Skip to main content
Log in

Revision surgery following long lumbopelvic constructs for adult spinal deformity: prospective experience from two dedicated databases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Pan Lumbar Arthodesis (PLA) are often required for Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) correction, reducing significantly the compensatory capacity in case of postoperative sagittal malalignment. Few papers have investigated outcomes and complications in this vulnerable subset of patients. The objective of this study was to assess revision surgery rate for PLA in ASD, its risk factors and impact on clinical outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective multicenter review of prospective ASD data from 7 hospitals covering Europe and Asia. ASD patients included in two prospective databases having a posterior instrumentation spanning the whole lumbar region with more than 2-years of follow-up were reviewed. Demographic, surgical, radiographic parameters and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression models analyzed risk factors for revision surgery as well as surgical outcomes. Patients with Early versus Late and PJK versus Non-PJK mechanical complications were also compared.

Results

Out of 1359 ASD patients included in the database 589 (43%) had a PLA and 357 reached 2-years mark. They were analyzed and compared to non-PLA patients. Average age was 67 and 82% were females. 100 Patients (28.1%) needed 114 revision surgeries (75.4% for mechanical failures). Revised patients were more likely to have a nerve system disorder, higher BMI and worst immediate postoperative alignment (as measured by GAP Parameters). These risk factors were also associated with earlier mechanical complications and PJK. Deformity and HRQoL parameters were comparable at baseline. Non-revised patients had significantly better clinical outcomes at 2-years (SRS 22 scores, ODI, Back pain). Multivariate analysis could identify nerve system disorder (OR 4.8; CI 1.8–12.6; p = 0.001), postoperative sagittal alignment (GAP Score) and high BMI (OR 1.07; CI 1.01–1.13; p = 0.004) as independent risk factors for revisions.

Conclusions

Revision surgery due to mechanical failures is relatively common after PLA leading to worse clinical outcomes. Prevention strategies should focus on individualized restoration of sagittal alignment and better weight control to decrease stress on these rigid constructs in non-compliant spines. Nerve system disorders independently increase revision risk in PLA.

Level of evidence II

Prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Pellise F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, Domingo-Sabat M, Bago J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Alanay A, Mannion AF, Acaroglu E, European Spine Study Group E (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheer JK, Hostin R, Robinson C, Schwab F, Lafage V, Burton DC, Hart RA, Kelly MP, Keefe M, Polly D, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Ames CP, International Spine Study G (2018) Operative management of adult spinal deformity results in significant increases in QALYs gained compared to nonoperative management: analysis of 479 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Passias PG, Jalai CM, Worley N, Vira S, Marascalchi B, McClelland S 3rd, Lafage V, Errico TJ (2017) Adult spinal deformity: national trends in the presentation, treatment, and perioperative outcomes from 2003 to 2010. Spine Deform 5:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uei H, Tokuhashi Y, Maseda M, Nakahashi M, Sawada H, Matsumoto K, Miyakata H (2018) Exploratory analysis of predictors of revision surgery for proximal junctional kyphosis or additional postoperative vertebral fracture following adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 13:252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0960-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul JC, Lonner BS, Goz V, Karia R, Toombs CS, Errico TJ (2016) An operative complexity index shows higher volume hospitals and surgeons perform more complex adult spine deformity operations. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 74:262–269

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pellise F, Serra-Burriel M, Smith JS, Haddad S, Kelly MP, Vila-Casademunt A, Sanchez Perez-Grueso FJ, Bess S, Gum JL, Burton DC, Acaroglu E, Kleinstuck F, Lafage V, Obeid I, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Alanay A, Ames C, International Spine Study G, European Spine Study G (2019) Development and validation of risk stratification models for adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.3.SPINE181452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study G (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Obeid I, Boissiere L, Yilgor C, Larrieu D, Pellise F, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Vital JM, Bourghli A, European Spine Study Group E (2016) Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning. Eur Spine J 25:3644–3649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4649-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boissiere L, Takemoto M, Bourghli A, Vital JM, Pellise F, Alanay A, Yilgor C, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Obeid I, European Spine Study G (2017) Global tilt and lumbar lordosis index: two parameters correlating with health-related quality of life scores-but how do they truly impact disability? Spine J 17:480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunez-Pereira S, Vila-Casademunt A, Domingo-Sabat M, Bago J, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A, Obeid I, Sanchez Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Pellise F, European Spine Study G (2018) Impact of early unanticipated revision surgery on health-related quality of life after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 18:926–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Larrieu D, Vital JM, Yilgor C, Pellise F, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJ, Kleinstuck F, Obeid I, European Spine Study G (2017) Lack of improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores 6 months after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) predicts high revision rate in the second postoperative year. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 26:2160–2166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5068-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chanbour H, Roth SG, LaBarge ME, Steinle AM, Hills J, Abtahi AM, Stephens BF, Zuckerman SL (2023) The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine Deform 11(1):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00576-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haddad S, Nunez-Pereira S, Pigrau C, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Vila-Casademunt A, Alanay A, Acaroglu ER, Kleinstueck FS, Obeid I, Perez-Grueso FJS, Pellise F, European Spine Study G (2018) The impact of deep surgical site infection on surgical outcomes after posterior adult spinal deformity surgery: a matched control study. Eur Spine J 27:2518–2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5583-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin-Buitrago MP, Pizones J, Sanchez Perez-Grueso FJ, Diaz Almiron M, Vila-Casademunt A, Obeid I, Alanay A, Kleinstuck F, Acaroglu ER, Pellise F, Group EESS (2018) Impact of iliac instrumentation on the quality of life of patients with adult spine deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:913–918. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniels AH, Koller H, Hiratzka SL, Mayer M, Meier O, Contag AG, Eltorai AEM, Hiratzka J, Kojo Hamilton D, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Bess S, Klineberg EO, Ames CP, Lafage V, Line B, Schwab FJ, Hart RA, Group ISS (2017) Selecting caudal fusion levels: 2 year functional and stiffness outcomes with matched pairs analysis in multilevel fusion to L5 versus S1. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 26:1645–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4790-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart RA, Hiratzka J, Kane MS, Lafage V, Klineberg E, Ames CP, Line BG, Schwab F, Scheer JK, Bess S, Hamilton DK, Shaffrey CI, Mundis G, Smith JS, Burton DC, Sciubba DM, Deviren V, Boachie-Adjei O, International Spine Study G (2017) Stiffness after pan-lumbar arthrodesis for adult spinal deformity does not significantly impact patient functional status or satisfaction irrespective of proximal endpoint. Spine 42:1151–1157. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soroceanu A, Burton DC, Diebo BG, Smith JS, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Boachie-Adjei O, Mundis GM Jr, Ames C, Errico TJ, Bess S, Gupta MC, Hart RA, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2015) Impact of obesity on complications, infection, and patient-reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 23:656–664. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Djurasovic M, Bratcher KR, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY (2008) The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion. Spine 33:1789–1792. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f6f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S, Maltenfort MG, Deutsch H, Vaccaro AR, Harrop J, Sharan A, Ratliff JK (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6:291–297. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Yi JS, Pahys JM, Zebala LP, Kang MM, Cho W, Baldus CR (2012) Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:489–500. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182217ab5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soroceanu A, Diebo BG, Burton D, Smith JS, Deviren V, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Mundis G, Ames C, Errico T, Bess S, Hostin R, Hart R, Schwab F, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2015) Radiographical and implant-related complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, patient risk factors, and impact on health-related quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khkshnu C (2019) Modified global alignment and proportion scoring with body mass index and bone mineral density (GAPBB) for prediction of mechanical complication after adult spinal deformity surgery: retrospective analysis of 203 patients. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the scoliosis research society. Montreal, Canada

  24. Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, Togawa D, Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Banno T, Oe S, Arima H, Mihara Y, Ushirozako H, Kobayashi S, Matsuyama Y (2020) Extensive spinal fusion surgery in patients with Parkinson disease or atypical Parkinsonism: time course of clinical outcomes in 5 years progress report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:E217–E226. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ames CP, Smith JS, Pellise F, Kelly M, Gum JL, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Perez-Grueso FJS, Kleinstuck FS, Obeid I, Vila-Casademunt A, Shaffrey CI Jr, Burton DC, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI Sr, Bess S, Serra-Burriel M, European Spine Study G, International Spine Study G (2019) Development of predictive models for all individual questions of SRS-22R after adult spinal deformity surgery: a step toward individualized medicine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06079-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Emre Acaroğlu; M.D PhD. For his invaluable labor in the foundation of the ESSG, his contribution to the success of group, his commitment in recruitment and follow-up of patients and his continuous scientific and logistic support.

Funding

The European Spine Study Group receives funding support from DePuy Synthes and Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sleiman Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained through each of the member sites contributing cases. Patients signed individual conscent form to be included in this database.

Conflict of interest

Grants, technical support, and corporate support: The European Spine Study Group receives funding support from DePuy Synthes and Medtronic. No other conflicts of interests exist with the presented data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad, S., Yasuda, T., Vila-Casademunt, A. et al. Revision surgery following long lumbopelvic constructs for adult spinal deformity: prospective experience from two dedicated databases. Eur Spine J 32, 1787–1799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07627-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07627-2

Keywords

Navigation