Skip to main content
Log in

A pig model of symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish an animal model capable of simulating the development and decompression process of symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH).

Methods

A total of 16 male Bama miniature pigs were included in this study and randomly allocated into four groups: Group A (4 h 20 mmHg hematoma compression), Group B (4 h 24 mmHg hematoma compression), Group C (4 h 28 mmHg hematoma compression), and Group Sham (control). Real-time intra-wound hematoma compression values were obtained using the principle of connectors. Electrophysiological analyses, including the latency and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP), along with behavioral observations (Tarlov score), were performed to assess this model.

Results

ANOVA tests demonstrated significant differences in the latency and relative amplitude of SSEP and MEP between Groups C and Sham after 4 h of hematoma compression and one month after surgery (P < 0.01). Behavioral assessments 8 h after surgery indicated that animals subjected to 28 mmHg hematoma compression suffered the most severe spinal cord injury. Pearson correlation coefficient test suggested a negative correlation between the epidural pressure and Tarlov score (r = −0.700, p < 0.001). With the progression of compression and the escalation of epidural pressure, the latency of SSEP and MEP gradually increased, while the relative amplitude gradually decreased.

Conclusions

When the epidural pressure reaches approximately 24 mmHg, the spinal cord function occurs progressive dysfunction. Monitoring epidural pressure would be an effective approach to assist to identify the occurrence of postoperative SSEH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boukobza M, Guichard JP, Boissonet M, George B, Reizine D, Gelbert F, Merland JJ (1994) Spinal epidural haematoma: report of 11 cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiology 36(6):456–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiri AR, Fouyas IP, Cro S, Casey AT (2013) Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH): incidence, risk factors, onset, and management. Spine J 13(2):134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Sato T, Yamanaka H, Tamai H et al (2019) Post-operative spinal epidural hematoma after thoracic and lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine Surg Relat Res 3(3):244–248. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2018-0086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Q, Zhong X, Liu W, Wong C, He Q, Chen Y (2022) Incidence of postoperative symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 31(12):3274–3285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07421-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler AJ, Donnally CJ 3rd, Goz V, Basques BA, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD (2022) Symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma in the lumbar Spine. Clin Spine Surg 35(9):354–362. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leroy HA, Portella T, Amouyel T, Bougeard R, Assaker R, Mourier KL (2021) Management of symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma in spine surgery: medicolegal implications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107(7):103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreppel D, Antoniadis G, Seeling W (2003) Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients. Neurosurg Rev 26(1):1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-002-0224-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Kim SH, Shin HC (2006) Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma: risk factor and clinical outcome. Yonsei Med J 47(3):326–332. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.3.326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Mutair A, Bednar DA (2010) Spinal epidural hematoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(8):494–502. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201008000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattucci S, Speidel J, Liu J, Tetzlaff W, Oxland TR (2021) Temporal progression of acute spinal cord injury mechanisms in a rat model: contusion, dislocation, and distraction. J Neurotrauma 38(15):2103–2121. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu HZ, Jeffery ND, Granger N (2018) Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in dogs with chronic severe thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. Vet J 237:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.05.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agrawal G, Thakor NV, All AH (2009) Evoked potential versus behavior to detect minor insult to the spinal cord in a rat model. J Clin Neurosci 16(8):1052–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (1999) Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Somatosensory evoked potentials: clinical uses. Muscle Nerve Suppl 8:S111–S118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cloud BA, Ball BG, Chen BK, Knight AM, Hakim JS, Ortiz AM, Windebank AJ (2012) Hemisection spinal cord injury in rat: the value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Neurosci Methods 211(2):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maier S, Goebel U et al (2018) Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0205410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McHugh ML (2011) Multiple comparison analysis testing in ANOVA. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 21(3):203–209. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2011.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agrawal G, Kerr C, Thakor NV, All AH (2010) Characterization of graded multicenter animal spinal cord injury study contusion spinal cord injury using somatosensory-evoked potentials. Spine 35(11):1122–1127. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181be5fa7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou Y, Nie L, Liu LH, Shao J, Yuan YJ (2008) Changes of somatosensory and transcranial magnetic stimulation motor evoked potentials in experimental spinal cord injury. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 88(11):773–777 (Chinese)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein CL, Bains I, Hurlbert RJ (2015) Symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma after posterior cervical surgery: incidence and risk factors. Spine J 15(6):1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawton MT, Porter RW, Heiserman JE, Jacobowitz R, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA (1995) Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg 83(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniels AH, Schiebert SS, Palumbo MA (2015) Symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma after lumbar spine surgery: the importance of diagnostic skills. AORN J 101(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.03.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The publication of this article was supported by Innovation & Transfer Fund of Peking University Third Hospital, granted BYSYZHZB2021102.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the article conception and design. PH, HZ and ZL decided to content. XL, SZ, and HL were the guarantors of the overall content. ZL and JC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. FW and XL revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zihe Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (NO. A2021420).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Li, H., Zeng, S. et al. A pig model of symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08188-8

Keywords

Navigation