Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to find a standard of the vertebra kinematics during functional weight-bearing activities in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients.
Methods
Fifty-four patients were involved into this study with forty-two in DLS group and twelve in the control group. The three-dimensional (3D) vertebral models from L1 to S1 of each participant were reconstructed by computed tomography (CT). Dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging, along with FluoMotion and Rhinoceros software, was used to record segmental vertebral kinematics during functional weight-bearing activities. The primary and coupled motions of each vertebra were analyzed in patients with DLS.
Results
During flexion–extension of the trunk, anteroposterior (AP) translation and craniocaudal (CC) translation at L5–S1 were higher than those at L2–3 (9.3 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.4 ± 3.5 mm; P < 0.05). The coupled mediolateral (ML) translation at L5–S1 in patients with DLS was approximately three times greater than that in the control group. During left–right bending of the trunk, the coupled ML rotation at L5–S1 was higher in patients with DLS than that in the control group (17.7 ± 10.3° vs. 8.4 ± 4.4°; P < 0.05). The AP and CC translations at L5–S1 were higher than those at L1–2, L2–3, and L3–4. During left–right torsion of the trunk, the AP translation at L5–S1 was higher as compared to other levels.
Conclusions
The greatest coupled translation was observed at L5–S1 in patients with DLS. Coupled AP and ML translations at L5–S1 were higher than those in healthy participants. These data improved the understanding of DLS motion characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14(10):925–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9
Battié MC, Videman T (2006) Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 2):3–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.01313
Carter OD, Haynes SG (1987) Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol 16(4):537–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/16.4.537
Gupta MC (2003) Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management. Orthop Clin North Am 34(2):269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(03)00029-4
Pérennou D, Marcelli C, Hérisson C, Simon L (1994) Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199401001-00001
Robin GC, Span Y, Steinberg R, Makin M, Menczel J (1982) Scoliosis in the elderly: a follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7(4):355–359. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198207000-00005
Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2171–2178. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8fdc8
Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS (1999) Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(24):2617–2629. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199912150-00009
Brown KM, Ludwig SC, Gelb DE (2004) Radiographic predictors of outcome after long fusion to L5 in adult scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(5):358–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000112080.04960.67
Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(7):776–786. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204010-00017
Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB (1994) Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(14):1619–1627. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199407001-00011
Winter RB, Denis F, Lonstein JE, Dezen E (1991) Salvage and reconstructive surgery for spinal deformity using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(8 Suppl):S412–S417
Wang W, Baran GR, Betz RR, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Cahill PJ (2014) The use of finite element models to assist understanding and treatment for scoliosis: a review paper. Spine Deform 2(1):10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.09.007
Bisschop A, Holewijn RM, Kingma I, Stadhouder A, Vergroesen PP, van der Veen AJ, van Dieën JH, van Royen BJ (2015) The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics. Global Spine J 5(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395783
Bisschop A, van Engelen SJ, Kingma I, Holewijn RM, Stadhouder A, van der Veen AJ, van Dieën JH, van Royen BJ (2014) Single level lumbar laminectomy alters segmental biomechanical behavior without affecting adjacent segments. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 29(8):912–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.016
Busscher I, van Dieën JH, Kingma I, van der Veen AJ, Verkerke GJ, Veldhuizen AG (2009) Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(26):2858–2864. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4c75d
Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7(2):148–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050045
Haddas R, Xu M, Lieberman I, Yang J (2019) Finite element based-analysis for pre and post lumbar fusion of adult degenerative scoliosis patients. Spine Deform 7(4):543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.11.008
Park WM, Kim K, Kim YH (2013) Effects of degenerated intervertebral discs on intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressures, and facet joint forces of the whole lumbar spine. Comput Biol Med 43(9):1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.06.011
Li G, Wang S, Passias P, Xia Q, Li G, Wood K (2009) Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities. Eur Spine J 18(7):1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0936-6
Shin JH, Wang S, Yao Q, Wood KB, Li G (2013) Investigation of coupled bending of the lumbar spine during dynamic axial rotation of the body. Eur Spine J 22(12):2671–2677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2777-6
Wu M, Wang S, Driscoll SJ, Cha TD, Wood KB, Li G (2014) Dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: implication to lumbar pathology and surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 23(11):2350–2358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3316-9
Wang S, Passias P, Li G, Li G, Wood K (2008) Measurement of vertebral kinematics using noninvasive image matching method-validation and application. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(11):E355–E361. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181715295
Roman I, Luyten M, Croonenborghs H, Lason G, Peeters L, Byttebier G, Comhaire F (2019) Relating the Diers formetric measurements with the subjective severity of acute and chronic low back pain. Med Hypotheses 133:109390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109390
Passias PG, Wang S, Kozanek M, Xia Q, Li W, Grottkau B, Wood KB, Li G (2011) Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.01348
Li W, Wang S, Xia Q, Passias P, Kozanek M, Wood K, Li G (2011) Lumbar facet joint motion in patients with degenerative disc disease at affected and adjacent levels: an in vivo biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(10):E629–E637. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181faaef7
Yao Q, Wang S, Shin JH, Li G, Wood KB (2013) Lumbar facet joint motion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(1):E19-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827a254f
Wang L, Zhang B, Chen S, Lu X, Li ZY, Guo Q (2016) A validated finite element analysis of facet joint stress in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. World Neurosurg 95:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.106
Zheng J, Yang Y, Lou S, Zhang D, Liao S (2015) Construction and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of degenerative scoliosis. J Orthop Surg Res 10:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0334-1
Rustenburg CME, Kingma I, Holewijn RM, Faraj SSA, van der Veen A, Bisschop A, de Kleuver M, Emanuel KS (2020) Biomechanical properties in motion of lumbar spines with degenerative scoliosis. J Biomech 102:109495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109495
Veldhuizen AG, Scholten PJ (1987) Kinematics of the scoliotic spine as related to the normal spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12(9):852–858. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198711000-00005
du Rose A, Breen A (2016) Relationships between paraspinal muscle activity and lumbar inter-vertebral range of motion. Healthcare (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4010004
Sadler SG, Spink MJ, Ho A, De Jonge XJ, Chuter VH (2017) Restriction in lateral bending range of motion, lumbar lordosis, and hamstring flexibility predicts the development of low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1534-0
Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F (2007) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J 7(4):428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015
Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(18):1996–2005
Horton WC, Holt RT, Muldowny DS (1996) Controversy. Fusion of L5–S1 in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(21):2520–2522. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611010-00024
Simmons ED Jr, Kowalski JM, Simmons EH (1993) The results of surgical treatment for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(6):718–724. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199305000-00008
Funding
This article is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81871807).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, F., Lin, J., Jiang, S. et al. In vivo segmental vertebral kinematics in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 33, 571–581 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07974-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07974-0