Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of ultrasound volume navigation, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance for screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the differences between Ultrasound Volume Navigation (UVN), O-arm Navigation, and conventional X-ray fluoroscopy-guided screw placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgeries.

Methods

A total of 90 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF due to lumbar disc herniation from January 2022 to January 2023 were randomly assigned to the UVN group, O-arm group, and X-ray group. UVN, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance were used for screw placement in the respective groups, while the remaining surgical procedures followed routine MIS-TLIF protocols. Intraoperative data including average single screw placement time, total radiation dose, and average effective radiation dose per screw were recorded and calculated. On the 10th day after surgery, postoperative X-ray and CT examinations were conducted to assess screw placement accuracy and facet joint violation.

Results

There were no significant differences in general characteristics among the three groups, ensuring comparability. Firstly, the average single screw placement time in the O-arm group was significantly shorter than that in the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). Secondly, in terms of total radiation dose during surgery, for single-level MIS-TLIF, the O-arm group had a significantly higher radiation dose compared to the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). However, for multi-level MIS-TLIF, the X-ray group had a significantly higher radiation dose than the O-arm group and UVN group (P<0.05). In terms of average single screw radiation dose, the O-arm group and X-ray group were similar (P>0.05), while the UVN group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in screw placement assessment grades among the three groups (P>0.05). However, in terms of facet joint violation rate, the UVN group (10.3%) and O-arm group (10.7%) showed no significant difference (P>0.05), while the X-ray group (26.7%) was significantly higher than both groups (P<0.05). Moreover, in the UVN group, there were significant correlations between average single screw placement time and placement grade with BMI index (r = 0.637, P<0.05; r = 0.504, P<0.05), while no similar significant correlations were found in the O-arm and X-ray groups.

Conclusion

UVN-guided screw placement in MIS-TLIF surgeries demonstrates comparable efficiency, visualization, and accuracy to O-arm navigation, while significantly reducing radiation exposure compared to both O-arm navigation and X-ray guidance. However, UVN may be influenced by factors like obesity, limiting its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP (2021) Low back pain. Lancet 398(10294):78–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC (2022) Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. JAMA 327(17):1688–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao Y, Bo X, Wang C et al (2018) Guided punctures with Ultrasound volume Navigation in Percutaneous Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a technical note. World Neurosurg 119:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coric D, Rossi VJ, Peloza J, Kim PK, Adamson TE (2020) Percutaneous, navigated minimally invasive posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation. Int J Spine Surg 14(s3):S14–S21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu H, Wu J, Tang Y et al (2019) Percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws via intraoperative CT image-based augmented reality-guided technology. J Neurosurg Spine 1–6

  6. McCloskey K, Turlip R, Ahmad HS, Ghenbot YG, Chauhan D, Yoon JW (2023) Virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 173

  7. Zhang M, Li J, Fang T, Yan J, Wu L, Zhou Q (2022) Application of 3-dimensional printing guide template and pointed lotus-style regulator in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Sci Rep 12(1):2930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng B, Wu C, Li T, Wang X, Shang Q (2021) Three-dimensional printed drill guide template assisting percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for multiple-level thoracolumbar fractures. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 35(6):742–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin S, Wang F, Hu J, Tang L-Y (2022) Comparison of the accuracy and safety of tirobot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Surg 14(11):2955–2963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang J-S, He B, Tian F et al (2019) Accuracy of Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative cohort study. Med Sci Monit 25:2479–2487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Panchmatia JR, Vaccaro AR, Wang W, Harris JA, Bucklen BS (2020) Lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw breach rates: a comparison of robotic Navigation platform Versus Conventional techniques. Clin Spine Surg 33(4):E162–E167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang C-C, Chang H-K, Wu J-C, Tu T-H, Cheng H, Huang W-C (2020) Comparison of Radiation exposure between O-Arm navigated and C-Arm guided screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 139:e489–e495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HC, Jeong YH, Oh SH et al (2022) Single-position oblique lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw fixation under O-Arm Navigation: a retrospective comparative study. J Clin Med 12(1)

  14. Li C, Li H, Su J et al (2022) Comparison of the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement using a fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand technique with robotic-assisted Navigation using an O-Arm or 3D C-Arm in scoliosis surgery. Global Spine J 21925682221143076

  15. Feng W, Wang W, Chen S, Wu K, Wang H (2020) O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 44(5):919–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouchida J, Kanemura T, Satake K, Nakashima H, Ishikawa Y, Imagama S (2020) Simultaneous single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using O-arm-based navigation reduces the occupancy time of the operating room. Eur Spine J 29(6):1277–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y-B, Wang Y, Chen Z-Q et al (2018) Volume Navigation with Fusion of Real-Time Ultrasound and CT images to Guide Posterolateral Transforaminal puncture in Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pain Physician 21(3):E265–E278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapey J, Dowrick T, Delaunay R et al (2021) Integrated multi-modality image-guided navigation for neurosurgery: open-source software platform using state-of-the-art clinical hardware. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 16(8):1347–1356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Moritz A-K, Winter K, Köhler C, Alef M, Kiefer I (2019) [Evaluation of the accuracy of volume navigation of sonography and computed tomography using a phantom]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 47(5):322–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyata A, Arita J, Kawaguchi Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N (2020) Simulation and navigation liver surgery: an update after 2,000 virtual hepatectomies. Glob Health Med 2(5):298–305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zielinski AH, Bredahl KK, Ghulam QM et al (2022) Full-volume Assessment of Abdominal aortic aneurysm by improved-field-of-view 3-D Ultrasound performs comparably to computed Tomographic Angiography. Ultrasound Med Biol 48(2):283–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao Y, Yan N, Yu S et al (2018) Reduced Radiation exposure and puncture time of Percutaneous Transpedicular puncture with real-time ultrasound volume Navigation. World Neurosurg 119

  23. Wang Bing L, Tao (2019) Clinical comparison of Ultrasound volume Navigation and X-ray fluoroscopy-guided Transforaminal endoscopic techniques for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation. J Cervicodynia Lumbodynia 40(03):370–372

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chan A, Parent E, Mahood J, Lou E (2022) 3D ultrasound navigation system for screw insertion in posterior spine surgery: a phantom study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 17(2):271–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo Chu L, Da W, Wenbo S, Ling Z, Sai (2018) Fusion Method of Ultrasound images and CT images based on electromagnetic localization. Chin J Biomedical Eng 37(05):529–536

    Google Scholar 

  26. Du Xinru Z, Lingxiu Z, Yimo Y, Qibin (2002) Anatomical study on Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique at the apex of Sacral Alar. Chin J Clin Anat. (02):86–88

  27. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N (2007) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 16(5):613–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Richter PH, Gebhard F (2023) [Application of navigation in the fractured spine]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 35(1):29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin X, Shang L, Shen S et al (2023) [Clinical application of percutaneous pedicle screw placement guided by ultrasound volume navigation combined with X-ray fluoroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study] [J]. Zhong Guo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 37(10):1253–1258

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hadgaonkar S, Gupta A, Aiyer S et al (2023) Learning curve across 2000 thoracolumbar pedicle screw placements using O-arm navigation: technical difficulties and their solutions [J]. Eur Spine J 32(11):3753–3763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Silva T, Uneri A, Zhang X et al (2018) Real-time, image-based slice-to-volume registration for ultrasound-guided spinal intervention. Phys Med Biol 63(21):215016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

2020 Medical and Health Guiding Science and Technology Plan Project of Luoyang City (2040007 A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Approval Number: KY2022-013-02). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The use of AI and AI-assisted technologies

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, X., Chang, Q., Shang, L. et al. A comparison of ultrasound volume navigation, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance for screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08390-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08390-8

Keywords

Navigation