Abstract
Purpose
To report incidence of dural lacerations in lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and to describe patient outcomes following a novel full-endoscopic bimanual durotomy repair.
Methods
Retrospective review of prospectively collected database including 5.5 years of single surgeon experience with LE-ULBD. Patients with no durotomy were compared with patients who experienced intraoperative durotomy, including demographics, ASA score, prior surgery, number of levels treated, procedure time, hospital length of stay (LOS), visual analogue scale, perioperative complications, revision surgeries, use of analgesics, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Results
In total, 13/174 patients (7.5%) undergoing LE-ULBD experienced intraoperative durotomy. No significant differences in demographic, clinical or operative variables were identified between the 2 groups. Sustaining a durotomy increased LOS (p = 0.0019); no differences in perioperative complications or rate of revision surgery were identified. There was no difference in minimally clinically important difference for ODI between groups (65.6% for no durotomy versus 55.6% for durotomy, p = 0.54).
Conclusion
In this cohort, sustaining a durotomy increased LOS but, with accompanying intraoperative repair, did not significantly affect rate of complications, revision surgery or functional outcomes. Our method of bimanual endoscopic dural repair provides an effective approach for repair of dural lacerations in interlaminar ULBD cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ASA:
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- LE-ULBD:
-
Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression
- LOS:
-
Hospital length of stay
- MCID:
-
Minimal clinically important difference
- MIS:
-
Minimally invasive surgery
- ODI:
-
Oswestry disability index
- VAS:
-
Visual analogue scale
References
Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S et al (2015) Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pain Phys 18:61–70
Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2009) Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 10:476–485. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.7.17634
McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP (2019) Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 30:491–499. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
Telfeian AE, Shen J, Ali R, Oyelese A, Fridley J, Gokaslan ZL (2020) Incidence and implications of incidental durotomy in transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery: case series. World Neurosurg 134:e951–e955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.045
Kim HS, Raorane HD, Wu PH, Heo DW, Sharma SB, Jang I-T (2020) Incidental durotomy during endoscopic stenosis lumbar decompression: incidence, classification, and proposed management strategies. World Neurosurg 139:e13–e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.242
Ghobrial GM, Theofanis T, Darden BV, Arnold P, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS (2015) Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 39:E8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15266
Cammisa FP Jr, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2663–2667. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200010150-00019
Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD (1998) Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. Management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1728–1732. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199812000-00002
Tsutsumimoto T, Yui M, Uehara M, Ohta H, Kosaku H, Misawa H (2014) A prospective study of the incidence and outcomes of incidental dural tears in microendoscopic lumbar decompressive surgery. Bone Joint J 96-B:641–645. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32957
Soma K, Kato S, Oka H et al (2019) Influence of incidental dural tears and their primary microendoscopic repairs on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing microendoscopic lumbar surgery. Spine J 19:1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.015
Sen RD, White-Dzuro G, Ruzevick J et al (2018) Intra- and perioperative complications associated with endoscopic spine surgery: a multi-institutional study. World Neurosurg 120:e1054–e1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.009
Matsumoto M, Hasegawa T, Ito M et al (2010) Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 15:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1428-6
Ahn Y, Lee HY, Lee S-H, Lee JH (2011) Dural tears in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 20:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1493-8
Hofstetter CP, Ahn Y, Choi G et al (2020) AOSpine consensus paper on nomenclature for working-channel endoscopic spinal procedures. Glob Spine J 10:111S-121S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219887364
Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A et al (2010) Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1919–1924. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd
Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006
Hasan S, Härtl R, Hofstetter CP (2019) The benefit zone of full-endoscopic spine surgery. J Spine Surg 5:S41–S56. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2019.04.19
Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Alijanipour P et al (2016) The economic implications of an incidental durotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1548–1553. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001583
Oertel JM, Burkhardt BW (2017) Full endoscopic treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery. Eur Spine J 26:2496–2503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5105-8
Heo DH, Ha JS, Lee DC, Kim HS, Chung HJ (2022) Repair of incidental Durotomy using sutureless nonpenetrating clips via biportal endoscopic surgery. Global Spine J 12:452–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220956606
Park H-J, Kim S-K, Lee S-C, Kim W, Han S, Kang S-S (2020) Dural tears in percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery: anatomical location and management. World Neurosurg 136:e578–e585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.080
Shin JK, Youn MS, Seong YJ, Goh TS, Lee JS (2018) Iatrogenic dural tear in endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: full endoscopic dural suture repair (Youn’s technique). Eur Spine J 27:544–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5637-6
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Endoscopic Spine Research Group (ESRG, https://www.myhealthie.com/) for many informative discussions.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CPH contributed to Conceptualization and Design; JB contributed to Acquisition of Data; MEG, ONK, CPH contributed to Analysis and Interpretation of Data; MEG, ONK contributed to Drafting the Article; MEG, ONK, SD, CPH contributed to Critically Revising Article; all authors contributed to Review Submitted Version of Manuscript; ONK contributed to Statistical Analysis; ONK, CPH contributed to Study Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Hofstetter is a consultant for Joimax, Globus. Medical, Innovasis, and Johnson & Johnson.
Ethics approval
The University of Washington Human Subjects Division reviewed and approved this retrospective research study (IRB07742) with a waiver of informed consent, appropriately compliant with institutional requirements, and conducted in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 184492 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Greil, M.E., Bergquist, J., Kashlan, O.N. et al. Incidence and management of dural tears in full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomies for bilateral lumbar decompression. Eur Spine J 32, 2889–2895 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07749-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07749-7