years) with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent posterior selective spinal fusion. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between preoperative SSLT and changes in PJA from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. The impact of SSLT on PJK at 2 years after surgery was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

We observed a moderate positive correlation between preoperative SSLT and change in PJA (R = 0.541, P < 0.001). We identified 18 patients (21%) with PJK at 2 years postoperative. Mean preoperative SSLT in the PJK group and the non-PJK group differed significantly at 23.3 ± 4.1° and 16.1 ± 5.0°, respectively (P < 0.001). The cut-off value of preoperative SSLT for PJK at 2 years postoperative was 18° in ROC curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 68%, and area under the ROC curve of 0.868.

Conclusion

In selective lumbar fusion for AIS Lenke type 5C curves, preoperative SSLT was significantly correlated with PJA change from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. SSLT was a predictor of PJK occurrence, with a cut-off value of 18°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA 289:559–567. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.5.559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhong J, Cao K, Wang B et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after correction surgery: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 125:e326–e335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrero E, Bocahut N, Lefevre Y et al (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort. Eur Spine J 27:2241–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 32:2731–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7ead

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, Lenke LG, Chotigavanichaya C, Hanson DS (2002) Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 27:2350–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211010-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH 3rd, Huss GK (1999) Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:795–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199904150-00011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Yang N, Luo M, Xia L, Li N (2020) Large difference between proximal junctional angle and rod contouring angle is a risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis. World Neurosurg 136:e683–e689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO et al (2010) Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine 35:177–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c77f8c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG et al (2021) Incidence and radiological risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw instrumentation with rod derotation and direct vertebral rotation: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Med 10:5351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan C, Li Y, Yu Z (2016) Prevalence and Consequences of the Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3471. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J, Fan H, Sui W et al (2021) Risk and predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in patients treated by lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction. World Neurosurg 147:e315–e323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou Q, Hu B, Yang X et al (2021) Proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke 5 AIS patients: the important factor of pelvic incidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04052-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boeckenfoerde K, Schulze Boevingloh A, Gosheger G, Bockholt S, Lampe LP, Lange T (2022) Risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-the spinous processes and proximal rod contouring. J Clin Med 11:6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206098

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Oba H, Takahashi J, Kobayashi S et al (2019) Upper instrumented vertebra to the right of the lowest instrumented vertebra as a predictor of an increase in the main thoracic curve after selective posterior fusion for the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: multicenter study on the relationship between fusion area and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 23:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.5.SPINE181469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang T, Shu S, Jing W et al (2021) Optimizing the fusion level for lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is the S-line a validated and reproducible tool to predict coronal decompensation? Eur Spine J 30:1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06781-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, Lenke LG (2008) Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.: 11–24. https://www.srs.org/Files/Research/Manuals-and-Publications/sdsg-radiographic-measuremnt-manual.pdf

  17. Yan P, Bao H, Qiu Y et al (2017) Mismatch between proximal rod contouring and proximal junctional angle: a predisposed risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative scoliosis. Spine 42:E280-e7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang B, Xu L, Wang M et al (2022) Unmatched rod contouring at the proximal end predisposes to occurrence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis patients undergoing traditional growing rods treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:624. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05564-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B (2002) Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients quality of life questionnaire responses. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:462–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao J, Yang M, Yang Y, Chen Z, Li M (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis following correction surgery in the Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient. J Orthop Sci 23:744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lonner BS, Ren Y, Newton PO et al (2017) Risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-the pelvis and other considerations. Spine Deform 5:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Albay C, Kaygusuz MA, Kargın D, Öner A (2022) Correlations of proximal junctional kyphosis with radiographic measurements, spinopelvic parameters, and health-related quality of life in Lenke type V adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Jt Dis Relat Surg 33(1):162–71. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Banno T, Yamato Y, Oba H et al (2021) Preoperative thoracic curve magnitude and L4 end vertebra were risk factors for subjacent disc wedging after selective thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion with l3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra in lenke type 5 curve patients. Spine 46:E878-e87. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Erkilinc M, Baldwin KD, Pasha S, Mistovich RJ (2022) Proximal junctional kyphosis in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and critical analysis. Spine Deform 10:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00429-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There are no relevant financial activities outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Oba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained by all participants in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

586_2024_8427_MOESM1_ESM.pptx

Supplementary file1 Association between preoperative sagittal S-line tilt (SSLT) and preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (PPTX 47 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 40 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oba, H., Banno, T., Ohba, T. et al. Excessive posterior placement of upper instrumented vertebra relative to lower instrumented vertebra as a predictor of proximal junction kyphosis after selective spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 5C curves. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08427-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08427-y

Keywords

Navigation