Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Machine learning for the prediction of postoperative nosocomial pulmonary infection in patients with spinal cord injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish the best prediction model for postoperative nosocomial pulmonary infection through machine learning (ML) and assist physicians to make accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Methods

Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who admitted to a general hospital between July 2014 and April 2022 were included in this study. The data were segmented according to the ratio of seven to three, 70% were randomly selected to train the model, and the other 30% were used for testing. We used LASSO regression to screen the variables, and the selected variables were used in the construction of six different ML models. Shapley additive explanations and permutation importance were used to explain the output of the ML models. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used as the evaluation index of the model.

Results

A total of 870 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 98 (11.26%) developed pulmonary infection. Seven variables were used for ML model construction and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Among these variables, age, ASIA scale and tracheotomy were found to be the independent risk factors for postoperative nosocomial pulmonary infection in SCI patients. Meanwhile, the prediction model based on RF algorithm performed best in the training and test sets. (AUC = 0.721, accuracy = 0.664, sensitivity = 0.694, specificity = 0.656).

Conclusion

Age, ASIA scale and tracheotomy were the independent risk factors of postoperative nosocomial pulmonary infection in SCI. The prediction model based on RF algorithm had the best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang Y, Ding H, Zhou H, Wei Z, Liu L, Pan D, Feng S (2018) Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review. J Neurorestoratol 6:3

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burns SP (2007) Acute respiratory infections in persons with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 18:203–216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Michael J, Krause JS, Lammertse DP (1999) Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1411–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn M, Marino R, Ditunno J Jr (1990) Atelectasis and pneumonia in acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71:197–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McKinley W, Meade MA, Kirshblum S, Barnard B (2004) Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1818–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson JR, Arnold PM, Singh A, Kalsi-Ryan S, Fehlings MG (2012) Clinical prediction model for acute inpatient complications after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a subanalysis from the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg Spine 17:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Liu M, Li S, Bao Y, Jiang W, Tang S, Li F, Xue H (2022) A nomogram for predicting acute respiratory failure after cervical traumatic spinal cord injury based on admission clinical findings. Neurocrit Care 36:421–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I (2019) Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 380:1347–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian H, Ning Z, Zong Z, Liu J, Hu C, Ying H, Li H (2022) Application of machine learning algorithms to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. Front Med 8:2822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Li H, Carpenter C, Guan Y (2020) Challenge-enabled machine learning to drug-response prediction. AAPS J 22:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou Z-H (2021) Machine learning. Springer Nature, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Goecks J, Jalili V, Heiser LM, Gray JW (2020) How machine learning will transform biomedicine. Cell 181:92–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Hu J (2016) Risk prediction with electronic health records: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM. pp 432–440

  14. Liu W, Lee M, Wu S-N, Tong W-L, Li A-A, Sun B-L, Liu ZL, Liu J (2022) Using machine learning methods to predict bone metastases in breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma patients. Front Public Health, 2109

  15. Liu W-C, Li M-X, Qian W-X, Luo Z-W, Liao W-J, Liu Z-L, Liu J-M (2021) Application of machine learning techniques to predict bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Manag Res 13:8723–8736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu WC, Li ZQ, Luo ZW, Liao WJ, Liu ZL, Liu JM (2021) Machine learning for the prediction of bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed thyroid cancer. Cancer Med 10:2802–2811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauerbrei W, Royston P, Binder H (2007) Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building. Stat Med 26:5512–5528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kidd AC, McGettrick M, Tsim S, Halligan DL, Bylesjo M, Blyth KG (2018) Survival prediction in mesothelioma using a scalable Lasso regression model: instructions for use and initial performance using clinical predictors. BMJ Open Respir Res 5:e000240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao Z, Tang F, Chen C, Zhang C, Guo Y, Lin R, Huang Z, Teng Y, Xie T, Xu Y (2020) Impact of systematic factors on the outbreak outcomes of the novel COVID-19 disease in China: factor analysis study. J Med Internet Res 22:e23853

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hulsen T, Jamuar SS, Moody AR, Karnes JH, Varga O, Hedensted S, Spreafico R, Hafler DA, McKinney EF (2019) From big data to precision medicine. Front med 6:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goings JJ, Hammes-Schiffer S (2020) Nonequilibrium dynamics of proton-coupled electron transfer in proton wires: concerted but asynchronous mechanisms. ACS Cent Sci 6:1594–1601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu L-P, Zhao Q-Y, Wu J, Luo Y-W, Dong H, Chen Z-W, Gui R, Wang Y-J (2021) Machine learning for the prediction of red blood cell transfusion in patients during or after liver transplantation surgery. Front Med 8:632210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee S-I (2020) From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell 2:56–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Templeman L, Roberts F (2020) Effectiveness of expiratory muscle strength training on expiratory strength, pulmonary function and cough in the adult population: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 106:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevens EA, Marsh R, Wilson JA, Sweasey TA, Branch CL Jr, Powers AK (2010) A review of surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic central cord syndrome. Spine J 10:874–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiwari P, Colborn KL, Smith DE, Xing F, Ghosh D, Rosenberg MA (2020) Assessment of a machine learning model applied to harmonized electronic health record data for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1919396–e1919396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang J (2012) New machine learning algorithm: random forest. In: International conference on information computing and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 246–252

  29. Li W, Wang J, Liu W, Xu C, Li W, Zhang K, Su S, Li R, Hu Z, Liu Q (2021) Machine learning applications for the prediction of bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Front Public Health, 2034

  30. Kattan MW, Reuter V, Motzer RJ, Katz J, Russo P (2001) A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:63–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, Gong R, Wang K, Yan Z, Wan X, Liu G, Wu D, Shi L (2013) Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J clin oncol 31:1188–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong X, Yu Z, Cao W, Shi Y, Ma Q (2020) A survey on ensemble learning. Front Comp Sci 14:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta D, Rani R (2020) Improving malware detection using big data and ensemble learning. Comput Electr Eng 86:106729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nelson TG, Bowers WF (1957) Tracheotomy—indications, advantages, techniques, complications, and results: analysis of three hundred ten recent operations. J Am Med Assoc 164:1530–1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Apostolopoulou E, Bakakos P, Katostaras T, Gregorakos L (2003) Incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in 4 multidisciplinary intensive care units in Athens, Greece. Respir Care 48:681–688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibrahim EH, Tracy L, Hill C, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2001) The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a community hospital: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Chest 120:555–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province, China (No.20223BBG71S02), the central government guides local funds for scientific and technological development (No. 20222ZDH04095) and “Double Thousand Plan” Talent Project of Jiangxi Province, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shan-Hu Huang or Jia-Ming Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from any commercial party related to the subject of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and cases from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University signed a written informed consent form.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, MP., Liu, WC., Wu, JB. et al. Machine learning for the prediction of postoperative nosocomial pulmonary infection in patients with spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 32, 3825–3835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07772-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07772-8

Keywords

Navigation