In this prospective, randomized study, we aimed to compare the global recovery scores and postoperative pain management between US-guided mTLIP block versus QLB after lumbar spine surgery.
60 patients with ASA score I-II planned for microendoscopic discectomy under general anesthesia were included. We allocated the patients into two groups: the QLB group (n = 30) or the mTLIP group (n = 30). QLB and mTLIP was performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the groups. Paracetamol 1 g IV 3 × 1 was ordered to the patients at the postoperative period. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, 1 mg/kg tramadol IV was administered as rescue analgesia.
There was a significant between-group difference in the mean global QoR-40 scores 24 h postsurgery. Both the static and dynamic NRS scores were significantly lower in the postoperative 1–16 h period in the mTLIP group. There was no significant between-group difference in the NRS scores 24 h postsurgery. There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative rescue analgesia consumption. However, the need for rescue analgesia was lower in the postoperative first 5 h in the mTLIP group, and survival probability was higher in the mTLIP group according to Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of adverse events.
mTLIP provided superior analgesia compared to posterior QLB. The QoR-40 scores in the mTLIP group were higher than those in the QLB group.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
The datasets of the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Kanno H, Aizawa T, Hahimoto K, Itoi E (2019) Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Int Orthop 43(4):917–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4256-5
Li X, Han Y, Di Z, Cui J, Pan J, Yang M, Sun G, Tan J, Li L (2016) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Neurosci 33:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01
Momin AA, Steinmetz MP (2020) Evolution of minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg 140:622–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.071
Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J (2015) Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth 62(11):1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y
Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Doymus O, Selvitopi K, Ahiskalioglu EO, Calikoglu C, Alici HA, Karaca O (2018) Efficacy of ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after spinal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 65(5):603–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1051-0
Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Alici HA (2017) Ultrasound-guided lateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: description of new modified technique. J Clin Anesth 40:62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.04.015
Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM (2017) Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth 64(7):775–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y
Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E (2015) Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 32(11):812–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299
Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M (2019) Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques. Anesthesiology 130(2):322–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524
El-Boghdadly K, Elsharkawy H, Short A, Chin KJ (2016) Quadratus lumborum block nomenclature and anatomical considerations. Reg Anesth Pain Med 41(4):548–549. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000411
Alver S, Bahadir C, Tahta AC, Cetinkal A, Gölboyu BE, Erdogan C, Ekinci M (2022) The efficacy of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block for pain management following lumbar spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 22(1):394. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01943-8.PMID:36536307
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA (2013) Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology 118(6):1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b
Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM (2000) Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth 84(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013383
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S (2000) Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 84(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366
Finnerty DT, McMahon A, McNamara JR, Hartigan SD, Griffin M, Buggy DJ (2020) Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 125(5):802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020
Yun S, Jo Y, Sim S, Jeong K, Oh C, Kim B, Lee WY, Park S, Kim YH, Ko Y, Chung W, Hong B (2021) Comparison of continuous and single interscalene block for quality of recovery score following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 29(1):23094990211000144. https://doi.org/10.1177/23094990211000142
Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y (2019) Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights. J Pain Res 27(12):2597–2613. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S182128
Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R (2012) The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat 221(6):507–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x
Çiftçi B, Ekinci M (2020) A prospective and randomized trial comparing modified and classical techniques of ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block. Agri 32(4):186–192. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2020.72325
Ciftci B, Ekinci M, Celik EC, Yayik AM, Aydin ME, Ahiskalioglu A (2020) Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for lumbar discectomy surgery: a Randomized. Controlled Study World Neurosurg 144:e849–e855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.077
Ekinci M, Çiftçi B, Çelik EC, Yayık AM, Tahta A, Atalay YO (2020) A comparison of the ultrasound-guided modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in lumbar spinal surgery patients. Agri 32(3):140–146. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2019.97759
Hamilton DL (2021) Does thoracolumbar interfascial plane block provide more focused analgesia than erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery?. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 33(1):92–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000643
The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This study has been approved by Istanbul Medipol University Ethics and Research Committee. (06.01.2022, Decision No. 37) The study was registered and recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05217121).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Alver, S., Ciftci, B., Celik, E.C. et al. Postoperative recovery scores and pain management: a comparison of modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and quadratus lumborum block for lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07812-3