Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robust prediction of nonhome discharge following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using explainable machine learning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Predict nonhome discharge (NHD) following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using an explainable machine learning model.

Methods

2227 patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2008 to 2019 were identified from a single institutional database. A machine learning model was trained on preoperative variables, including demographics, comorbidity indices, and levels fused. The validation technique was repeated stratified K-Fold cross validation with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) statistic as the performance metric. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were calculated to provide further explainability regarding the model’s decision making.

Results

The preoperative model performed with an AUROC of 0.83 ± 0.05. SHAP scores revealed the most pertinent risk factors to be age, medicare insurance, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. Interaction analysis demonstrated that female patients over 65 with greater fusion levels were more likely to undergo NHD. Likewise, ASA demonstrated positive interaction effects with female sex, levels fused and BMI.

Conclusion

We validated an explainable machine learning model for the prediction of NHD using common preoperative variables. Adding transparency is a key step towards clinical application because it demonstrates that our model’s “thinking” aligns with clinical reasoning. Interactive analysis demonstrated that those of age over 65, female sex, higher ASA score, and greater fusion levels were more predisposed to NHD. Age and ASA score were similar in their predictive ability. Machine learning may be used to predict NHD, and can assist surgeons with patient counseling or early discharge planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epstein NE (2019) A review of complication rates for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI-191-2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 32:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newhouse JP, Garber AM (2013) Geographic variation in medicare services. N Engl J Med 368:1465–1468. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1302981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neifert SN, Gal JS, Chapman EK, Caridi JM (2020) Nonhome discharge as an independent risk factor for adverse events and readmission in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Spine Surg 33:E454–E459. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schoenfeld AJ, Harris MB, Liu H, Birkmeyer JD (2014) Variations in medicare payments for episodes of spine surgery. Spine J 14:2793–2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.07.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dial BL, Esposito VR, Danilkowicz R et al (2020) Factors associated with extended length of stay and 90-day readmission rates following ACDF. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219843111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Lombardi JM et al (2020) Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 20:1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Virk SS, Phillips FM, Khan SN (2016) Reimbursement related to a 90-day episode of care for a one or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goyal A, Ngufor C, Kerezoudis P et al (2019) Can machine learning algorithms accurately predict discharge to nonhome facility and early unplanned readmissions following spinal fusion? Analysis of a national surgical registry. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.3.SPINE181367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martini ML, Neifert SN, Oermann EK et al (2021) Application of cooperative game theory principles to interpret machine learning models of nonhome discharge following spine surgery. Spine 46:803–812. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon AIF, Sung JJY (2021) Opening the black box of AI-medicine. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 36:581–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alsoof D, McDonald CL, Kuris EO, Daniels AH (2022) Machine learning for the orthopaedic surgeon: uses and limitations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundberg S, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv [cs.AI]

  14. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS et al (2018) Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 2:749–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ley C, Martin RK, Pareek A et al (2022) Machine learning and conventional statistics: making sense of the differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:753–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06896-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chandra A, Dalton MA, Holmes J (2013) Large increases in spending on postacute care in medicare point to the potential for cost savings in these settings. Health Aff 32:864–872. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Data. https://data.cms.gov/provider-summary-by-type-of-service/medicare-post-acute-care-hospice/medicare-post-acute-care-hospice-by-provider-and-service/data/2019. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  19. Salas-Vega S, Chakravarthy VB, Winkelman RD et al (2021) Late-week surgery and discharge to specialty care associated with higher costs and longer lengths of stay after elective lumbar laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosman M, Rachminov O, Segal O, Segal G (2015) Prolonged patients’ in-hospital waiting period after discharge eligibility is associated with increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 15:246. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0929-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Price WN (2018) Big data and black-box medical algorithms. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aao5333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Capua J, Somani S, Kim JS et al (2017) Predictors for patient discharge destination after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 42:1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martini ML, Neifert SN, Gal JS et al (2021) Drivers of prolonged hospitalization following spine surgery: a game-theory-based approach to explaining machine learning models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:64–73. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ondeck NT, Bohl DD, Bovonratwet P et al (2018) Discriminative ability of commonly used indices to predict adverse outcomes after poster lumbar fusion: a comparison of demographics, ASA, the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the modified Frailty Index. Spine J 18:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buerba RA, Giles E, Webb ML et al (2014) Increased risk of complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the elderly: an analysis of 6253 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Spine 39:2062–2069. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun S. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained for the submitted work at our institution, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geng, E.A., Gal, J.S., Kim, J.S. et al. Robust prediction of nonhome discharge following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using explainable machine learning. Eur Spine J 32, 2149–2156 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07621-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07621-8

Keywords

Navigation