Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.

Results

Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (p = 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (p = 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (p = 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (p = 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (p = 0.9).

Conclusion

HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. LaMont LE, Jo C, Molinari S, Tran D, Caine H, Brown K, Wittenbrook W, Schochet P, Johnston CE, Ramo B (2019) Radiographic, pulmonary, and clinical outcomes with halo gravity traction. Spine Deform 7:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koptan W, ElMiligui Y (2012) Three-staged correction of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis using limited halo-gravity traction. Eur Spine J 21:1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2111-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Han B, Hai Y, Su Q, Chen Y (2021) How helpful is the halo-gravity traction in severe spinal deformity patients?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 30:3162–3171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06902-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon A-L, Angelliaume A, Happiette A, Huneidi M, Julien-Marsollier F, Ilharreborde B (2021) Halo-gravity traction followed by definitive fusion in severe early onset scoliosis: results of a trunk analysis based on biplanar 3D reconstructions. Eur Spine J 30:3540–3549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06986-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sponseller PD, Takenaga RK, Newton P, Boachie O, Flynn J, Letko L, Betz R, Bridwell K, Gupta M, Marks M, Bastrom T (2008) The use of traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity. Spine 33:2305–2309. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318184ef79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang C, Wang H, Zheng Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Liu H, Kim YJ, Cho S (2017) Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26:1810–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4848-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koller H, Zenner J, Gajic V, Meier O, Ferraris L, Hitzl W (2012) The impact of halo-gravity traction on curve rigidity and pulmonary function in the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis: a clinical study and narrative review of the literature. Eur Spine J 21:514–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2046-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suk S-I, Kim J-H, Cho K-J, Kim SS, Lee JJ, Han YT (2007) Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation? Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 16:1359–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0334-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M (2005) Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine 30:2061–2067. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179299.78791.96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X-B, Lenke LG, Thuet E, Blanke K, Koester LA, Roth M (2016) Deformity angular ratio describes the severity of spinal deformity and predicts the risk of neurologic deficit in posterior vertebral column resection surgery. Spine 41:1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards C 2nd (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 30:1643–1649. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169451.76359.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park DK, Braaksma B, Hammerberg KW, Sturm P (2013) The efficacy of preoperative halo-gravity traction in pediatric spinal deformity the effect of traction duration. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0b013e318237828c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rocos B, Reda L, Lebel DE, Dodds MK, Zeller R (2021) The use of halo gravity traction in severe, stiff scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 41:338–343. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shimizu T, Lenke LG, Cerpa M, Lehman RA Jr, Pongmanee S, Sielatycki JA (2020) Preoperative halo-gravity traction for treatment of severe adult kyphosis and scoliosis. Spine Deform 8:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-019-00017-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reed LA, Mihas A, Butler R, Pratheep G, Manoharan SR, Theiss S, Viswanathan VK (2022) Halo gravity traction for the correction of spinal deformities in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 164:e636–e648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Victor DI, Bresnan MJ, Keller RB (1973) Brain abscess complicating the use of halo traction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ginsburg GM, Bassett GS (1998) Hypoglossal nerve injury caused by halo-suspension traction. A case report Spine 23:1490–1493. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199807010-00011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Qian B, Qiu Y, Wang B (2006) Brachial plexus palsy associated with halo traction before posterior correction in severe scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:538–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

SOFOP group author: SOFOP: French Society Orthopaedic Pediatric, Marseille, France. Franck Accadbled: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Purpan Children’s Hospital, Toulouse University, 330 Avenue de la Grande Bretagne, 31000, Purpan, Toulouse, France. Emilie André: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France. Damien Fron: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France. Antoine Hamel: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France. Adèle Happiette: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Robert Debré, APHP, Paris, France. Thierry Haumont: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Lyon, France. Brice Ilharreborde: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Robert Debré, APHP, Paris, France. Pierre Journeau: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Nancy, Nancy, France. Yan Lefèvre: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Gregory Lucas: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Sud, Rennes University, Rennes, France. Christian Morin: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, Institut Calot, Berck-sur-Mer, France. Thierry Odent: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU Tours, Tours, France. Sébastien Pesenti: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France. Jérôme Sales de Gauzy: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Purpan Children’s Hospital, Toulouse University, 330 Avenue de la Grande Bretagne, 31000, Purpan, Toulouse, France. Catalin Ursu: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, Institut Calot, Berck-sur-Mer, France. Raphaël Vialle: Department of Pediatric Orthopedic surgery, CHU A. Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

TL Writing—original draft preparation AJ Formal analysis and investigation PV Conceptualization and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tristan Langlais.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was registered in the National Commission on Informatics and Freedoms (CNIL) database register (No 2220247) and the patients were informed and consented before any data collection and/or analysis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP) are listed in the Acknowledgements section.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langlais, T., Josse, A., Violas, P. et al. Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Eur Spine J 33, 713–722 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z

Keywords

Navigation