Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How does congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis bring about early trunk tilt and coronal imbalance during curve progression: a radiographic analysis to dissect the mechanism of proximal takeoff phenomenon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To dissect the mechanism of how congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis (CTS) drive the occurrence of early trunk tilt, namely proximal takeoff phenomenon (PTO) during curve progression.

Methods

CTS patients were stratified into case and control groups according to the presence of PTO. The radiographic deformity parameters of head–neck–shoulder complex were measured and compared between the two groups. The main risk factors for PTO were identified through multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

16 CTS patients with PTO were recruited, and the non-PTO group consisted of 19 CTS patients without PTO. The average Cobb angle was 64.9 ± 19.8° in PTO group and 57.7 ± 21.9° in control group (p > 0.05). Significant difference could be observed for head shift, neck tilt, trunk inclination, apex-C7 deformity angular ratio (DAR), apex translation ratio, C6 tilt, clavicle angle (CA), radiographic shoulder height (RSH), head–neck translation and coronal balance distance (CBD) (All p < 0.05) but not head tilt (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that head shift, but not neck tilt correlated significantly with the severity of trunk inclination (β = 0.106, p = 0.003), while apex-C7 DAR and apex translation ratio were the two factors contributing significantly to the severity of head shift (β = 0.620, p = 0.020; β = − 0.371, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Development and progression of head shift rather than neck tilt is a significant causative factor initiating the occurrence of trunk tilt and proximal takeoff in CTS. A higher apex-C7 DAR representing a short angular upper hemi curve and a lower apex translation ratio representing poor proximal coronal compensation are key risk factors predisposing to head shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li S, Chen ZH, Qiu Y et al (2018) Coronal decompensation after posterior-only thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection and short fusion in young children with congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:654–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E et al (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1043–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Tezer M et al (2008) Posterior vertebrectomy in kyphosis, scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis due to hemivertebra. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z et al (2018) Posterior-only hemivertebra resection for congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis: correcting neck tilt and balancing the shoulders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manaligod JM, Bauman NM, Menezes AH et al (1999) Cervical vertebral anomalies in patients with anomalies of the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:925–933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu M, Diao Y, Sun Y et al (2019) Evaluation of a combined approach to the correction of congenital cervical or cervicothoracic scoliosis. Spine J 19:803–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pu B, Li C, Li J et al (2019) Improvement of quality of life and mental health in patients with spasmodic torticollis after microvascular decompression. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 180:57–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M et al (2008) Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 17:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ et al (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2013–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu W, Sun X, Pan W et al (2019) Curve patterns deserve attention when determining the optimal distal fusion level in correction surgery for Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine J 19:1529–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buckland AJ, Moon JY, Betz RR et al (2019) Ponte osteotomies increase the risk of neuromonitoring alerts in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:E175–E180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan H, Li X, Huang Z et al (2017) Radiologic parameters can affect the preoperative decision making of three-column spinal osteotomies in the treatment of severe and stiff kyphoscoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E1371–E1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaskwhich D, Ali RM, Patel TC et al (2000) Congenital scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 12:61–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopez C, Bachofner C, Mercier M et al (2009) Gravity and observer’s body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures. J Vis 9:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarnutzer AA, Bockisch C, Straumann D et al (2009) Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability. J Neurophysiol 102:1657–1671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng JC, Tang SP, Chen TM et al (2000) The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants—a study of 1086 cases. J Pediatr Surg 35:1091–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Suhr MC, Oledzka M (2015) Considerations and intervention in congenital muscular torticollis. Curr Opin Pediatr 27:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burkhardt BW, Meyer C, Wagenpfeil G et al (2020) The effect of cervicodorsal hemivertebra resection on head tilt and trunk shift in children with congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 40:e256–e265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang S, Li J, Lü G et al (2018) Cervical hemivertebra resection and torticollis correction: report on two cases and literature review. Eur Spine J 27:501–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deburge A, Briard JL (1981) Cervical hemivertebra excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1335–1339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun X, Xu L, Chen Z et al (2019) Hybrid growing rod technique of osteotomy with short fusion and spinal distraction: an alternative solution for long-spanned congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:707–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center of Orthopedic Surgery (CXZX202214)

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yitong Zhu and Saihu Mao have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Yitong Zhu, Jie Zhou, Yong Qiu & Zezhang Zhu

  2. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing University, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Saihu Mao, Yanyu Ma, Song Li, Zhen Liu, Benlong Shi, Jun Qiao, Yong Qiu & Zezhang Zhu

Authors
  1. Yitong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saihu Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanyu Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jie Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Song Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Benlong Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jun Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zezhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zezhang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the University Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Mao, S., Ma, Y. et al. How does congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis bring about early trunk tilt and coronal imbalance during curve progression: a radiographic analysis to dissect the mechanism of proximal takeoff phenomenon. Eur Spine J 32, 3591–3598 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07884-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07884-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation