Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for postoperative sympathetic chain dysfunction following oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a multivariate analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative sympathetic chain dysfunction (PSCD) was a relatively common complication after anterior lumbar interbody fusion due to the manipulation adjacent to the lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of PSCD and identify its related independent risk factors after oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.

Methods

PSCD was defined as either of the following in the affected lower limb compared to the contralateral: (1) increase in skin temperature by 1 ºC or more, (2) reduced skin perspiration, (3) limb swelling or skin discoloration. Consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at L4/5 level from February 2018 and May 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups: patients with PSCD and patients without PSCD. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed on patients’ demographic, comorbidities, radiological datum and perioperative factors to identify independent risk factors for PSCD.

Results

Twelve (5.7%) of 210 patients experienced PSCD following OLIF surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the identification of lumbar dextroscoliosis (OR = 7.907, P = 0.012) and the presence of “tear-drop” psoas (OR = 7.216, P = 0.011) as independent risk factors for the PSCD following OLIF.

Conclusion

This study identified the lumbar dextroscoliosis and the “tear-drop” psoas as independent risk factors for the development of PSCD after OLIF. Spine alignment examination and the morphological identification of psoas major muscle should be highly noticed for the PSCD prevention following OLIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available via the corresponding author's email when the manuscript is received.

References

  1. Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R et al (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6(2):89–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA (2017) Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1–L5 (OLIF25) and at L5–S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 17(4):545–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng ZY, Xu ZW, He DW et al (2018) Complications and prevention strategies of oblique lateral interbody fusion technique. Orthop Surg 10(2):98–106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulte TL, Mester B, Oberdiek D et al (2010) Approach-related lesions of the sympathetic chain in anterior correction and instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19(9):1558–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujibayashi S, Kawakami N, Asazuma T et al (2017) Complications associated with lateral interbody fusion: nationwide survey of 2998 cases during the first 2 years of its use in Japan. Spine 42(19):1478–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JS, Choi WS, Sung JH (2016) Minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion for L4–5: clinical outcomes and perioperative complications. Neurosurgery 63:190–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walker CT, Farber SH, Cole TS et al (2019) Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches. J Neurosurg Spine 30:446–460. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hexsel D, Rodrigues TC, Soirefmann M, Zechmeister-Prado D (2010) Recommendations for performing and evaluating the results of the minor test according to a sweating intensity visual scale. Dermatol Surg 36(1):120–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahatthanatrakul A, Itthipanichpong T, Ratanakornphan C et al (2019) Relation of lumbar sympathetic chain to the open corridor of retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine: an MRI study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 28(4):829–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao L, Xie T, Wang X et al (2022) Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Louie PK, Narain AS, Hijji FY et al (2017) Radiographic analysis of psoas morphology and its association with neurovascular structures at L4–5 with reference to lateral approaches. Spine 42(24):E1386–E1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng JP, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Tandon AA et al (2020) The oblique corridor at L4–L5: a radiographic-anatomical study into the feasibility for lateral interbody fusion. Spine 45(10):E552–E559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rutter G, Phan K, Smith A et al (2017) Morphometric anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic trunk with respect to the anterolateral approach to lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaver study. J Spine Surg (Hong Kong) 3(3):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasliwal MK, Deutsch H (2011) Anhidrosis after anterior retroperitoneal approach for L4–L5 artificial disc replacement. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 18(7):990–991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein NE (2019) Review of risks and complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). Surg Neurol Int 10:237. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_559_2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Iwanaga J, Zeoli T, Scullen T et al (2021) Cadaveric evidence of complete transection of the lumbar sympathetic trunk after extreme lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: a word of caution. Cureus 13(4):e14346

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Khalifé M, Dauzac C, Lenoir T et al (2021) Isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with circumferential arthrodesis (ALIF and posterior fixation): correction, fusion and indirect decompression. Acta Orthop Belg 87(4):787–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hrabalek L, Sternbersky J, Adamus M (2015) Risk of sympathectomy after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czechoslov 159(2):318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang JF, Fan SW, Fang XQ (2017) Clinical value of one⁃level oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases. Chin J Orthop 37(2):80–88

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kang BU, Choi WC, Lee SH et al (2009) An analysis of general surgery-related complications in a series of 412 mini-laparotomic anterior lumbosacral procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 10(1):60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Zhang Y, Ma X et al (2018) Radiographic study of lumbar sympathetic trunk in oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery. World Neurosurg 116:e380–e385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng D, Liao X, Wu R et al (2022) Surgical safe zones for oblique lumbar interbody fusion of L1–5: a cadaveric study. Clin Anat (New York, NY) 35(2):178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang F, Xu H, Yin B et al (2017) Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 26(3):646–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimizu T, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B et al (2021) Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 21(6):963–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka M, Okada H, Hashimoto Y et al (2021) Distinct associations of intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal visceral adipose tissues with metabolic syndrome and its components. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 40(5):3479–3484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank AJE (www.aje.com) for English language editing. The authors declare that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Funding

No fundings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dun Wan.

Ethics declarations

Cnflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Ethics Committee of Sichuan Orthopaedic Hospital (No.KY2020-043–01). Informed consent was waived because of its retrospective nature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Hou, W., Shi, H. et al. Risk factors for postoperative sympathetic chain dysfunction following oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a multivariate analysis. Eur Spine J 32, 2319–2325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07761-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07761-x

Keywords

Navigation