Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vertebral bone quality score for opportunistic osteoporosis screening: a correlation and optimal threshold analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score as a potential tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and its correlation with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) values.

Methods

In a single-center retrospective cohort of 130 patients, VBQ and DXA measures were compared using various statistical analyses. The optimal VBQ threshold for predicting osteoporosis was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

VBQ exhibited a significant negative association with DXA values, suggesting that higher VBQ scores are indicative of lower bone density. Age and VBQ were significant predictors of osteoporosis, with both increasing the log-odds of the condition. An optimal VBQ threshold of 2.7 was determined, demonstrating fair discriminatory power and high negative predictive value.

Conclusion

The study highlighted the potential of VBQ as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis with high intra- and inter-observer reliability. The optimal VBQ threshold of 2.7 can aid in ruling out osteoporosis and identifying individuals for further evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References:

  1. Peck W (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, Dawson-Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29:2520–2526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salari N, Ghasemi H, Mohammadi L, Rabieenia E, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M (2021) The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kanis JA, Kanis J (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporos Int 4:368–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinheiro MB, Oliveira J, Bauman A, Fairhall N, Kwok W, Sherrington C (2020) Evidence on physical activity and osteoporosis prevention for people aged 65+ years: a systematic review to inform the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Sawka A, Hopman WM, Pickard L, Brown JP, Josse RG, Kaiser S, Anastassiades T (2009) The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 20:703–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW, Kemper AR, Kubik M (2018) Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 319:2521–2531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuner JM, Binkley N, Sparapani RA, Laud PW, Nattinger AB (2006) Bone density testing in older women and its association with patient age. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehresman J, Pennington Z, Schilling A, Lubelski D, Ahmed AK, Cottrill E, Khan M, Sciubba DM (2020) Novel MRI-based score for assessment of bone density in operative spine patients. The Spine Journal 20:556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Maher CG, Moloney NA, Magnussen JS, Hancock MJ (2018) Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Spine Journal 18:2266–2277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang W, Gong Z, Wang H, Zheng C, Chen Y, Xia X, Ma X, Jiang J (2023) Use of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score (VBQ) of S1 body in bone mineral density assessment for patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J:1–8

  12. Kim AYE, Lyons K, Sarmiento M, Lafage V, Iyer S (2023) MRI-based Score for assessment of bone mineral density in operative spine patients. Spine 48:107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pouresmaeili F, Kamalidehghan B, Kamarehei M, Goh YM (2018) A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther Clin Risk Manag:2029–2049

  14. Löffler MT, Jacob A, Scharr A, Sollmann N, Burian E, El Husseini M, Sekuboyina A, Tetteh G, Zimmer C, Gempt J (2021) Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA. Eur Radiol 31:6069–6077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Löffler MT, Jacob A, Valentinitsch A, Rienmüller A, Zimmer C, Ryang Y-M, Baum T, Kirschke JS (2019) Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA. Eur Radiol 29:4980–4989

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuit S, Van der Klift M, Weel A, De Laet C, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden A, Van Leeuwen J, Pols H (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ehresman J, Schilling A, Yang X, Pennington Z, Ahmed AK, Cottrill E, Lubelski D, Khan M, Moseley KF, Sciubba DM (2021) Vertebral bone quality score predicts fragility fractures independently of bone mineral density. The Spine Journal 21:20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Özmen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özmen, E., Biçer, O., Meriç, E. et al. Vertebral bone quality score for opportunistic osteoporosis screening: a correlation and optimal threshold analysis. Eur Spine J 32, 3906–3911 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07912-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07912-0

Keywords

Navigation