Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical techniques and perioperative surgical outcomes after discectomy for calcified lumbar disc herniation: a review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Calcified lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) poses surgical challenges due to longstanding disease and adherence of herniated disc to the surrounding neural structures. The data regarding outcomes after surgery for CLDH are limited. This review was conducted to analyse the surgical techniques, perioperative findings and the postoperative clinical outcomes after surgery for CLDH.

Methods

PRISMA guidelines were followed whilst conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. The literature review was conducted on 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL). After thorough screening of all search results, 9 studies were shortlisted from which data were extracted and statistical analysis was done. Pooled analysis was done to ascertain the perioperative and postoperative outcomes after surgery for CLDH. Additional comparative analysis was done compared to CLDH with non-calcified lumbar disc herniation (NCLDH) cases.

Results

We included 9 studies published between 2016 and 2022 in our review, 8 of these were retrospective. A total of 356 cases of CLDH were evaluated in these studies with a male preponderance (56.4%). Mean operative time was significantly lower in NCLDH cases compared to CLDH cases. The mean estimated blood loss showed a negative correlation with the percentage of males. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were observed in majority of patients. The risk of bias of the included studies was moderate to high.

Conclusion

Surgical difficulties in CLDH cases leads to increase in operative time compared to NCLDH. Good clinical outcomes can be obtained with careful planning; the focus of surgery should be on decompression of the neural structures rather than disc removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK (2014) Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J 14:2525–2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson JN, Waddell G (2005) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2312–2320. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000182315.88558.9c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S (2016) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochr Datab Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010264.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE (2013) Clinical success of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminotomy: a retrospective evaluation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1961–1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.05.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azizaddini S, Arefanian S, Redjal N, Walcott BP, Mollahoseini R (2013) Adult acute calcific discitis confined to the nucleus pulposus in the cervical spine: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 19:170–173. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerlach R, Zimmermann M, Kellermann S, Lietz R, Raabe A, Seifert V (2001) Intervertebral disc calcification in childhood–a case report and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HS, Adsul N, Ju YS et al (2018) Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy using the calcification floating technique for symptomatic partially calcified lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. World Neurosurg 119:500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Albeck MJ, Madsen FF, Wagner A, Gjerris F (1991) Fracture of the lumbar vertebral ring apophysis imitating disc herniation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 113:52–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao J, Yu M, Jiang L et al (2016) Differences in calcification and osteogenic potential of herniated discs according to the severity of degeneration based on Pfirrmann grade: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1015-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M (2010) Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 19:181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1155-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JW, Lee JK, Moon KS, Hur H, Kim YS, Kim SH (2007) Transdural approach for calcified central disc herniations of the upper lumbar spine. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 7:370–374. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/09/370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gille O, Soderlund C, Razafimahandri HJ, Mangione P, Vital JM (2006) Analysis of hard thoracic herniated discs: review of 18 cases operated by thoracoscopy. Eur Spine J 15:537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1014-33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Karamouzian S, Eskandary H, Faramarzee M et al (2010) Frequency of lumbar intervertebral disc calcification and angiogenesis, and their correlation with clinical, surgical, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(8):881–886. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9c986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dabo X, Ziqiang C, Yinchuan Z et al (2016) The clinical results of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a case-control study. Pain Physician 19:69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu L, Wen JK, Wang S, Wang WH, Yu JM, Ye XJ (2020) Removal of calcified lumbar disc herniation with endoscopic-matched ultrasonic osteotome - Our preliminary experience. Br J Neurosurg 34:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2019.1687850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Wang JX, Sun B et al (2019) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in treating calcified lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. World Neurosurg 122:e1449–e1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin SH, Bae JS, Lee SH, Keum HJ, Jang WS (2020) Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation: a new surgical technique and clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg 143:e224–e231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang D, Xing J, Shao B et al (2020) A surgical decompression procedure for effective treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation. J Int Med Res 48:300060520938966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520938966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang H, Zhou T, Gu Y, Yan Z (2021) Evaluation of efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for surgical treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study of 101 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03938-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng YP, Cheng XK, Wu H (2022) A comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and transforaminal discectomy for L5–S1 calcified lumbar disc herniation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05186-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan AL, Shen X, Chen B (2022) Treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation by intervertebral foramen remolding: a retrospective study. J Pain Res 15:1719–1728. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S357033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bagatur AE, Zorer G, Centel T (2001) Natural history of paediatric intervertebral disc calcification. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:601–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020100297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeung AT, Tsou PM (2002) Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:722–731. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schubert M, Hoogland T (2005) Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17:641–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-005-1156-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, Lee SH, Lee HN (2014) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 75:124–133. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, Choi YG, Kim HJ, Lee SH (2009) Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46:515–521. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2007) Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine 6:521–530. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.6.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fakouri B, Shetty NR, White TC (2015) Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1957–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3904-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kotil K, Köksal NS, Kayaci S (2014) Long term results of lumbar sequestrectomy versus aggressive microdiscectomy. J Clin Neurosci 21:1714–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barth M, Weiss C, Thomé C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318162018c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang Y, Yin J, Sun Z et al (2020) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for LDH via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach: a meta-analysis. Perkutane endoskopische lumbale Diskektomie bei lumbalem Bandscheibenvorfall mittels transforaminaler vs. interlaminarer Verfahren: eine Metaanalyse. Orthopade 49:338–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-019-03710-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parth Bansal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This kind of study does not require ethical approval.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Bansal, P., Dhillon, M. et al. Surgical techniques and perioperative surgical outcomes after discectomy for calcified lumbar disc herniation: a review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 33, 47–60 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07914-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07914-y

Keywords

Navigation